Preview

Should The Second Amendment Be Illegal

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Second Amendment Be Illegal
Fewer issues grab American’s attention more than the issue of crime and violence.
This is easily linked to the availability of guns. The debate on whether guns are a tradition and a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution or whether they are a dangerous contribution to the problems at hand make for an explosive argument. With a major outbreak of violence in our country, some people think that if we repeal the Second Amendment it would solve the problem. These people have two reasons; One, is the rising of violence amongst teenagers, the second, is their interpretation of the Second Amendment. The side opposing these views use arguments like how it would be impossible to repeal the Second Amendment, and we have a long history
…show more content…
The amendment came out of the deep-seated fear of a National or standing army. Originally they also limited the National Army to 840 men. This idea led to the true reason for the amendment. The need for a state militia was the right guaranteed in the amendment. In short, it was declared "necessary" in order to have a state military force to protect the security of the state. The amendment issued the right of militia 's and for hunters to have guns which in that day depended on for survival. Now Americans have the right to defend their homes, we dare not change that, nor does anybody question that the Constitution protects the right of hunters. Hunting is a sport for recreation, but assault weapons are not recreational, and are surely in need of regulations just like …show more content…
These are sacred words. It is obvious that crime is a major problem in Today 's Society. Many precautions have been taken as voters demand that the government do something about the rising crime and violence in America, but is repealing the Second Amendment the Answer? No it is not. We must think of the aftermath of such a repeal, many people would not stand by and let you take their guns. They would take arms to defend the very right being taken away. If the right to keep and bear arms had not been exercised when George Washington led the colonies to victory over the English Crown, our Constitution would not exist as it is today, that is why the Second Amendment is such a sacred one, it is the basis for which the ideas of this country stands upon. Would people really sit by as the Government takes action and becomes Tyrannical? In addition to the Second Amendment most people are unaware that the 14th or Civil Rights Amendment also guarantees the right of freedmen to bear arms. Do advocates against the Second Amendment suggest that we repeal that amendment too? Many Americans would not agree with that. Furthermore it is obvious that it would be impossible to repeal the Second Amendment there are other ways to deal with rising crime and violence. Obviously military type weapons should be available to the public; but with strict regulations such as background checks, even a DNA test. But Military weapons are only designed with one thing in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Second Amendment is unnecessary and should be repealed” a fair statement and one that I strongly agree with. The second amendment states that all man has the right to bear arms or own a gun. In July 4,1776 North America got its independence from the British Empire. Next our founding fathers came together and created the Bill of Rights. During the eighteenth century America was a young and newly independent country. In the 1770s they needed to demonstrate their strength as a country. Also, Americans were driven to protect their lands from countries that have a stronger government and army. But in this century,America is a stronger country with a very strong army and government. Considering that American now has a strong military with…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to repeal the 2nd amendment, a new amendment must take its place, which those supporting the repeal of the 2nd have no replacement for, two-thirds of the legislative bodies of the U.S. Congress must accept it, and lastly, thirty-eight out of fifty states must vote in agreement. Therefore it's almost impossible, and very very difficult for thirty-eight consecutive states to vote yes for the removal of their protection; it would be as one giving a burglar a key to their house, but in this case giving up a right many have died for in the 1700s. Though the government may be removing the guns from the hands of its citizens, the violence still remains. In fact, the removal of the constitutional principle was proved to be futile when a similar repeal in handguns occurred in the United Kingdom in England and Wales in the year of 1996, when a “50 percent increase in homicide rates” occurred, the firearm homicide rate doubling between 1996 and 2002, causing more problems in a country with fewer tensions than that of the U.S. and forcing one to ponder on whether the repeal would truly save people, or put them in more…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those two things seem to coincide with each other. Lately on the news there have been a number of mass shootings, terrorist attacks, violence in neighborhood, etcetera. As the number of these crimes seem to happen more often throughout the years, peoples fight or flight instincts tend to kick in, and they feel like they have to do what they need to do in order to protect themselves. And that usually results in people's fight response being activated, and wanting to be feel like they are able to keep themselves and their family safe end up with them going out and getting a gun. As of last October, the Gallup poll was taken and stemmed out into saying that 63% of Americans believe that having a gun in their household makes them feel a whole lot safer than having a home without a gun. According to the Pew Research Center Survey only 37% of adults own a gun in their household. While the numbers may appear to not seem like a lot, as a researcher it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of individuals who do have a gun in their possession due to not everyone answering the survey on whether or not they have acquired a gun. So the big question for the people and the government are "Is the right to keep and bear arms a civil right?" and " Should we have restrictions when obtaining a gun?" So the present today debate on the Second Amendment main focus is on the protection of an individual right to bear arms or is it a right than can only be protected by the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." These are the words of the second amendment as written by our forefathers. Many laws have since been passed on the right to bear arms. Currently laws are being drawn up to give the right to citizens to sue gun manufacturers. If this is passed who will be next, car manufacturers, toy companies? The cause of a crime needs to be addressed, not the instrument used. Stronger enforcement of the existing laws would help with gun crimes.…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment is part of the constitution and is something that should never be taken away, and can’t be taken away. The amendment says that “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The first 10 amendments to our Constitution protect our most basic rights from being stripped away by an overly zealous government, including rights that all Americans hold dear. The United States Bill of Rights plays a central role in American law and government, and remains a fundamental symbol of the freedoms and culture of the nation. One of the original fourteen copies of the U.S. Bill of Rights is on public display at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. This amendment and right give us the citizens a chance to defend ourselves from danger from not only criminals but also a foreign attack.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States Constitution was created on September 17, 1787 as the supreme law of the land. This document outlines the ten amendments which guarantee certain rights that American citizens will always have. One of these freedoms and possibly the most important is the right to keep and bear arms. As written in the Constitution, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). Whatever the purpose these guns are meant to serve it is clear that the right to own them cannot be impaired.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amending the Constitution, including amending an amendment, is a necessary task in order to fit the needs that America has today. Many debates have been started in relation to the amount of violence that is associated with guns. There is such easy access to them now that there have been too many issues. There is not a need for people to bring the task of protecting themselves with high-powered weaponry when there are trained officers now. People in support of the Second Amendment argue that they needs weapons to protect themselves from the government, when violent forms of protest are not allowed. Overall, the Second Amendment in the United States Constitution needs to be amended in order to suffice for the type of America there is…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nra Gun Reform

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Our Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights had created a virtual war over guns and gun ownership in the United States for more than two centuries. It reads The Second Amendment provides: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It is the only amendment written with a purported purpose. The only one with a preamble or perhaps an observation that; a well-regulated militia is a necessity for the security of a free state, and an objective or a legality that: the right…

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One major modern-day political issue our country is suffering from are gun control laws. Gun controls law now are much different than what they were many years ago; because of school shootings like Columbine and Sandy Hook, there have now been security guards and metal detectors in schools to stop more school shootings from happening. But just because of that, it won't stop misuse of guns all together, so this is why a lot of people are arguing about getting gun laws under…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why some people are so vociferous about what they believe is necessary to achieve a less violent society. In addition to the Second Amendment dispute, liberals view it as reassurance that, “the federal government would not disband their militias” (Wasserman 1); henceforth not permitting the right for every individual to bear arms. They also conceived that when the Second Amendment addressed Americans as, “the people,” they do not mean individuals themselves, but the “people as a whole” (Wasserman 1). Some also proposed individuals do not need guns for protection and that, “it is the role of the local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military” (Student News Daily 1).The people place great confidence within our government to defend us against any threats to the American people. It is also believed that if the militia had enough firearms to protect our nation, then the personal ownership of guns for “self-defense” would not be needed. Even if law enforcement agencies were the only ones able to bear arms, there would still be the concern of police brutality or abuse of authority. Another promoted conjecture is that, “additional gun control laws are necessary to stop gun violence and limit the ability of criminals to obtain guns” (Student News Daily 1). It is a widespread belief that the more laws the legislature passes on…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The application of natural rights allows every citizen of the United States of America to have equal and inalienable protections from the government that created them. Although debated on where the line is drawn, Americans know that they have the Freedom of Speech, the Right to Refuse the Quartering of Soldiers, and the Right to Bear Arms. Actually the last one should go more like this; “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” substantially different than the grotesquely abbreviated citation we are used to hearing. The amendment was designed to ensure a very specific circumstance: the people are allowed access to weapons in order to physically defend themselves against the hand of a tyrannical government.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thousands even cling to the idea that guns provide safety, while citing the second amendment. But that safety they speak of does elude us as a society which guns are the threat to that safety. Also, I feel that the second amendment is also being taken out of context regarding the issue of gun control. The text of the second amendment reads, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. amend. II). Society must remember that this amendment was written over 200 years ago, when the United States was a brand-new country without a standing army to defend themselves. Today the United States does have a standing army, navy, air force, and police forces, so we as a country do not need a militia to defend. But even with this amendment gun controls still won’t take away the rights of people to buy a firearm, sell, and…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the school shooting in Connecticut, the debate about gun control has been the topic for discussion. The reaction all over the country is "change or repeal the Second Amendment." The Second Amendment is one of the reasons we have more guns than any country on the planet. Some people believe that banning guns will decrease the number of crimes committed in the United States because they believe guns are the roots of all crime, and banning guns will decrease the murder rates and give everyone a peace of mind. While others believe that abolishing guns would not change anything. People would still get murdered, robbers would still rob, and it would not make people feel safer, it could in fact do the opposite. Appealing the second Amendment will not sufficiently work unless the government was to go through every home and building- through peoples personal belongings- and take every gun they see. Guns are not the problem, people are. What we need is reliability from the government, stricter regulations on gun control, and better examples set.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights recognizes and protects the citizens of America's’ natural, basic rights. What happens when the rights that the government are supposed to be protecting, begin to be ignored? Fourteen words protect all of our guaranteed rights as citizens of the united states-“...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” That is why gun control violates the second amendment.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, our forefathers created the second amendment for a reason. Times have not changed enough that we can completely feel safe in our homes. Many people believe that by banning guns it would be harder for dangerous people to get guns. But the fact is criminals will still be able to acquire guns. Banning of guns, as shown above by the U.S. Department of Justice, would not reduce crime. Hunters do have the right to hunt for food and pleasure. Americans do have the right to protect their home and family. As an American you have the right to bear arms. But not everyone should have the right to own a gun. Gun control, not banning of guns needs to be the…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays