Justin King Answer
IN AND FOR FORD COUNTY, ILLINOIS
PAXTON MEDICAL CENTER AND ITS DOCTORS, SURGEONS AND NURSES
Defendant VS.
JUSTIN WILLIAM KING
Plaintiff )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 7417410 (05)
Judge Stephen R. Pacey
DEFENDANT ANSWER
TO
PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, DEFENDANT, Paxon Hospital and for their complaint alleges as follows:
1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of
Jackson, State of Missouri. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants,
Answer to Paragraph 1, Defendants admits that plaintiff, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri and denies the rest of the paragraph.
2. The cause of action took place in Ford County, Illinois.
Answer to Paragraph 2. Defendants do not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, deny each and every allegation contained therein. 3. This is an action for damages in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits
of this court.
Answer to paragraph 3. Defendants deny allegations that’s this court has proper jurisdiction to hear diversity cases as cited by Article III, §2 of the United States Constitution. The proper United States District is Northern District of Illinois.
4. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants,
Paxton Medical Center and medical staff including doctors, surgeons, and nurses was and is located in the County of Ford, State of Illinois.
Answer to paragraph 4, Defendant agrees to allegation.
5. The cause of action took place in Ford County, Illinois.
Answer to Paragraph 5, Defendants does not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, denies each and every allegation contained therein.
6. This is an action for damages in excess of the minimal
PAXTON MEDICAL CENTER AND ITS DOCTORS, SURGEONS AND NURSES
Defendant VS.
JUSTIN WILLIAM KING
Plaintiff )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 7417410 (05)
Judge Stephen R. Pacey
DEFENDANT ANSWER
TO
PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, DEFENDANT, Paxon Hospital and for their complaint alleges as follows:
1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of
Jackson, State of Missouri. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants,
Answer to Paragraph 1, Defendants admits that plaintiff, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri and denies the rest of the paragraph.
2. The cause of action took place in Ford County, Illinois.
Answer to Paragraph 2. Defendants do not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, deny each and every allegation contained therein. 3. This is an action for damages in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits
of this court.
Answer to paragraph 3. Defendants deny allegations that’s this court has proper jurisdiction to hear diversity cases as cited by Article III, §2 of the United States Constitution. The proper United States District is Northern District of Illinois.
4. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants,
Paxton Medical Center and medical staff including doctors, surgeons, and nurses was and is located in the County of Ford, State of Illinois.
Answer to paragraph 4, Defendant agrees to allegation.
5. The cause of action took place in Ford County, Illinois.
Answer to Paragraph 5, Defendants does not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, denies each and every allegation contained therein.
6. This is an action for damages in excess of the minimal