Preview

Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?
Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?

Amyn Jivani

6099660

POL1102 D – Politics and Globalization

Professor: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

Moderator: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

War has commenced since the late 1800’s with over 150 conflicts and 600 battles occurring, and still taking place on a global perspective. People who witness war firsthand tend to feel that the most memorable moments are the moments that people wish to remember the least. The dilemma faced in society currently is the idea of Iran having the capability of possessing a nuclear weapon. Doing so will make them the tenth nuclear power in the world, adding them to a list involving; The United States, Russia, United Kingdoms, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel . The major focus of today’s discussion is on Iran’s pronouncement to go nuclear. The first half of this paper will attempt to depict the pros for Iran receiving a nuke, and the cons of receiving a nuke. This will enable us to gain a non-biased view on the situation in Iran. The second half of this paper will summarize why ‘we’ cannot live with a nuclear Iran.
The core purpose for acquiring nuclear weapons in a society is not to cause violence, but rather deter violence, which is a viable fit to any country using it for those specific purposes. This fact is proven by all the countries that already possess nuclear weapons. These weapons are utilized the same way that bouncers are used at clubs. To secure the vicinity and keep unwanted people out. Keeping this in mind, we must take into consideration the Non-Proliferation Treaty aka NPT. The NPT acts as a repellent of nuclear technology to countries as its primal objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology and to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of energy. With these restrictions, only 5 states were recognized as nuclear weapons from the 190 parties that were involved in the NPT. The United States, Russia,



Bibliography: "Can we live with a nuclear-armed Iran? | The Current with Anna Maria Tremonti | CBC Radio." CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment Kids Docs Radio TV.  Masur, Louis P.. "The Washington Monthly - The Magazine - We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran." The Washington Monthly.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    In both cases, protagonists were influenced by the particular events, their domestic and geo-political state of affairs and the signals delivered and counter offers made from parties involved. This essay analyses the scenario, role of actors, and description of the outcomes of the two crises. The paper argues that the advent of the nuclear age, following World War II in 1945, shaped contemporary international relations. What makes the Cuban Missile Crisis fundamentally different was precisely because it occurred during nuclear age. This essay will outline some of the concepts such as deterrence, mutual assured destruction doctrine, and the concept of balance of terror to justify why the nuclear age has shaped events after World War II. The essay concludes by affirming the need to rethink and revisit the role of nuclear weapons in the 21st century.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolfsthal. B. John. (july 2008). American Foreign Policy Project Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions and American Security. Wolfsthal, J. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://americanforeignpolicy.org/iran-key-documents/key-supporting-analyses…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Non Proliferation act of 1968 was created to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. 85 percent of the world’s countries signed it. Non nuclear countries agreed to not make or accept nukes from anyone. Countries that had them could not build or share them. The International Atomic Energy Agency was created by the UN to inspect countries to ensure nuclear facilities were operating under peaceful terms but the NPT hasn 't been entirely successful. India and Pakistan tested nukes in 1998 and Israel 's nuclear capability is an open secret. None of those countries signed the NPT in 1968. North Korea did sign the treaty in 1970 but violated it in the 1990s when it started developing nukes and more recently in 2006 when they tested one.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wrong Strategy On Iran Author: Ray Takeyh, Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies September 10, 2004The Washington Post: http://www.cfr.org/iran/wrong-strategy-iran/p7323…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crist, David. The Twilight War: The Secret History of America’s Thirty-Year Conflict with Iran. New York: The Penguin Press, 2012.…

    • 7054 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found the book written by Hooman Majd, to be very informative and interesting, as it exposed a new view of a country, that has always been viewed as anti-western, anti-democracy and dictatorial. This reflection paper will take a look at how the book by Hooman Majd, portrays Islamic Republic of Iran, and why the country and Khomeini seem to oppose western influence and democracy. The outside world and many western countries regard Iran as a dictatorial country that wants to disrupt world peace, through the production of nuclear weapons.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If some other country was to obtain these weapons and we had none, we would be at their mercy. There are a lot of maniacs out there who have the ability to rise to power and gain support, just like Hitler, Stalin, or Mussolini did. Once these kinds of leaders gain power, they can obtain nuclear weapons. Even though none of them did, they had the power to, and the only reason they didn’t is because they didn’t live in the nuclear age. However, we were still watching these leaders to make sure they weren’t making weapons of mass destruction. This proved to be a waste of time because they never did, but even while we were watching them, Hitler was still able to create more innovative and useful weapons that he…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, It was believed that Nuclear weapons are the symbol of power.Many big countries like China, The United States or Russia. They all have them.And that's going to make other small countries want to have them. So they try every way to make nuclear weapons even, they have to lose a lot of money.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why do these countries feel the need to posses so many nuclear warheads? Dominance, power and paranoia. Although some of their weapons may simply just be left over from the Cold War, this is not an excuse. They could have easily been destroyed by now. Countries like Russia and the United States crave power. In modern times the most important substance to guarantee power is weapons. Countries in possession of nuclear weapons use them to scare and intimidate other nations. One day this could backfire and the consequences would be deadly. Take North Korea and America. When Kim-Jong Un tried to invade South Korea,…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays