Preview

A Hypothetical Conversation Between Karl Marx, Peter Singer, and Jurgen Habermas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1594 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Hypothetical Conversation Between Karl Marx, Peter Singer, and Jurgen Habermas
Karl Marx would have agreed with Peter Singer’s evaluation that globalization brought on by changes and advancements in technology have changed the conversation in regard to the role of the nation-state, but he would have disagreed with Singer’s call for the rich nations to, in effect, police themselves and altruistically manifest a global ethical viewpoint. Instead, Marx would have argued for a more violent overthrow of the existing social super-structure. Furthermore, Marx would have contended that globalization and the creation of a global economy founded upon capitalism without the overthrow of the existing bourgeois would just further the interests of the ruling class. Marx would also have agreed with Jurgen Habermas’ view that improving the living conditions of all as a means to change the super-structure and that unfettered capitalism leads to the deleterious stratification of world society, but, again, would have disagreed as to the effectiveness of the essentially peaceful communicative action in the public sphere, posited by Habermas, as a means to eliminate the division within society. In all likelihood, Marx would probably be more inclined to see the merits of violent terrorism campaigns of shock and awe as opposed to a self-imposed Western revision of self-image. While these three theorists have their dissimilarities there is a common thread to their argument—globalization can be a tremendous force for peaceful global unity, but only if the focus is on the improvement of the standard of living, not merely to advance the interests of the few. Furthermore, globalization in its current state continues to uphold the existing power structure, and it is morally imperative to readdress traditional notions in regard to globalization.
Karl Marx not only argued that capitalism results in the dehumanizing stratification of the vast majority of the populace, but he also argued for a radical reevaluation of traditional ideas. Marx recognized that capitalism is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many theorists, by contrast, have argued that one of the trends of globalization is depoliticization of publics, the decline of the nation-state, and end of traditional politics (Boggs 2000). While I would agree that globalization is promoted by tremendously powerful economic forces and that it often undermines democratic movements and decisionmaking, I would also argue that there are openings and possibilities for a globalization from below, and that globalization can thus help promote as well as undermine democracy.11 As noted, however, globalization from below can implement and inflect globalization both for positive and progressive ends like democracy and social justice, as well as destructive ones like terrorism. In general, globalization involves both a disorganization and reorganization of capitalism, a tremendous restructuring process, which creates openings for progressive social change and intervention. In a more fluid and open economic and political system, oppositional forces can gain concessions, win victories, and effect progressive changes. During the 1970s, new social movements, new non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and new forms of struggle and solidarity emerged that have been expanding to the present day (Hardt and Negri 2000; Burbach 2001; and Foran 2003). And, as noted, destructive forces are also unleashed like terrorism and the sorts of civil war apparent in Africa and other parts of the developing world. The present conjuncture, I would suggest, is marked by a conflict between growing centralization and organization of power and wealth in the hands of the few contrasted with opposing processes exhibiting a fragmentation of power that is more plural, multiple, and open to contestation. As the following analysis will suggest, both tendencies are observable and…

    • 16051 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx, the author proclaims that the struggles of the poor are caused by the greedy rich members of society taking advantage of the lower class. At the time, there were many workers who were exploited by their employers due to the complete lack of labor laws. Marx’s knowledge of his audience helped him to create an argument that appealed to abused workers; and slowly eased them into his revolutionary ideas for overthrowing the upper class.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx was regarded as the father of communism. He criticized the dominant form of government during his time which was capitalism. Capitalism encourages competition among the people and gives rewards unequally. He argued that capitalist nations allowed the few wealthy people to amass a great fortune while the masses seemed to work harder with little reward for their efforts (Ebrey et. al., 2005). The rich kept the resources for themselves, often denying the poor of an equal opportunity.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They compare the bourgeoisie to a sorcerer who has lost his grip on the powers he once commanded, unable to control the consequences of his actions. It gives the impression of an unstable class system tenuously clinging to a doomed economic market, which seems to imply that there was a true sense of hope of toppling the social hierarchy. To a modern reader, Marx seems either incredibly hopeful or somewhat naive to underestimate the impact of capitalism on the world. His reliance on the inevitability of socialism indicates that the true implications of capitalism were not yet clear during his time, or perhaps shows the strength of the people’s desperation political, social, and economic equality. The Communist dream of a highly centralized community free of social hierarchy or private property emerged directly as a result from the divisive class system of the time period.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, he believes that after the fall of the Soviet Union the profit-driven globalization-from-above arose as the only legitimate path to economic growth. He argues that citizens – and even governments – feel helpless in an economic climate “where the market reign[s] by divine right”2. While this methodology has arguably increased living standards around the world, it has also encouraged those in power to focus almost entirely on the interests of business and finance. In the process, either by choice or necessity they disregard important social concerns such as wealth inequality, falling labor standards, environmental harm and faltering support for free trade. The second factor encouraging “predatory globalization” is that global organizations such as the UN have very narrow missions that are almost purely concerned with the enlargement of the Security Council.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx not only saw capitalism as a crime, but also believed that it caused more crime. He believed that capitalism was based on exploiting and oppressing the majority. He believed that capitalism made way for the rates of violence and corruption to be able to grow to the point where it all became a dog eat dog type of system. He believed that crime was a result of the existence of poverty and inequality.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke And Communism

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Karl Marx played a major role in capitalism as we know it. He presented capitalism in a way that was beneficial for everyone including the states. He also encourage human rights and democracy. He encouraged privately owned property and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They thought that as the working classes grew more aware of the exploitation that they suffered from the upper classes they would rise up and as feudalism was replaced by capitalism, that communism would replace capitalism. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels also argued that capitalism is associated with the unfair distribution of wealth and power; a tendency toward market monopoly.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Karl Marx claimed that capitalism places economic production under the ownership of capitalists, who…

    • 3521 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Was Right

    • 678 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capitalism has been the subject of criticism from many perspectives during its history. Criticisms range from people who disagree with the principles of capitalism in its entirety, to those who disagree with particular outcomes of capitalism. Among those wishing to replace capitalism with a different method of production and social organization, a distinction can be made between those believing that capitalism can only be overcome with revolution (e.g., revolutionary socialism) and those believing that structural change can come slowly through political reforms to capitalism (e.g., classic social democracy).Karl Marx saw capitalism as a progressive historical stage that would eventually stagnate due to internal contradictions and be followed by…

    • 678 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by David Prychitko, the author described Karl Marx’s interpretations of capitalism as one of the most debated views in history. “More than a century after his death, Karl Marx remains one of the most controversial figures in the Western world. His relentless criticism of capitalism and his corresponding promise of an inevitable, harmonious socialist future inspired a revolution of global proportions.” Before its ultimate demise at the end of the twentieth century, the Marxism ideology had a heavy foothold through Eastern Europe. (Prychitko, 2008)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx has been regarded as the champion of communism and an advocate of “classless society.” Marxism is often known as a “philosophy of social revolution.” Marx never aspired for a…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays