Preview

Explain the word 'Natural' in Natural Moral Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the word 'Natural' in Natural Moral Law
Explain the use of the word ‘Natural’ in Natural Moral Law
(25)

In society today, we define Nature as something that is not made by humankind but rather is instinctual. St Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) believed our telos can be discovered by using our human reason to reflect on our human nature and work out what we need to do in order to achieve our particular telos. And so Natural Moral Law is defined as the moral Law of God which has been built into us at creation by God.
Aquinas’s ideas of Natural moral Law stemmed from the ideas of Aristotle who believed that every object had a final cause and also believed that when an object’s purpose is fulfilled, it achieves supreme good which leads to eudemonia and is translated as eternal happiness. An example could be a chair. Its purpose is to be a chair and when it achieves this, it leaves a lasting impact of happiness on its host, but if it were to break, it would therefore cause unhappiness and possible pain. Aquinas saw that this theory of a final cause could apply to humans and so our knowledge of reason, given to us by God when we were created can be used in order to identify whether our actions are morally right or wrong. This idea can be divided into two kinds of ‘good’; Apparent good and Real good.
In this teleological idea, Aquinas thought humans can unknowingly do what is wrong by making a bad decision in practice, in order to better themselves and to help them decide what is really right. Apparent Good is what we believed is right but has a different outcome to what we expected and Real Good is the right moral action that agrees with the human ideal of what is intrinsically good. Aristotle said in Nichomachean Ethics: “Reason is the true self of everyman” which shows that reason is put is a part of human nature and helps us to decide our telos and why God that created us. In light of this quote it shows that reason is an intrinsic aspect of humans in order to work out our true self. When we act in our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Psc 110 Final Exam

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages

    h. Natural law – the idea that ethical principles are apparent in nature to all well-educated, reasonable men and so form the basis of human rights and good government.…

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Aquinas, St. T. 1265-1274, Summa Theologica. Publisher Not Applicable, reference is to general ideas, not a passage from a particular publication of the above…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas is a well-known philosopher and theologian of all time. In the Summa question 6, article 8 talks about whether ignorance is voluntary. Involuntariness is to act against one’s will. Also, ignorance is the lack of knowledge. Aquinas questions how voluntary ignorance can be; he spends most or all of the eighth article explaining this. Ignorance can occur when one does not realize their ignorance, but their efforts to obtain the knowledge are of no advantage to them. In article two, objection two claims that sins imply ignorance and ignorance causes involuntariness. This leads to the idea that that every sin is involuntary. The second objection claims that sin infers ignorance, which causes involuntariness.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EssayThief123

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However it can be argued that even before Aquinas developed Natural Law; it was a pretty stable concept which could be followed. As previously mentioned that we don’t truly know what good is, following our reason, as Aristotle said, would become much easier. This is because what we perceive to be good is personal to the individual and…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aquinas observed the universe and saw that everything in the universe was working towards a purpose for e.g. Tress growing leaves every spring and losing them every autumn. He noticed that they lacked intelligence, but there was regular pattern of leaves growing and dropping off at changes of seasons.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustine’s theodicy is mostly influenced by the creation stories found in the Genesis. Augustine had a traditional view of God and thought God was omnipotent and good. The genesis mentions that everything God made was good, therefore the universe that God created is good. Augustine believed there were higher and lower goods but everything was good in its own way.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Nature can be understood as counter to, or 'oppose'd to', miracles and if understood in that context then everything, except miracles themselves but including virtue and vice, would be considered natural. (T3.1.2.7)…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the assertion is made that God is everything, Aquinas explains his feelings on natural law, which is derived from eternal law. Aquinas believed natural law is the human conscience which is controlled by reason telling us what is right and wrong. However, Aquinas also believes that the supernatural world was of the highest importance to man and if a person is commanded by God, it is not a violation of natural law. He believed that there were three distinct types of law given to us by Him: divine/eternal law, natural law, and positive/human law. He felt that these laws should be obeyed in that…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    St Thomas Aquinas believed that the conscience was a device or faculty for distinguishing right from wrong through use of reason. He believed that it is a natural part of mental activity and provides an individual with moral guidance. He argued that there are two parts to making a moral decision; the Synderesis, this is the right reason, the awareness of being able to do good and prevent evil and the Conscienta, it distinguishes between right and wrong applies this…

    • 1426 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas’s view on the relationship between faith and reason is that they are overlapping. He says that man should use all things he can to learn about God. Aquinas states that there is general revelation and special revelation. General revelation is anything in the world, we use logic to see these. General revelation is reason. Special revelation can be seen through scripture and religion. Special revelation is faith. Aquinas believes that we should use any means we can to learn about God, so it is essential to use both general and special revelation. Through general revelation, he believes that we can use reason to give context to our faith. We can use reason to demonstrate some truths about faith, for example, the fact that God exists. Because you cannot understand everything from reason alone, there is some part of faith that can only be shown by special revelation. Aquinas believes that some things in faith that can be explained by reason and some ideas in reason that can be explained by faith and that is where the two overlap. On the other hand, there are other ideas that only faith can explain or only reason can explain. This is why he has an overlapping view on faith and reason because some ideas over lap and some do…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas Evil Vs Evil Essay

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, his assessment that evil is accidental and has no intrinsic cause only appears to work conceptually as opposed to actuality. In J.L Mackie’s piece “The Subjectivity of Values” he makes the claim that there are no objective values. (Mackie 181) Mackie’s approach prefers subjectivity insofar as it relates to judgements and standards that one uses every day and in various situations. Mackie describes the subjectivity as “This action is right means I approve of this action” (Mackie 182), it can also be interpreted as I believe this action is morally right or wrong or “moral judgements are equivalent to reports of the speaker’s own feelings or attitudes.” (Mackie 182) In evaluating standards Mackie notes decisions made by judges or experts in certain fields about a variety of topics all of which have a subjective guideline detailing what is exceptional and what is subpar. Mackie however does argue that standards do bare relations to the work that is in question but standards are not concrete as a(n) (objective) rule would be. Mackie then argues similarly to Rachels, who will be introduced later, that moral values do not rely upon desires and this can work in Aquinas’s favor however, the argument as a whole does…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Natural law philosophy is a system in place for the right of all humans. “The natural law theory is a theory of ethics that holds that there are moral laws found in nature and discernable by the use of reason” (MacKinnon 2015). This theory law theory identifies the actions of humans and categorized them either right or wrong. Virtue Ethics is often used to define characteristics standard of a person. Virtue Ethics normative theory that maintains that the focus of morality is habits, dispositions, and character traits” (MacKinnon 2015).…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays