Preview

Solomon E. Asch's "Opinions and Social Pressure" Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Solomon E. Asch's "Opinions and Social Pressure" Essay Example
Solomon E. Asch's "Opinions and Social Pressure"
(Scientific American, Vol 193, No. 5, 1955)

In the 1950s the social psychologist Solomon Asch conducted a famous experiment that highlighted the weakness of the person in a mass society when he is confronted with the differing opinion of a majority, and the tendency to conform even if this means to go against the person's basic perceptions. He demonstrated that naïve subjects could be induced to answer incorrectly by implicit social pressure. These are also known as the “Asch Paradigm”.
The basic design of Asch’s study consisted of groups of seven to nine male college students seated in a classroom for a ‘psychological experiment in visual judgment’. The experimenter told them that they would be comparing the length of lines and he showed them two white cards below. The card on the left was the standard line to be judged and the card on the right shows the three comparison lines.
The participants were asked to give their judgment aloud and they did so in the order in which they were seated. There was only one participant in each group and the rest were confederates of the experimenters. The real participant sat one from the end of a row, so all but one of the confederates gave answers before them. On certain pre-arranged trails the confederates were told to give the same incorrect answers. The researchers were interested to find out the response of the one participant to this majority opinion.
Each series of line judgments had 18 trials, and on 12 of these, the majority gave unanimous incorrect answers. On these 12 unanimous incorrect trials around 75% of the 123 participants went along with the majority at least once. Under the pressure of the group, the participants accepted the judgment of the majority on 36.8% of the trials.
There were, however, considerable individual differences, with about 25% of the participants never agreeing with the majority, while some other participants agreed with the majority

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One strength of this theory is that it has research to support it from Asch's 1951 study into conformity. The interviews that were taken after the experiment had finished, stated that there were two main reasons that the participants conformed. The first reason was that they didn't want to be ridiculed by the rest of the group from differing in opinions. They wanted to fit in so went along with the majority group, typical of normative social influence. The second reason was that they honestly thought that the rest of the group knew better than them and that their own judgements were incorrect, typical of informational social influence.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study 4 In a simulation training study, undergraduate participants will be asked to help another participant learn a list of words. In reality, though, the participant learning the words will be an experimenter confederate who purposely gets some of the words wrong. The actual participants will be told that they have to scold the learner whenever the learner makes a mistake. Anytime the participants hesitate in scolding the learner for mistakes, the experimenter will tell them that they must scold the learner or they will not receive credit for the experiment. The number of times the participants scold the learners will be recorded. Each participant will sign a consent form before the experiment begins.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two major studies in which we can look, at these are Asch and Zimbardo. Asked our student volunteers to take part in the vision test, all but one of the volunteers were colleagues of the experimenter. the volunteers were shown 3 lines the free lines were all different sizes and there was a fourth line which was the same size as one of the 3 lines. All the volunteers had to do was to say Which line was the same size as the separate fourth line. Altogether there were 123 American undergraduates being tested. Asch showed a series of lines to participants seated around a table, participants always answered in the same order. The colleagues were instructed to give the same incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials. On 12 critical trials 36.8% of the participants got the answer incorrect in other words they conformed with the majority. A quarter of the participants did not conform on any of the trials. Although people did conform the size of the group depended on how many people conform e.g. if there was a large group and they all said the wrong answers the participant will become suspicious and not conform. Also the participants profession could make a difference on whether they conform e.g. a maths teacher will realise that the size of the line is the same as they work with this sort of thing every day. When the difference between the sizes of the lines decreased, making it harder to distinguish the difference between the lines, the level of conformity increased. this study was only conducted on American men during a period of time when people were scared to be different. another weakness is that only one third of participants conformed the other participants stuck and gave the right answer or the answer they thought was right The next study is Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment. To conduct this experiment a mock correctional facility was constructed in the basement of Stanford University, an advert was…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Solomon Asch was a social psychologist way back in the 1950s, which is even before my parents were born. Asch conducted a famous experiment on the effects of peer pressure on a person. What he found was that a person had a “tendency to conform, even it means to go against the person’s basic perceptions”. The web page also said that people “are swayed by the masses against our deepest feelings and convictions”. 1 These experiments that Asch created developed the theory of conformism, which says that a person will go along with the group, especially in a crisis.…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Behavior Quiz Paper

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In experiments, the power of groups to influence an individual to agree with the incorrect judgment of the others is known as the _____.…

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conformity in to society by everyone’s choices is engraved in the mind to fit in and to not disturb the status quo, such as clothing styles, behaviors, and personality traits are categorized into “cliques”. Within “Opinions and Social Pressure”, it is seen that against the better judgment of the subject, he/she still went along the popular consensus choosing the incorrect answer (Asch 144). Knowing this, it allows for us to conclude that peer pressure is shown to be more convincing than we can resist despite our best…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Review the section on Asch's Research from your textbook. Describe why the individuals in the Asch experiment usually gave the same answer when they probably knew that it was wrong. How do social control and social bonding explain conformity?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Psych Journal

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    involved perceptual abilities. In the first condition, participants estimated the length of lines after hearing five people pretending to be participants (confederates) give inaccurate estimates. In the second condition,…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch Conformity Essay

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Asch Conformity is an experiment where the researchers watch the participants answer questions and see what their answer is. Researchers are looking to see if the participants are persuaded one way or another when answering a question in a group setting. This study is similar to being in a class with other students. The teacher could go person to person asking a question and after the first person answers, the rest of them will typically say, “I got with he/she got.” More than half the time, they don’t know the answer or they don’t want to stick out like a sore thumb if their answer is wrong. This study is very similar to the actual Asch procedure. This experiment included 24 college students, 13 females and 11 males, during 18 trials of deciding which cards had the same length of the line printed on them.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Opening Statement

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    - research shows that many jurors form strong opinions after opening statements and interpret all of the subsequent evidence in light of those initial impressions…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror's Arguement Analysis

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To measure this, surveys were given to jurors who served on a jury that had come to a conclusion, whether it was to convict, acquit, or resulted in a hung jury. One particular question in the survey required participants to respond whether or not their individual verdict mirrored the final verdict of the group. Waters and Hans (2009) measured these one-person verdicts based on combining all counts, the first more severe count, and lesser included counts. They found, depending on the approach and severity of counts used to measure the dissent, that approximately 38 percent to 54 percent of the jurors who participated in the survey had disagreeing individual verdicts in comparison to the final verdict given by the group (Waters et al., 2009, p. 523). According to Waters and Hans (2009), approximately 6 percent of jury trials result in a hung jury; with the staggering percent of jurors holding dissenting individual verdicts provided in the results of their study, it can be concluded that the percentage of hung juries should be significantly…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch’s conformity study made participants tell differences in length of lines when the majority answered incorrectly. These people did not receive any explanation why the majority disagreed and it dealt with an issue that was unimportant. Confusion would have been an issue and it is “hard to act independently when things don’t make sense”. People actively construe and act in response to their subjective interpretation of the experience. It is imperative to imagine oneself in the experiment to understand why someone would not have spoken up.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The researchers split the experiment into two trials. Each trial has thirty six identical trivia claims with divergent conditions. In the first trial, the condition is that half of the questions will be present with the nonprobative photographs, which means they are related to the trivia claims but do not suggest the answers. In the second trial, the condition changes to all of the questions will be present with only trivia claims. In both conditions, the participants have to answer that whether the trivia claim is true or false. By designing these two conditions, the researchers will be able to compare the participants’ bias to say “true” with the trivia claims that have nonprobative photographs versus with only the trivia claims in the first trial and in the second trial. After comparing, the researchers will be able to indicate that whether or not the participants still maintain their answers of trivia claims with nonprobative photographs in the second…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One hundred and twenty three male college students were involved in the study. Participants were shown a series of lines, a ‘standard’ line and several other lines in which they would match to the standard line. Their answers were announced one by one in seated order. All participants were told to answer unanimously before the trials began, except for one person out of the group. That one person was the focus of the study, seated at the end of the seating arrangement. His answers gave insights to the effective role social pressure plays on people’s decisions (178). During the trials, 36.8 percent of the participants sided with the unanimous incorrect answers given by the group. Another trial of the study showed, when given at least two people who answered incorrectly, it drastically swayed the opinion of the chosen individual, causing the individual to answer incorrectly by 13.6 percent. Given at least three people who answered incorrectly, the percentage jumped to 31.8 percent, however, anymore than three people would cause the effects of social pressure to remain fairly consistent (180). Solomon Asch also conducted an experiment where no subjects were told of the researchers…

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays