Preview

Pro-Gun Speech Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pro-Gun Speech Example
Imagine you are in your house, it’s nighttime, and you are about to turn in for the night. Suddenly, you hear a sound from the front door, but you’re not expecting anybody. You become suspicious and worry, for what awaits behind the door? You fear for your family, your little three-year-old baby girl. As an instinct, as a parent, what is the first thing you grab? Not your son’s baseball bat or your golf club, what if the intruder is a burly, six foot tall man? Anything aside from your dependable gun, you feel, would be ineffective to the safekeeping of your precious family and security of your loving home. You grab your gun and stand in front of your family. Your spouse begins to cry and holds your children tightly within their arms. Suddenly you hear a pound, a crisp crackle, and a shout from behind you. You hear the intruder stalk down the hall to the room where you and your family wait, and soon he stands facing you in the doorway. The door creaks open, you hear a click from his gun, and he opens the door. He looks at you, and he realizes you have a gun pointed at his chest. He begins to run away. Now, at this point, would you not be glad that you had this reliable gun? Guns aren’t the catalyst of crime ladies and gentlemen. Criminals are. The problem is NOT the gun control, but the criminal control. Don’t you agree that any disturbed person is far more dangerous than a loaded gun? A gun is predictable, while a disturbed person is not.
To begin with, guns aren’t the ONLY source of crime in America. There are many fatal car accidents as well, and they kill around 40,000 people annually, so should we ban cars too? Should anything and everything that causes deaths be banned as well? The government and the anti-gun lobby need to understand that guns should not be blamed for everything and people should be trusted with guns. No matter which tool is used in the homicide, the bottom line remains the same. Weapons do not kill people; people kill people.
Moreover,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article, “Gun Control Isn’t Crime Control”, the author John Stossel argues exactly the opposite. Stossel claims that the United States gun control system does not effectively diminish crime rates within the nation; instead, Stossel provides evidence proving the very opposite effect. Summed up, the article mentions how an armed society tends to be safer, with lower violence and crime rates. This is mainly due to criminals becoming fearful of committing crimes, as they know that a civilian is likely to be armed, creating both an obstacle and a threat.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every Time there is a violent crime involving guns the media and public leaders blame guns and not the person accused of committing the crime FBI conducted an experiment and people were likely to be killed by a handheld object five times more than a rifle. Banning guns will affect only the law abiding citizens not criminals. Criminals don't follow the law that's why they are called criminals. If you're going to outlaw guns then might as well ban everything on market that can potentially hurt people. Gun laws in the U.S. should not be restricted because…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The war on guns has been fought for decades. Yet today guns are more plentiful, unabated more potent, and cheaper than ever. New guns are developed all the time. The authorities can’t keep criminals with gun related violence out of prisons — which fact alone should end all argument.…

    • 3378 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although guns provide a good way to protect us, they also offer an effective method to kill others. Perhaps many people may argue that gun is just one of the numerous tools killers use, they believe that gun control can’t eliminate murder. However, “The biggest problem with firearms is they kill quickly and they kill efficiently. The problem there is the instant impulse leads to death” (Schoener). Even though the government set up several restrictions for owning guns, killers can easily get them. What is worse, with the gun culture, people are more likely to release their anger by shooting. These entire make the gun law the most dangerous law we’ve ever…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a family peacefully enjoying their time together one evening safe in their house until a robber breaks into the house and threatens to do terrible things to the family but, someone in the household is wielding a firearm and deters the robber. Now imagine the same scenario as before but how different the outcome might have been if firearm were not present and the family was subject to the cruelty of the robber and how dreadful that might be. The ownership of firearms in the United States has long been a part of the history for this country and after over a 200 year presence of guns in America, some are calling for a transformation of what our founding fathers set forth and signed in the year 1787. This can be attributed to the recent…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is easily linked to the availability of guns. The debate on whether guns are a tradition and a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution or whether they are a dangerous contribution to the problems at hand make for an explosive argument. With a major outbreak of violence in our country, some people think that if we repeal the Second Amendment it would solve the problem. These people have two reasons; One, is the rising of violence amongst teenagers, the second, is their interpretation of the Second Amendment. The side opposing these views use arguments like how it would be impossible to repeal the Second Amendment, and we have a long history…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Troy Bowdish P.6 4/11/18 Argumentative Essay Gun Control Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that really came into play in 2018. Some people say gun control is going to be the only way to stop mass shootings in the U.S., while others disagree and think gun control is considered unconstitutional because it would be voiding our 2nd Amendment right, “The right to bear arms.” Americans should have stricter gun control laws because gun control should become institutionalized which would lower crime rate, limit the ways felons can get ahold of guns, and decrease the amount of mass shootings across the US drastically; however, some people might disagree because they think it’s unconstitutional or that it would violate our…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people hold the opinion that extraditing the use of firearms for citizens will reduce the amount of criminals in their community, and even the whole country. However, this is not the way it actually turns out to be. If citizens want their community to have reduced crime levels, they should not be fighting the rights to bear arms. Some of the deadly crimes that occur could be preventable if someone were carrying a weapon to assist in preventing it. For instance, that one person is carrying a firearm does not guarantee that any crime will be halted because of the presence of a weapon, it just means that the firearm can be an asset to stop a crime being committed. For a reference to show the brutality that occurs in the United States, “The murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate [in the United States] is 63.3 percent” (Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2001). In the years between Washington DC’s Gun Ban Law and Trigger-Lock Law, which was a law stating that all firearms when unattended must be put on safety, or disassembled, were in effect, the crime rate increased by 76 percent (Pub Med. 1994). This percentage shown about the increased crime rate even while a gun ban law was in effect is a very satisfying number to those who oppose the strict aspects of gun control. 76 percent indicates a clear example of how crime in the United States does not subside when there are laws in effect to prevent citizens from owning their guns; in fact, the 76 percent increase shows that with this law, the crime rate has worsened. Crime does not stop just because law abiding citizens get their firearms taken away by the government; A survey conducted in 1997 showed that more than 18,000 prison inmates found that among those serving time for a violent crime, "30% of State offenders and 35% of Federal offenders carried a firearm when committing the crime.”…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debate

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Proponents of gun control believe that stronger laws can prevent the needless loss of life. Even individuals who support gun rights acknowledge that certain people should not be permitted to own guns. Current gun control laws prevent criminals, mentally ill individuals and children from owning guns. Unfortunately, there have been instances where young people and deranged gunmen have acquired weapons and used them to commit mass murders. Law reviews from the 1970s cite America’s high rate of gun-related crimes compared to other industrial countries as a driving factor behind gun control legislation. Statistics like this prompted New York City to successfully reduce its crime rates by putting gun control laws into action.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays