Preview

Juvenile Death Penalty Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Death Penalty Essay Example
Death at 18? One of the most controversial issues in the country today is addressed in the question, "Should the death penalty be applied to juveniles, and if so how young is too young?" The death penalty has been in the United States for many, many years, and the United States still has yet to figure out how to solve all its dilemmas and whether or not the penalty is right or wrong. Debates about the use of the death penalty for juveniles have grown more intense because of the recent demand for harsher punishment for serious and violent crimes.
The death penalty has been in effect for many years and although some states have ruled it unconstitutional, it is still being used in many states today. The very first juvenile ever to be put to death in America was Thomas Graunger. He was found guilty for bestiality in Plymouth Colony, Massachusetts, in early 1642 and faced execution by hanging (Cothern). At this time, there were no laws defining the age at which a child could be executed. In fact, history records child executions as young as seven and as old as eighteen. Today there are many different laws which regulate who can be executed, including laws regarding age limitations. One of these such laws occurred in 1988 when, as the result of the Thompson vs. Oklahoma case, the United States Supreme Court decided that the 8th Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment made it unconstitutional to execute anyone who had committed a crime under the age of sixteen (JVD in Context). This case has made it clear that no matter what the criminal justice law is in any state, the age at which the death penalty can be implemented cannot be below sixteen. Presently, twenty-eight states have chosen the minimum age of eighteen, five states have the minimum age of seventeen, and fourteen states have chosen the minimum age of sixteen (Strieb). The overall reasoning behind the age limit in criminal sentencing is because of the overwhelming belief that being that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historically, children have been regarded as constitutionally different from adults. This fact is evident in the way past cases have been decided. Certain juvenile characteristics such as their “ immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences” illustrates the clear discrepancy between children and adults. Furthermore, the majority contend that instances that call for punishment as severe as life imprisonment without parole will be exceedingly uncommon and rare. Requiring that all juvenile convicted of homicide are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole regardless of age or other mitigating factors violates the principle of proportionality.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virginia (2002) when the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, there has been a shift in the use of the juvenile death penalty that reflects society’s “evolving standards of decency.” A national consensus has developed since Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) in which the majority of states do not support the use of the death penalty for juveniles. Currently, 30 states prohibit the juvenile death penalty, and 12 of those states have banned the death penalty completely. In addition, since 1989, five states that previously allowed the juvenile death penalty have banned its use, either through legislation or through judicial…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Children make mistakes from time to time, and haven’t you ever heard the term “we are only human.” Well now that’s we are in 2013, we can acknowledge the fact that locking up a teen for life without parole violates our constitutions eighth amendment. Took us a while, but with the last three court cases, (Graham vs. Florida, Miller vs. Alabama, Roper vs. Simmons) they have all helped us shed a different look on Juvenile punishment in the past seven years. With the help of scientific research we can distinguish the fact that children don’t have the maturity set to make rational decisions on their own, are often pushed by peer pressure, adolescents don’t tend to consider future consequences, and the child’s vulnerability to external influences. These traits are what the court found to set children apart from adults and are to be handed down a differential punishment than adults when it comes to such serious crimes such as life without parole or the death penalty.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the Juvenile Court system and its intended purposes, the history of capital punishment being used against minors, court decisions both in limiting capital punishment for youthful offenders, as well as upholding states rights to sentence juveniles to death. Most importantly, we will analyze possible factors that contributed to the decision of Roper v Simmons such as the international community's opposition of the juvenile death penalty and the majority consensus of the American public in outlawing this practice.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article discussed a dispute between Christopher simmons and a missouri prosecutor and the main question is Whether or not the death penalty is unconstitutional for minors, and whether that decision is for the states or the federal government to…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty for juveniles is a serious injustice issue. The death penalty for juveniles began with the English common law and the first who was executed was out of Massachusetts in 1642. Over the course of history, children could be tried in court as early as seven years of age. Children are vulnerable to so many different things throughout their young lives. These things involve peer pressure, stress, controlling their emotions, and more. More than likely, juveniles sentence to the death penalty come from homes where they are already physically, mentally, and emotionally abused, low income backgrounds, and other types of unstable environments. In the juvenile justice system, most believe the juveniles can be rehabilitated with effective counseling and mentoring programs. Sentencing a child to the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. These children do not think of the crimes alone. There…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statistics shows that juveniles that commit first degree murder get life in prison without parole. Our supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the eighth Amendment “ ban on cruel or unusual punishment .” Juveniles are still young, there is still a chance to make them better people by rehabilitation . So minors still have the opportunity to contribute to society even though, they have made poor decisions in the past. Nothing ever justifies death no matter the circumstances or situation you are in. The U.S supreme court should not rule mandatory life in prison for juveniles who have committed murder.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juveniles who are under the age of 18 cannot be given the death penalty. In Roper v. Simmons in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause prohibited a state from executing a juvenile who was under the age of 18 when the capital crime was committed. Insane at the time of execution. Ford v. Wainright, 1986, the court held that the eighth amendment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who is insane at the time of execution. Mental Retardation. Atkins v. Virginia, U.S. 2002, and the court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment prohibited imposition of the death penalty on defendants with mental retardation. In 2004, the court held in Tennard v. Dretke evidence of mental retardation is inherently mitigating in a capital case, whether or not the defendant has shown a nexus between his mental capacity and the crime committed.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our current criminal justice system frequently places juveniles into adult prisons and until just recently had mandatory life sentences for some juvenile crimes. The much divided Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences were unconstitutional and as a result has sparked vigorous debate as many have joined the conversation regarding how juveniles are treated in prison and if our current system is working. Despite the fierce debate, current science and statistics seems to favor one side over the other. The current United States legal system is clearly flawed as alternative systems are superior, the current system adversely affects juveniles and their chance at rehabilitation, and recent findings on juvenile brain…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniless Death Penalty

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I think of troubled youth that are influential still in their behaviors, but still know the difference between right and wrong. The same as well with a 16 or 17 year old juvenile. Many, when asked this, would think of their own children and see nothing wrong. That their children do know what is right and what is wrong. The above juveniles mentioned in the cases probably did know that what they were doing was wrong, but had a criminal past behind them that fueled these heinous acts. For their actions, they were sentenced to death. Many feel that the sentence imposed be wrong due to the ages of the defendants. Yet, the states overruled them in saying that the Eighth Amendment was not violated. I support the death penalty, and feel that the court followed all procedures and the sentence imposed was just. In conclusion, I feel that the punishment should fit the crime, and the punishment in these cases has.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice Reform

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Controversies dealing with juveniles’ age in which they can be charged as adults, giving them life sentences in prison without parole, the application of neuroscience, and the roles both the federal and state governments have played in shaping the policies towards justice reform have been discussed at length for the better half of United States (U.S.) History (755). Dating as far back as 1825, the United States of America has delved into the topic of juvenile justice (755). Today, advocates of the youth and victims’ rights still provide strong interest in criminal justice reform. From lobbying for light sentencing standards for the youth, to making them accountable for their actions, the controversies and arguments towards reforming juvenile…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A juvenile is a young person who are below the age of 18 accused. Based on some cases, they should also be considered as an adult. In June 25, 2012; the Supreme Court has made a ruling that juveniles who commit murders cannot be given life in prison. Four justices strongly disagree to this ruling saying how juveniles should always be punished for their crimes from how heinous they are. In my opinion, I believe that juveniles should not receive life in prison under certain circumstances. A family’s background, the brain works, and why these juveniles don’t deserve a life sentence without parole.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays