Plea Bargaining Analysis

Determine Appropriate Uses for Plea-bargaining A plea bargain (“offer”) is an acquiescent in a criminal case whereby the prosecution may offer the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, conventionally to a lesser charge or to the pristine criminal charge with a proposal of a lighter than the maximum sentence. This opportunity sanctions defendants to avoid the risk of a conviction by trial on a more serious charge. This allows a court’s caseloads to be lighter without exhausting resources of a court, potential public advocators, and prosecutors who are all salaried at the expense of tax payers.
Plea-bargains are used in many situations depending on the district. However, courts do use plea-bargains when the courts are overcrowded or if there is a high profile case that needs more time and attention. A pled deal affords the defendant to save time, money and often times minimizing the sentence term (Thomson, 2013).
Plea-Bargaining Violate Due Process
An example of the reduced interest could be when someone has lost a life and the prosecution gives a deal to reduce murder to manslaughter thereby, affording the defendant to serve less time in prison. Unfortunately, the research article “Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining?” by Luka, Kutateladze & Johnson, black defendants rarely receive lesser deal offers, and both black and Latino defendants were more likely to receive prison sentence offers. However, these differences were largely explained by legal factors, evidence, arrest conditions, and court actor characteristics, though black defendants are still more likely to receive prison sentence bargains after including these things. No differences were found between white and Asian defendants (Luka, 2014).
Should the Supreme Court set rules for