1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining?
There are many advantages and disadvantages when it comes to plea bargaining. Among the advantages the defendants could possibly receive a lighter sentence, they can end up with a lesser charge, and most importantly they move through the criminal justice system a lot faster than if they were to fight a case. As for disadvantages both the defendants and the victims would be affected by plea bargaining. The defendant might not be guilty however he/she knows not enough evidence exists to prove their innocence and so they accept the plea, thus accepting punishment this not deserved. Victims are affected by plea bargaining because they almost always feel cheated as though the accused did not get what he/she deserved and as though justice was not served.
2. Why is the attorney–client privilege protected?
It is protected in order to ensure that the client can feel secure and not feel as though whatever he/she discloses will be put out to any third party. The underlying principle of the privilege is to provide for sound legal advice and advocacy, subsequently the client may be more willing to communicate to the counsel things that might otherwise be suppressed. As a result the attorney should be able to offer more accurate and well-reasoned professional advice.
3. Should the courts be able to reverse an acquittal of a defendant if it was obtained through the unethical practices of his or her attorney? Explain why.
Yes the courts should be able to reverse an acquittal of a defendant if it was obtained through his/her attorney’s unethical practices. I believe everyone should be held responsible for their own individual actions. I believe also you’re paying your lawyer to do the right thing and therefore his unethical behavior should not reflect or thus cause you harm.
\
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A child learns that whenever he eats all of his dinner he gets a cookie for dessert. This type of learning is BEST explained by _______________.…
- 798 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
As the prosecuting attorney, or the district attorney I am responsible for representing the states case against Tim Masters. It is my job to work with the investigating detectives and the police department to build a sold case against Tim Masters. The burden of proof rest souls on my shoulders, I must prove without a reasonable doubt that Tim Masters killed Peggy Hettrick. My job is the hardest job of all the court actors. I have several rules of conduct I must follow to ensure that my case in lawful and does not violate any person rights. In the case of Tim Masters, I used evidence found in his home to win the case against him. As the prosecuting attorney, I first had to look at the evidence presented by me from the police department and determine if this was enough…
- 440 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
First, when it comes to plea bargaining there are two types that the attorneys deal with the most , they are charge bargaining and sentence bargaining: charge bargaining is the most common form of plea bargaining, the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge provided that greater charges will be dismissed. A typical example would be to plead to manslaughter rather than murder (Find Law, 2014) Sentence bargaining is a far less common and more tightly controlled that charge bargaining, sentence bargaining is when a defendant agrees to plead guilty to the stated charger in return for a lighter sentence. Typically this must be reviewed by a judge, and man jurisdictions simply don’t allow it (Find Law, 2014). Basically the different between the two are charge bargain occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to plead and serve a lesser charge (Larson, 2000). Sentence bargain basically occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his or her sentence will be if they plead guilty.…
- 1189 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1 What is the purpose of a CIRT plan? Describe what this plan does and what other plan it ties into.…
- 531 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…
- 1298 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Charge bargaining and sentence bargaining are two types of plea-bargaining that attorneys will use when offering a defendant the plea-bargaining option. Charge bargaining refers to the prosecutor’s ability to negotiate with the defendant in terms of the charges that could be filed; sentence bargaining occurs when a defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a less serious sentence(Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Plea-bargaining is good for the fact that it brings the court convictions of criminals. There are advantages of plea-bargaining for the prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, defendant, and victim. First the prosecutor obtains a conviction which is always a good day in their book. The defense attorney also has the advantage when this option is agreed on for the fact that he or she gets their client a lighter…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…
- 177 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Plea-bargains are used in many situations depending on the district. However, courts do use plea-bargains when the courts are overcrowded or if there is a high profile case that needs more time and attention. A pled deal affords the defendant to save time, money and often times minimizing the sentence term (Thomson, 2013).…
- 1461 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining is that some bad and some type of good will always come out of it. Advantages help the court manage the case and disadvantages can be a problem for the court and also to the defendant that 's asking for a plea bargaining. These advantages can put a bad taste in the prosecutors mouth about the defendant if their plea isn’t sincere, the system have to feel where you are coming from and also agree with it. Show some type of affection when standing before a juror.…
- 1009 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
7. When the researcher measures a behavior that needs to be changed, applies therapy and measures the behavior again, and then removes the treatment and measures the behavior again, this is referred to as ABA design.…
- 604 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are obvious advantages in terms of time and cost for the judicial system. For judges and prosecutors, plea bargaining provides relief to hectic schedules and an overcrowded docket. Any case resolved outside of the court setting can also ease the burden on limited funds and personnel. Another benefit for prosecutors is the assurance of a conviction, whereas a trial offers the possibility of acquittal. For the defendant, a plea bargain usually involves a lesser charge on their record and a…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In my opinion, plea bargaining can be a very proactive part of the criminal justice system. In order to achieve this, prosecutors need to be fair when applying charges to the defendants. The defendant by pleading guilty to a lesser charge is not being deprived of his rights; instead he is opting out of his rights by accepting the lesser charge.…
- 2152 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When it comes to the prosecutor they are the one who would off the plea bargains. The plea bargain helps them go through a case faster due to the caseload they are giving, but it also helps them be able to use less resources so they can use the resources on the bigger case that will need them. It also helps with the workroom group so there is less conflict (Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. 2011).…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
-The benefits to plea-bargaining for society do not outweigh the cost to the individual because 95 percent of guilty convictions are a result of plea-bargaining. While the individual is generally hurt because of plea-bargaining, society benefits and suffers from it as well. Society benefits from plea-bargaining as it keeps the criminal justice system moving forward and allows judges to see more cases in a shorter period of time. This is good for society, as individuals are not held for a long period of time waiting for their trials to come up. At the same time it does not help society because more individuals are going to jail even when they did not commit the crime because they are better off just taking the plea deal instead of fighting the case in court. Individuals end up suffering from prosecutors overcharging individuals just to gain a conviction. Society also ends up having to pay for the rising costs of prisons as more people are convicted and have to serve time. Societies also suffer from plea-bargaining because individuals are going to prison and are unable to take care of their family while being locked up.…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One of the ethical difficulties that the ABA code creates for the conscientious lawyer occurs when the lawyer gets a guilty client off on a crime that they know they committed. Another ethical difficulty occurs because the code states that they must defend their client even if they know they are guilty, they must do everything they can to win an acquittal but they also have an ethical obligation to prevent another crime from happening. The dilemma occurs when they know their client will commit the same crime again. The conscientious lawyer is also instructed by Canon 7 not to make his own decision about what is just. He cannot take on the role of judge or jury. He must leave it in the hands of the Judge or jury to decide his client’s guilt or innocents. If a lawyer finds it difficult to handle such a situation they can take solace in the belief of Samuel Johnson whose belief it was that the truth is decided by the court’s verdict not the conscious of the lawyer. Dr. Johnson states that even if you, the lawyer on a case feels that his/her arguments are weak they don’t know if they might convince the judge anyway and if it does then the lawyer was wrong and the judge was right.…
- 393 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays