Preview

Nuclear Proliferation Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Proliferation Essay Example
Dalton Cole
Government
October 12, 2009
Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear proliferation is an important world issue. It is the spreading of nuclear weapons technology to rogue states, and can be very hazardous to our country and many others. It is a tough task, but we are doing everything we can to stop nuclear weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists. Recently, A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan’s nuclear bomb, has revealed that he has been selling nuclear weapons technology to Libya and other rogue states. This revelation added more fear with the attack of 9/11, envisioning nuclear destruction. President Bush had many thoughts on how to help eliminate nuclear proliferation and treated it as a very important subject. “Our message to proliferators must be consistent and must be clear. We will find you, and we’re not going to rest until you’re stopped.” Many believe a plan of attack is the best way to stop nuclear proliferation. It is true, that if men like A.Q. Khan are eliminated, the threat of proliferation will be greatly reduced. However, experts are more concerned with the safety of our own nuclear weapons. Wade Boese, research director of Arms Control Association, says “if this is such an urgent priority, why not fund it like it is and recognize we’re in a race with the terrorists?” when speaking about the safeguarding of our nuclear weapons. If properly secured and kept secret, the problems of nuclear proliferation are definitely minimized. We need to keep this deadly information out of the hands of terrorists at any cost. Another method in the attempt to eliminate nuclear proliferation as much as possible is the Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is an agreement to abandon the use and creation of nuclear weapons in exchange for help in developing nuclear power for peaceful uses. The only countries who have never signed are India, Israel, and Pakistan, which have all developed nuclear weapons. North Korea also signed, but later

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, gave a speech on the issues of nuclear weapons in his speech, “Atoms for Peace” (1953). This speech was given at the United Nation General Assembly. Eisenhower’s purpose in this speech is to inform the people of the United States and the United Nations, that they want a peaceful outcome with other countries that are building nuclear weapons. Throughout his speech he gives a sense of peace. He explains that the United States government will do whatever they can so that all of us can live in peace. Eisenhower gives caution and concern, as he was worried for the U.S. safety.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regardless of General Grove’s speech to the world in 1962 that the use of the world’s most destructive weapon was completely justified, there are still many main factors which were available to the United States and its allies. This marked the birth of the nuclear age which was to last for decades to come. It brought death and destruction…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time I hear a word "War" as a child, I still have to hear a word "Nuclear Weapons". From that time, I didn't know what they are. But when I grow up, I learned that Nuclear Weapons are the device that can destroy many people or one small country. So I believe that They are the killing device. From these reasons…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the main hegemon present in today’s world, we the United States live in a unipolar system of power. Since the end of the Cold War (which ended the bipolar system with the USSR), the United States has been the most important state in overlooking international issues. One of the major issues present in international politics is Iran’s uranium enrichment program in which its focus is to develop nuclear weapons. We formally ended civil relations with Iran in 2002 when we declared Iran as an axis of evil, along with Iraq and North Korea.1 Although relations have been severed, there exist many approaches in which we the United States can attempt to resolve or at the least improve the situation. Based on extensive research and the development of the problem over the course of the last few years, I believe it is in our best interest to pursue a course of containment and deterrence, as opposed to a military strike that would destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Iran has slowly begun to reconsider the implications of its nuclear program, giving the United States, in coordination with the P5+1 (five permanent members of the Security Council and Germany) an opportunity to step in.2 As we see this weakness emerging in Iran, we can take the necessary measures by negotiating in order to deter and contain the nuclear program in Iran.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The core purpose for acquiring nuclear weapons in a society is not to cause violence, but rather deter violence, which is a viable fit to any country using it for those specific purposes. This fact is proven by all the countries that already possess nuclear weapons. These weapons are utilized the same way that bouncers are used at clubs. To secure the vicinity and keep unwanted people out. Keeping this in mind, we must take into consideration the Non-Proliferation Treaty aka NPT. The NPT acts as a repellent of nuclear technology to countries as its primal objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology and to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of energy. With these restrictions, only 5 states were recognized as nuclear weapons from the 190 parties that were involved in the NPT. The United States, Russia,…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether one concludes a positive or negative answer to this question the argumentation would benefit if emanating from Kenneth Waltz reasoning, that in 1981 provoked a debate that until this day is engaging scholars and strategists. Waltz’s positive answer to the question stood, and stands, in sharp contrast to the general public understanding that proliferation of nuclear weapons is dangerous and undesirable. The classical debate that Waltz initiated has been focused on whether nuclear weapons create stability or not. Many scholars have acknowledged the need to broaden the focus and taking other factor into account, for example implications nuclear weapons have for economy or environment (Knopf 2004: 42-43). Because of the limit of this paper I will build my argument within the scope of the classical debate in order to answer the question.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    nuclear weapon

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IntroduceThough after the second World War some countries have revised their nuclear weapons programme, nuclear weapons still today are considered to be an established currency of politics and security. While the nuclear weapons states have agreed on a legally binding commitment to nuclear disarmament, they continue to rely heavily on such weapons in their security doctrines and continue to invest and modernise their arsenals. The way towards nuclear disarmament has many different paths and there are several approaches.…

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays