Preview

Designated Smoking Areas Needed for College Campus Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1228 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Designated Smoking Areas Needed for College Campus Essay Example
College campus’s are in need of an area for those who smoke to do so in a safe environment. Right now the only place for us to go is the unsafe streets surrounding the campus. Although smokers choose an unsafe habit, it is their right to do so in a safe area. It is the college’s duty to provide this safe place.
It is estimated that 28.5 % of college students are smokers (uri.edu). There has been an increase in colleges and other corporations to have smoking bans, it is their belief that faculty and students will quit smoking. The main cause of doing away with smoking on campus is also to provide a place where second hand smoke is not an issue for those who choose not to light up. I agree that those who choose not to smoke should not be endangered by the actions of others. It is not fair to abolish smoking all together, there must be middle ground.The perfect solution is to construct a few sites on campus away from buildings and crowds for the smoking students. There is no evidence to show a decline in smoking after banning tobacco use. Tobacco use is a habit, not an easy thing to quit. If universities primary goal is to rid students of smoking then they are on the wrong path. More effect methods would be to provide smoking cessation products, counseling, and support groups. There is a way for a campus to be accepting of all professors and students.
The main concern is the safety of the students. If smokers are having to leave the safety of the campus to smoke they are put at a higher risk to be assaulted, raped, or robbed. Most smokers who live in dorms are going to leave their room for a smoke before going to bed. Putting a student on the street in a rough neighborhood late at night, sets themselves up to be a victim of a crime. A student should not have to choose between their right to smoke and their safety. Banning smoking on a college campus is asking them to do this. Safety should be the first priority for the staff and students. In the past 30 days there

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Engl 200 Unit 2 Analysis

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many campuses have issues between smokers and non-smokers; Kansas State University does not escape this. Many people on campus are bothered by smoking and smokers. This has led to a call for further smoking restrictions. In 2010 Joshua Madden wrote an editorial in the Kansas State Collegian against more restrictions on smokers. In the article, Madden argues that further restrictions against smokers are unnecessary since the effects of secondhand smoke outdoors are negligible, since smoking is a lifestyle choice similar to eating fatty foods K-State should not regulate it, and smoking is limited enough at K-State to add further limits. Further restrictions on smoking on campus are necessary because outdoor secondhand smoke is still very harmful, unlike eating fatty foods, smoking effects the health of others, and the places one can smoke on campus are not truly restricted or enforced. In my opinion, Kansas State should define smoking areas, and move them away from high traffic areas.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Earlier this year East Mississippi Community College (EMCC) adopted a tobacco-free campus policy. This prohibits the use of all tobacco products anywhere on the campus. There have been ashtrays outside since the college was established in 1927 that was removed earlier this year when the policy went into effect. This new policy applies to students and staff, as well as any visitors on campus. ("EMCC Adopts Tobacco-Free Campus Policy") A tobacco-free campus is better because it is healthier, accessible, and more aesthetically pleasing. ("Core…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How often do you see cigarette buds on the streets or on the side walks as you walk or drive by? Doesn't it make the environment look trashy? I believe it is a good idea for Central Texas College to remain a smoke-free campus. If there is no smoking allowed on the campus, the campus would look much cleaner and smell cleaner. I think it should be smoke free because it will not only make the campus look clean, it will also not distract students that don't like the smell. For some reasons like students would have to walk as far as off campus to go on a "smoke break" would take them forever to come back to class and not be able to stay focused because they may be addicted and need that cigarette to concentrate.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ctc Banning Cigarettes

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We have all been to places that allow smoking outside the doors, It is a horrible experience. You walk out the doors and are greeted by a big smelly puff of stinky smoke, and dirty ashtrays with lit cigarettes smoldering in them. Not very pleasant, this is why I feel that CTC should remain a smoke free campus. Smoking is dirty, is a potential fire danger, and the second hand smoke causes health risks.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerianpaper

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One could find a person smoking anywhere outside the buildings throughout college. This is one of the most mentioned topics when students and professors discuss about this new policy. It was something that went on very frequently. Many students, faculty, and visitors were passively smoking involuntarily for the mere reason that many others were smoking. In the other hand, we have the people who smoked, and were used to do it on campus for so long. This was a big and crucial change that they will have to adopt as a rule on campus.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currie, D. (2011, February 8). Study finds city-wide smoking ban reduces risks of preteen birth. _The Nations Health_, 40, 10.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking has been a public health threat for many years, so the main policy objective of the Smoke-free Air Act is the protection and security of all individuals in New York City. The 2002 legislation was passed to ensure that all workers have a safe, smoke free workplace environment, and that all nonsmokers can breathe smoke-free air in public places. The law is an important part of New York City’s effort to eliminate tobacco use as it is one of the most significant public health threats.The Act is excepted to reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses which account nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the United States (U.S. Department, 2004).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    every eight smoker's tobacco kills, one non-smoker is also killed by second hand smoke.´(American Lung Association) With a fact like that, it makes one really think about where they have been and how much smoke they have been subjected to. For me, attending college every day and walking through clouds of smoke to get from class to class really begins to put my health into perspective. Should a public place such as a college campus receive more rights than a facility such as a restaurant, department or grocery store? With an individuals health rights, the cleanliness around campus, and overall irritation of some of the students at risk, I believe college campus' should become America's new target against smoking and become smoke free…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a student is found smoking anywhere else, there should be some sort of penalty or punishment to them, including the understanding of how this is negatively affecting their lives. It should be something to scare the smoker, enough to shake that person a little bit. That person should have to do community service around campus by cleaning up cigarette butts to make the campus look cleaner. Also, a series of The Real Cost commercials can be shown. On the other hand, the approach can be taken of raising awareness instead of penalizing the smokers. Yes, there would be a fight if the campus started actually enforcing the rules, but isn’t that what rules are meant to do – stop people from doing an unwanted action? It is common knowledge that smoking cigarettes leads to lung cancer, so, why not raise awareness of lung cancer attracting those who…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outdoor public smoking on the National Mall should be banned because it is risky for nonsmokers and the cigarette butts cause a litter problem. When people smoke in public, not only do they risk their own health, they risk the health of the general public. One could argue that smokers should have a designated smoking area on the National Mall, but according to the World Health Organization, there are no safe levels of second-hand smoke whether it is indoors or outdoors. Toxins that our lungs are exposed to on a consistent basis, which is caused by secondhand smoke, can be dangerous to our health. Chemicals such as benzene and arsenic are inhaled from second-hand smoking and can cause cancer. The National Mall is one of the largest tourist attractions in Washington, DC and it attracts millions of people, including families. If a child is not subjected to the toxins from cigarettes at home and in their daily lives, they should not be subjected when they are out of their homes. Even if children were not exposed, non-smokers in general should not be put at risk. Smoke in the air--even outdoors--can cause asthma attacks and bronchial infections, among other reactions.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Past research has shown that having smoke free campus has had positive results in the student smoking behavior. For example, Lee, Ranney, and Goldstein (2013) has found that when the policy of having a 100% smoke free campus actually decreased the amount of cigarette butt litter that was near entrances of buildings on campus rather than a campus that did not have such a policy. Furthermore, Seo, Macy, Torabi, and Middlestadt (2011) has also discovered that smoking norms of Purdue University students were beginning to change because of the smoke-free policy. It began to come less socially acceptable to smoke. Additionally, having a policy on smoking where you must be at least 20 feet away from entrances of buildings and no smoking indoors had…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some parents who are smokers and it is still their choice whether they choose to expose their children to it, not the choice of others. However, as a student visitor to the National Mall, not only is a choice not given to go on a field trip (because a grade may be pending an assignment that this trip completes) on which second hand smoke exposure could happen, but the impression that is left is long lasting. Ultimately, parents should be able to choose what they want to expose their children to. Banning public smoking on the National Mall would help parents control what they expose their impressionable children…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With these new advances people are now starting to come up with actions to help eliminate secondhand smoke. “The American College Health Association (ACHA) has recently adopted a No Tobacco Use policy that encourages colleges and universities to be diligent in their efforts to achieve a campus-wide smoke-free environment (Harbison 323). For an example on University of North Carolina Wilmington students, factuality, and guest have to follow guidelines put in place by the campus to help promote health and eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke. They do this by not allowing tobacco products use inside any UNCW building and they also do not allow tobacco product use within 25 feet of any building entrance. These small changes can have a greater…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays