Preview

Zippittelli V Jc Penny

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zippittelli V Jc Penny
Zippittelli v. J.C. Penney Co.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

February 28, 2007

JOANNE ZIPPITTELLI, PLAINTIFF
v.
J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., J.C. PENNEY TELEMARKETING, INC., AND JAMES JOHNSON, DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge James M. Munley United States District Court
MEMORANDUM
Before the court is defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18). Having been fully briefed and argued, the matter is ripe for disposition.
I. Background
The plaintiff, who is 66 years old, brought this employment discrimination suit against her employer, J.C. Penney, after the company failed to promote her to the position of shift operations manager at the company's Moosic, Pennsylvania Customer Service Center. (See Complaint (Doc. 1)). She alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., retaliation claims under both acts, and the same claims under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. She brought these claims against both the company and the PHRA claims against her supervisor at the Moosic center, James Johnson.
Plaintiff sought relief in the form of appointment to the position she was denied, back pay, costs and attorney's fees, front pay, and punitive and liquidated damages.
Plaintiff was hired by J.C. Penney on July 18, 1988. (Defendant's Statement of Material Facts (hereinafter "Defendant's Statement of Facts") (Doc. 19) at ¶ 1)*fn1 .
She was the first associate hired at the new Customer Service Center in Moosic. James Johnson became personnel manager at the facility in March 1990. (Defendant's Statement of Facts at ¶ 5). Johnson was promoted to manager of the call center in March 1999 (Id. at ¶).*fn2 After Johnson came to the facility, plaintiff frequently sought promotion to a management position. In 1990, she sought promotion to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Weintraub Genshlea & Sproul, Rosemary Kelley, Charles L. Post, and William S. Jue, for Plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant, in turn, has filed a countersuit against The Company on the grounds of wrongful termination. Information about the termination was given to The Defendant after she reported that she would be requiring additional time off due to high-risk factors related to her…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (AEFA), Bonnie Wittenburg was an employee for AEFA in their Minneapolis office. The plaintiff was hired by the company in November of 1998 at the age of forty-six to serve as an Equity Research Analyst in AEFA's Equity Investment Department. During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a movant has the burden to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact remains to be litigated, that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that it appears from the evidence, when viewed most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the non-moving party.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, Pat Employee, submits the following Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crown Awards is a retailer of awards and trophies sold through mail order catalogs and via the Internet. Crown designed and sold a diamond-shaped spinning trophy for which it owned two copyright registrations. Discount Trophy is one of Crown’s competitors, and it sold a trophy that was substantially similar to Crown’s Spin Trophy. Crown requested that Discount discontinue the sale of the alleged copy, and when Discount refused, Crown filed suit in the Southern District of New York.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marge's Lawsuit Case

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    This case has quite a few legal issues, however we will need furthermore information to determine if Marge can sue Bert. The legal issues of this case has indications of age discrimination, which Bert denies Marge the position because they believe she will retire because of her age being 58 and the position requires 5 years of training. However, another legal issue that can be found in this case is disparate treatment age discrimination and primia facie, and in order for it to be proven it must fall under these four conditions. The first condition is the individual must be 40 years old or older, in this case Marge fits this category. The second condition must show that the outcome of the employers decision affect them, in this case she was…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Case

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was a case brought to action by Joanne Zippittelli against her employer, J.C. Penney Company. Her defense for creating case was that she was overlooked for the position in question due to her age. Zippittelli was one of four women who applied for the position with the company. All four women had the same job title and when they were interviewed by the Personnel Manager, he determined that there were three candidates including the plaintiff qualified for the position. Johnson then ranked the applicants, making the plaintiff his third choice (Twomey, pg. 537). After a consultation with Johnson’s supervisor, he hired his first choice, Patti Cruikshank. Zippittelli had a conversation with her supervisor, Anita Benko about how she was overlooked. Benko asked Zippittelli how old she was at which time Zippittelli responded she was 63. Benko made the statement that she would “probably not” get the position. After having this conversation with her supervisor Zippittelli was convinced her age was to blame for her lack of success within the company. Zippittelli filed a complaint with the EEOC and received a right-to-sue letter. The Age discrimination in Employment Act prohibits discrimination against any individual over the age of 40 with respect to “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s age (Twomey, pg. 538).…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The reason behind can be result-oriented system, where technique and pace of final product matter a lot. A believe that young employees make conducive atmosphere for work, on the contrary older employees have been in company for a long time, making them more loyal, that their younger counterpart. With the improving the health care, allowing people to live longer and healthier, in 1967 to prohibit age related discrimination ADEA (Age Discrimination in Employment Act) was enacted. It protected all the employees above the age of 40, against discriminatory behaviour on hiring or firing by employer, unions or any commercial organization, which adversely affect the employee although he is qualified for the position. ADEA has a narrow scope in comparison to Title VII as latter is a pure form of discrimination, where if not proved by employee, employer based on RFOA (reasonable factor other than age). Smith v. Jackson city employer practice of Wage hikes for the employees with 5 or less years in department was justified as encouragement for potential employees and shows no disparate impact on the old…

    • 5250 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. The court that heard the case in the attached file was Kevin M.V. Whitaker, of the Superior court of Justice, date March 23 2011, with reasons reported at 2011 ONSC 1475, 333 D.L.R (4TH) 566.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wherefore Plaintiff demands court costs expended, trial by jury and all other relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts, 17 (California 4th 670 March 2, 1998).…

    • 3283 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics