Preview

Sentencing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sentencing
Sentencing
Christine Kelly Doty
Criminal Law
3/1/13

Proportionality is a general principle in law which covers several special concepts. The concept of proportionality is used as a criterion of fairness and justice in statutory interpretation processes, especially in constitutional law, as a logical method intended to assist in discerning the correct balance between the restriction imposed by a corrective measure and the severity of the nature of the prohibited act. Within municipal law it is used to convey the idea that the punishment of an offender should fit the crime. Juveniles who are under the age of 18 cannot be given the death penalty. In Roper v. Simmons in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause prohibited a state from executing a juvenile who was under the age of 18 when the capital crime was committed. Insane at the time of execution. Ford v. Wainright, 1986, the court held that the eighth amendment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who is insane at the time of execution. Mental Retardation. Atkins v. Virginia, U.S. 2002, and the court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment prohibited imposition of the death penalty on defendants with mental retardation. In 2004, the court held in Tennard v. Dretke evidence of mental retardation is inherently mitigating in a capital case, whether or not the defendant has shown a nexus between his mental capacity and the crime committed. Blakely v. Washington, 2004, applied the reasoning of apprend, which involved specific statutory language the permitted a judge to find facts that increased the maximum sentence for a crime, to state sentencing systems. Blakely pled guilty to second degree kidnapping and use of firearm. After three days of hearing before the trial judge, the defendant was sentenced to a prison term more than three years longer than the maximum sentence for the crime charged, based on the trial judge’s finding that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    3. Beck, Allan, Darrell Gilliard, Lawrence Greenfeld, Caroline Harlow, Thomas Hester, Louis Jankowski, Tracy Schnell, James Stephan, and Danielle Morton. 1993. Survey of State Prison Inmates. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fines are one of the oldest forms of punishment, the use of fines as criminal sanctions suffers from built in inequities and a widespread failure to collect them (Schmalleger, 2011). Fines can deprive offenders of the proceeds of criminal activity, and also promote rehabilitation by enforcing economic responsibility (Schmalleger, 2011). People have to pay fines when they break minor laws, such as driving while intoxicated, reckless driving, disturbing the peace, public drunkenness, and vandalism (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In conclusion, this note will show that the United States Supreme Court is likely to clarify its decision in Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), and affirm the decision of the Florida courts to uphold the life sentence.4…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Punishment can be broke down into four fundamental objectives. These objectives are deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation, and incapacitation.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans are so use to the traditional sentencing and the options that have been probation, fines, and going to prison. Concerning the way things were done in the past to now it has changed drastically. Sentencing philosophies, or the justifications on which various sentencing strategies are based, are manifestly intertwined with issues of religion, morals, values, and emotions. Talking about philosophers in history the values they held deep social values.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the US constitution, the 8th amendment prohibits the federal government from imposing cruel and unusual punishment. Is convicting a juvenile as an adult and to life in prison overturning the 8th amendment. This punishment is unusual because juveniles are not adults but they’re being treated as adults. In Dontae Brown’s article, “Life Sentence: Is Life Without Parole for Juveniles Cruel and Unusual Punishment?”, Brown claims that trying a juvenile as an adult is inhumane. If the death penalty for juvenile has been revoked because it went against the 8th amendment, why can't life sentences for juveniles be revoked as well? Brown reassures that juveniles brains aren't as mature as adults and that the Supreme Court should consider what is happening in the juvenile’s daily life because it may affect one’s opinion on them. The Supreme Court should take this information into consideration before deciding on something that is unconstitutional. Although convicting juveniles to life sentences is unconstitutional, maybe for some cases it's for the…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My theory for the reasoning of punishment has two main goals which are to provide justice for the victims and a lesson to the convicted. When a judge sits in preparation to initiate sentencing they have to go through numerous thought processes because of the uniqueness of every case. Considerations such as what are they trying to accomplish with the punishment and who would benefit from such a sentence. General factors like the age of the convicted and the heinousness of the crime committed matters as well. When a criminal is sentence it is reasoned by retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, or rehabilitation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Supreme Court ruled is as a “cruel and unusual punishment,” the sentence if fair because the convicted committed an act of murder that took away another person’s life. Such an example is Greg Ousley, who purposely murdered his parents and planned the murder days before he committed it (Greg Ousely Is Sorry, 9). Unlike previous scenarios mentioned, Ousley purposely planned for the murder of his parents. Despite the fact that he was still a teenager when he committed the murder, he had an intention to silence his parents and killed both of them in cold blood. This greatly differs from the previous convicted juveniles who accidentally killed their victims. Juveniles that have motives such as Ousley should be convicted as an adult and be sentenced a life in prison because, despite their age, they can think and act like an adult. Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision of disallowing “teenagers” from “cruel and unusual punishments” should be overturned on certain cases, because, as seen in Ousely, some teenagers are capable and can plan murders beforehand. This not only reveals that certain teenagers can plan beforehand, but that they can think like adults in order to murder someone with…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller vs Alabama

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of mandatory life sentences without parole enforced upon persons aged fourteen and younger found guilty of homicide. The court declared unconstitutional a compulsory sentence of life without parole for children. The states have been barred from routinely imposing sentences based on the crime committed. There is a requirement for individual consideration of the child life circumstance or the defendant status as a child. The court rejected the definite ban on life sentences without parole. This is because in some cases the instances may be uncommon, but jurors can find irreparably corrupted children. The Supreme Court declined to decide the subject whether there is age below which children with life sentences without parole is unconstitutional.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Children in Adult Prisons

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment protects citizens against cruel and unusual punishment. The Fourteenth Amendment protects citizens from being deprived the rights of life, liberty, and property by the states. These Amendments were not considered when sentencing children in several states. In several cases that did not involve homicide, very young children were given life sentences in prison without the possibility of parole. In the case of Sullivan versus Florida, Joe Sullivan was 13 years old when convicted of sexual battery. The state of Florida sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the murder of Uma Opee Mr. Dents is found guilty in the following elements. The elements are Homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary and crimes related to drugs.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sentencing is very important and usually the last stage of the criminal process. The purpose of sentencing is to punish the criminals while at the same time stopping crime from continuing. The five philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and restoration. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. Deterrence is the strategy of preventing crime through the threat of punishment. It assumes that potential criminals will weigh the costs of punishments versus the benefits of the criminal act so then the punishments will more then likely be more severe. Incapacitation is a strategy for preventing crime by detaining wrongdoers in prison, separating them from the community and reducing criminal opportunities. Then there is rehabilitation, which is the philosophy that society is best served when wrongdoers are not simply punished, but provided the resources needed to eliminate criminality from their behavioral patterns. Restoration is a sentencing goal that seeks to address the damage by making the community and the victim “whole again”.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays