Preview

Smoke-Free Air Act Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
481 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Smoke-Free Air Act Research Paper
Smoking has been a public health threat for many years, so the main policy objective of the Smoke-free Air Act is the protection and security of all individuals in New York City. The 2002 legislation was passed to ensure that all workers have a safe, smoke free workplace environment, and that all nonsmokers can breathe smoke-free air in public places. The law is an important part of New York City’s effort to eliminate tobacco use as it is one of the most significant public health threats.The Act is excepted to reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses which account nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the United States (U.S. Department, 2004). The Smoke-Free Air Act,trades off liberty for security. Smokers will now be unable to smoke were they wish. Essentially, property rights to restrict consumer choice hae been infridged upon and have been shifted from smokers to non- smokers, in the interests of health and security. Smokers are openly against this act because it violates their …show more content…
They argue the laws are appropriate to promote the health of the majority of citizens. According to author Rabin, “In 2006, New York City 's overall adult smoking rate didn 't change. But smoking decreased among men and Hispanics” (Rabin 54). This has shown that since the act was put into place it has positively changed the outlook of many indivuduals. Opponents of the Act include smokers,cigarette manufacturers, and business owners.The manufacturers point out that cigarettes fall under the category ‘sin’ goods, and are heavily taxed, accounting for a large share of Sumptuary tax revenues. Business owener’s worry that the ban leads to a negative affect to their business, which will decrease their reveneues. Also, smokers have felt that their rights have been infridged upon, now with limited access to places where they could have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this paper, we discussed the ethical implications of New York’s ban on smoking in public places. We looked at two considerations with this policy, Utilitarianism - greatest overall amount of good or happiness and deontology - rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves, not the consequences of those actions. We discussed several issues involved with Initiative…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The contentions against charging smokers higher protection rates engage contemplations of social equity and reasonableness. This practice may lead numerous individuals to forego wellbeing protection despite the fact that they may need to pay a fine under the ACA. Since smokers have a tendency to have fundamentally lower salaries than non-smokers, they could be particularly powerless against expanded wellbeing protection costs. In the event that smokers withdraw of wellbeing protection this could have an inconvenient effect on their right to gain entrance to medicinal services and contrarily affect their wellbeing and prosperity. Most protection arrangements spread smoking-suspension programs. It would be ironic–and tragic–if charging smoker 's higher wellbeing protection rates kept them from getting to administrations that could help them quit smoking. To stay away from this heartbreaking conclusion, rate builds ought to be kept low enough that they don 't lead smokers to forego wellbeing protection. Then again, if rates are excessively low they may not give a sufficient monetary motivating force to quit smoking.…

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From flappers to movie stars, cigarettes became an integral, flexible prop. Cigarettes are a familiar part of the American culture and have been for hundreds of years. Allan M. Brandt author of the book The Cigarette Century, states, “Cigarettes are the product that defined America.” Cigarettes became a popular modern commodity as consumer beliefs developed. The product intertwined and blossomed with the development of American business, advertisement, and consumerism in the modern age. As cigarette consumption skyrocketed, evidence that cigarette smoking, and second hand smoke was dangerous was yet to emerge. Knowledge of the health effects has since had a complex effect on the public and the industry. American policy, industry strategy, and lawsuits concerning cigarettes have all provided windows into governments, industry, and public confrontation with risk, freedom, responsibility, and blame over the course of the last hundred years. Thus is why all Americans have a bias towards cigarette smoke, tobacco companies and products, and because of this, the product oftentimes has an ethical position-somewhat contradictory, as being both a leading cause of cancer and as an appealing product to some.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people debate over where government intervention is appropriate and personal freedom should begin. One of these highly discussed topics is banning smoking in public places. The ban of smoking in public has many advantages and reasons. Smoking in public puts innocent adults, teenagers, and children at risk of serious health problems. If smoking is banned in public, this may help lower rates of potential smokers and current smokers as well. The welfare of the nonsmoker and the smoker are both affected by allowing smoking in public. By banning smoking in these areas, the population would be positively influenced.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being exposed to second hand smoke from burning tobacco products causes disease and early death among nonsmokers. Public policies help to make and enforce new laws that are beneficial to the public, for instance, smoke free laws that prohibit smoking in public places like bars and restaurants to help improve the health of workers and the general population, there for saving lives by sparing non-smokers from breathing in the second-hand smoke. Smoking does not just harm the smoker it also harms people nearby, who breathe in the smoke. Tobacco smoke can cause cancer, strokes and heart disease and public policies makes us aware, cigarette smokers and tobacco companies in check.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tobacco has been a cash crop in America since the first colonists settled here. In fact, many historians have said America would not exist as we know it without the original routes of tobacco here. While there are significant health risks with tobacco, it is an essential part of the American economy. In 2011, the huge sum of 17,653,708,000 dollars were collected in revenue from taxation on cigarettes (Tobacco Tax Revenue). Apart from this immediate benefit of the taxes, it also dissuades people, particularly youth, to smoke. “Every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces consumption by about 4 percent among adults and about 7 percent among youth”…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How often do you see cigarette buds on the streets or on the side walks as you walk or drive by? Doesn't it make the environment look trashy? I believe it is a good idea for Central Texas College to remain a smoke-free campus. If there is no smoking allowed on the campus, the campus would look much cleaner and smell cleaner. I think it should be smoke free because it will not only make the campus look clean, it will also not distract students that don't like the smell. For some reasons like students would have to walk as far as off campus to go on a "smoke break" would take them forever to come back to class and not be able to stay focused because they may be addicted and need that cigarette to concentrate.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The name of this article is “Proposal for nationwide smoking ban gives some a bad taste.” This article was written by Associated Press, but was adapted by the Newsela Staff. It was published on November 20, 2015. Since this was a group effort there are no specific author credentials. The author’s intended audience is people who believe smoking in public places shouldn’t be allowed.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cigarette Taxes

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The interest in cigarette taxes and their effects have been a hot topic in relation to the economy for the past 20 years. People question whether or not increased taxes really affect the demand. Do the taxes cause effects other than a change in demand? Who does this ultimately effect, the rich or poor? Where does the money go? So why does the government decide to impose higher cigarette taxes? They do this for two main reasons. One reason is to reduce the number or smokers. The second reason is to increase government revenue. The biggest problem with this though it that studies have found that raising taxes does decrease users therefore decreases the amount of revenue coming in.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vice President of Philip Morris Companies Inc. Stanley S. Scott, in his essay “Smokers Get A Raw Deal”, addresses the growing discrimination against smokers. Scott states that recently people who smoke are forced to, “… put up with virtually unenforceable laws regulating when and where they can smoke…” instead of, “… using common courtesy and common sense.” which is unjust and unfair (Scott 3). He supports his claim by giving several examples of times when smokers have been attacked in public by random citizens, like in New York, in a Seattle drugstore, on a Los Angeles bus, and in the Bronx (Scott 5). He also uses an allusion when he mentions the segregation of African Americans (Scott 1). Scott finally creates a false dilemma when he says, “ the basic freedoms of at least 50 million American smokers are at risk today,” he prompts American citizens to ask themselves if discrimination of any sort is okay? Scott adopts a professional and passionate tone for his audience, the readers of the New York Times, non-smokers, and in essence the nation.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are smoking bans against smoking in public places really that necessary to protect non-smokers from the harmful chemicals of second hand smoke? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! However, another question that should be asked is: Do smoking bans infringe upon the rights of your freedom to smoke if you choose to smoke in places other than your personal residence or automobile? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! Therefore, the real question that must be asked is: Are smoking bans becoming too restrictive? Comment by SVSU: Quite a few questions here. Why not simply state these things?…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Welfare and Cigarettes

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the increased health problems that caused by smoking, more and more people think that the production and sale of cigarettes should be made illegal. However, these people tend to ignore that the positive outcome of cigarettes business brings to the society. They also falsely believe that prohibition of producing and selling cigarettes will lead people to adopt a healthier living environment.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In “I’d Rather Smoke Than Kiss,” Florence King states that no matter what American society thinks, says or does, it will not convince her to quit smoking. King 's choice of words suggests that the government purposely tries to segregate all smokers from non-smokers, by making signs or segregating areas for smokers to go. She implies that all non-smokers are against smokers and will do anything in their power to stop them by passing laws. A lot of cigarette companies tell people that if they stop smoking, it will put a strain on the economy, “Strategies”. King 's article is important because her arguments exemplify different observational situations, which society imposes on smokers in the United States and offers knowledge about some of the issues of discrimination towards smokers by combining personal experience and actual situations that smokers encounter everyday in life.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three parties are hurt when the government decrees that no eating establishment can allow smoking. First, it negatively affects the right of the tobacco users who wants to smoke at their favorite spot. Next it takes away the freedom of business owners to choose how they will conduct business and how they will meet the interest of their customers. Third, it affects nonsmokers as occurred in Las Vegas Nevada where smoking was outlawed but it failed to have the desired effect of halting smoking. Owners of eating establishments were forced to stop providing a separate smoking area; in practice the business owners didn’t chase out customers who smoked in the place of business. It was a challenge to enforce and it…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Community Assessment

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Healthy People 2020 “heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States… Fortunately, it is also among the most preventable.” Cigarette smoking is a major cause of heart disease, this fact is very important to the residents of the Upper West side because although 49% of smokers attempted to quit last year. One fifth of adults still smoke which is 20% of the population. While still lower than New York City’s average of 22%, cigarette smoking and the effects should be an area of concern for the Upper West…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics