Preview

law- food/beverage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
law- food/beverage
1. What is the Guest – Innkeeper Relationship?
An innkeeper owes certain duties to those who use the hote's facilities - Right to be Received.
If propery is stolen, te extent of the hotel's liability will be directly impacted by whether or not the property owner is a guest.
A hotel owes a duty to guests but not to others who refeain from insulting or humiliating them - Right to be entertained
The outcome of many lawsuits turns on whether or not the plaintiff is a guest.

2. Who is considered to be a Guest? How is the Guest – Innkeeper relationship a Contract?
As a general rule people are not guests unless they require accommodations
Poeple who register at the hotel for rooms are guests
People in the hotel for some other reason do not qualify
Thus, a transient becomes a guest upon entering a hotel intending to procure overnight accommodations where the innkeeper has a room available. (Plan to stay overnight, rooms available).
Innkeeper/guest relationship is Contractual

3. What situations Terminate the Guest – Innkeeper relationship?

Contracted time for the room has elapsed
Bill not paid when due
Due notice is given to vacate the hotel
The bill has been paid

4. Under what 3 exceptions would the Innkeeper not have “Absolute Liability” for guest’s goods under common law?
The guest's own negligence:
- Carelessness by the guest (leaving door open/unlocked)
Act of Public Enemies
- War or Terrorism
Acts of God
- Hurrianes, floods, earthquakes etc.

5. What is Bailment and the Elements involved in Bailment?

-The transfer of personal property from an owner to another, with the consideration that it will be returned in the same condition.
*Coat Check

Elements:
Personal property only transfer of physial possession - Bailor to Bailee
Acceptance of Possession by the Bailee
Bailment Agreement - Bailee will return the property to the Bailor upon request.

Bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor:
-

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Week 3

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. What are the elements of negligence that Mr. Margreiter will need to prove against the hotel in order to win his case? List the five elements here. (Points : 5)…

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    d: The following is the reason. The advertisement and website created an express warranty that the trip would include all expenses, three meals a day, and a room with a queen bed.Jones entered into the contract based on a mistake of material fact which the hotel knew to be untrue and under the UCC written disclaimers must be conspicuously displayed to be valid.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Cooke J Law of Tort Ninth Edition, 9thed, 2009, C1 General Principle of Tort Law. P6…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ii) If one is the owner or operator, liability may attach even if some other…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lease

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    USE & OCCUPANCY OF PREMISES. The Tenant agrees to use the Premises for Residential purposes only and for no other purpose and not to allow the Prtemises to be occupied or otherwise used by anyone other than the Tenant and the following persons listed below:…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case I have chosen is Meras Engineering, INC., et al. (Plaintiffs) V. CH20, INC., et al., (Defendants). Meras Engineering is a provider of water treatment solutions. They develop products that treat industrial and agricultural water applications. CH20 is a similar company that provides clients with chemicals that control the biological fouling in cooling towers. Rich Beriner and Jay Sughroue were employed by CH20 and signed a non-compete agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O, INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ld 201 Lvl 2 Care

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | |1.1 | |The hotel model is where staff take over the service users life, the service user has no say or |…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kelly V. Movie Theater

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kelly went to the Movie Theater to see a movie. Hence, Kelly is a social guest entering with Movie Theater’s permission and thus an invitee. Because Kelly was an invitee, The Movie Theater owed a duty to Kelly to inspect the premises, discover, and remove any known dangers.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 2.03(c) does not preclude Ms. Fleshman’s claim for negligent undertaking because section 2.03(3) applies only to those responsible for providing alcohol to others. First, the Radcliffes were not providing alcohol to the party, in fact they made no affirmative action to make alcohol available, and so do not fall under the purview of the statute. Second,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the basis of the premise liability claim, our client has a case against the hotel. The premise liability claim is based on common law principles of negligence and derives from an establishment's lack of supervision, care, or control of the premises. RESTATMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §344 (1965). According to the premise liability claim, a tavern owner has a duty to protect his patrons, and thus be liable for negligence, if the following applies: control over a dangerous and defective condition; the owner had knowledge or should have had knowledge of the injury causing condition; and the harm suffered was a foreseeable result of that condition.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    t&t unit 1

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Accommodation is where people who are travelling from another country or within the UK would be staying this would be Hotels which would be serviced or non serviced rooms.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Boella M & Pannet A, 1999, Principles of Hospitality Law, Second Edition, Continuum, New York…

    • 3821 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liability

    • 5215 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Occupiers' liability is a field of tort law, codified in statute, which concerns the duty of care that those who occupy (through ownership or lease) real property owe to people who visit or trespass. It deals with liability that may arise from accidents caused by the defective or dangerous condition of the premises. By the expression “Premises” in the context of this topic is meant, not only, land and buildings but also vehicles, railway carriages, scaffolding and the like. The expression thus includes certain type of movable properties the distinguishing features of which, speaking generally, under the present topic is that the defendant remains in control of them and the plaintiff suffers injury by entering into them. The liability of occupiers of premises, except in relation to trespassers, is now governed under the English Law by the Occupiers Liability Act, 1957 which was enacted as a result of the report of a Law Reform Committee in 1952. The liability towards trespassers has also undergone considerable change by a liberal judicial approach in recent years and later by the Occupiers Liability Act, 1984.…

    • 5215 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ethic

    • 2620 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The action the writer took of ‘inform the guests’ in broad view of corporate responsibility respects the stakeholders. It shows honesty which is considered as ethical in virtue theory, and theories of Kant and Ross. From Ross’ theory, the loyalty is also mentioned in duties of fidelity from 7 prima facie obligations. In long-term view, the shareholders will be satisfied with increasing profit. In utilitarianism of consequentialist view, more people are considered to be happy. The proactive action of providing accurate information on advertisement lets the hotel be an ethically good business based on Solomon’s 3’C’s of business ethics.…

    • 2620 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The incident involved Leslea an employee of the hotel and Mr Toxopersonas a guest. Mr Toxopersonas had informed the hotel that he was a diabetic and needed special meal requests. Leslea, at the time of employment accidently mixed up meal orders resulting in Mr Toxopersonas receiving coco pops; Mr Toxopersonas consumed the coco pops of which he passed out and several losses occurred from the incident. The Law of Negligence appears relevant in this situation. In (Gerbic and Miller 2010 P.430) the three principles to determine Negligence are: i) Was the plaintiff owed a duty of care? ii) Is the defendant in breach of that duty? iii) Was the loss caused by the breach and was it foreseeable? It will also need to be determined as to whether or not Jenny the owner is vicariously liable for the actions of her employee and if Mr Toxopersona is responsible for a proportion of his own negligence.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics