Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Youth Justice

Powerful Essays
2443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Youth Justice
The youth justice system focuses mainly on punishing children and young people and fails to promote their welfare’- Discuss this view, giving arguments for and against, and referring to the relevant legislation and course materials.
.

In this assignment I will concentrate on the youth justice system, citing The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (CDA), The Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentences) Act 2000, The Children and Young Person Act 1969 and The Children Act 1989.

The Criminal Justice system comprises a number of agencies and structures that cover investigation of crime, probation services, social services, the prosecution of defendants, the sentencing of offenders, and the administration and enforcement of sentences.

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 does not change section 6(1) of the CJA 1991, which provides that a court shall not pass a community sentence unless it is of the opinion that the offence or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it was serious enough to warrant such a sentence. (Workbook 3, p.31)

To some extent the young justice system recognises the vulnerability of the child or young person during the progress through the criminal justice system. This however has been reduced by implementation of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. This means that the past requirement that the prosecution of a child (under 14yrs old) involved their understanding of their crime is no long required. The child’s right to remain silent was also abolished by the CDA 1998. The prosecution now only has to prove that the child committed the crime as charged.

The CDA 1998 also introduced a number of civil orders to control sub-criminal anti-social behaviour and replaced cautions with reprimands and warnings. Furthermore, Schedule 2 of the Children Act 1989 requires a reduction of criminal proceedings against children and young people. The local authority also has a duty to take reasonable steps to avoid the need for children within their area to be placed in secure accommodation.

The Youth Offending Team (YOT) set up by CDA has a preventive role encouraging children and young not to engage in crime. It is the statutory aim of the youth justice system to prevent offending and re-offending. The CDA also specifies that a YOT must include at least one social worker, a probation officer, a person nominated by the local health authority and one person nominated by the local authority education. The local authority has a wide range of responsibilities and powers in preventing and combating youth crime. Anne Worrall and Anna Souhami in the Reader say that the CDA 1998 creates new opportunities for social work intervention to prevent and support the principles of restorative justice; this is largely achieved through and is the responsibility -2-

of YOT’s. Multi-agency work is central to working with children who commit crimes or are engaging in delinquent disorderly behaviour.

According to the Children and Young Person Act 1933 (amended 1969) youth justice courts were required to give a paramount regard to the welfare of the child or young person appearing before them. Acting in their best interests however often resulted in removal of the child from the family to an institution. A policy of ‘bifurcation’ (1980’s) has therefore ensured that the majority of less serious offenders were dealt with in the community with the support of the juvenile justice workers A theory was developed that young people need to grow out of crime and should be supported within their own communities encouraging their senses of ‘belonging’ and developing their skills and problem solving choices. Holman (1995) cited in workbook 3 refers to ‘resourceful friends’ who can bring concern, stability, integrity and certain skills to help young people (Workbook 3, p.42).

Recently however we have returned to early and maximum intervention involving secure training centres and young offender institutions for children as young as ten and formal supervision orders for children even younger. Children who have committed immoral acts of ‘pure evil’, for example those responsible for the murder of Jamie Bulger in 1993, came to symbolise a perceived increase in crime by very young children and a growing public belief that children who commit ‘adult crimes should be treated as adults’ (Reader chapter 13, p124).

The case study of a gang of children on the Greytrees estate aged between nine and fifteen shows their behaviour includes being very noisy, staying out late in the evening, joyriding, vandalism and abusive behaviour. This resulted in other residents contacting the police regarding their behaviour (Workshop 3, pg 41). Although children aged under ten cannot be charged with a criminal offence; nor can they be the subject of an application for an Anti Social Behaviour Order (“ASBO”) under the CDA 1998. Although under S11 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and S60 of the Children Act 2004, the local authority can apply for a child safety order (CSO) in the Family Proceedings Court. The effect of such an order is that the child is placed under the supervision of a ‘responsible officer.

The police contact the local YOT as an appropriate adult must be called. The questioning must not begin without an appropriate adult being present, in the case study provided from the YOT. The role of the appropriate adult at the police station is to advise, assist and protect the rights and welfare of the children while being interviewed. It is the duty of the appropriate adult to observe and intervene when necessary.

There are often tensions between the criminal justice system, specifically the police. The police criticise the working practices of the YOT and the YOT consider the police are too reliant on inflexible procedures. It is often the case that after interviewing a child the police decide there is not enough evidence to issue charges. The child could be issued -3-

with either a police reprimand or a final warning or given that it is an ongoing and worsening issue, the police will apply to the criminal court for a possible Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) as provided by CDA 1998 S.1. If the children breaches the terms of the ASBO they can be fined or imprisoned. The police would then need to consider whether to release on bail or to detain until a court appearance.

An ASBO normally runs alongside a Parenting Order as provided by CDA 1998 S8. A Parenting Order has a minimum duration of two years. This requires the parents to comply with the terms of the order and to engage in counselling and guidance sessions. A responsible officer, usually from the YOT would be involved. Parents breaching the terms of the PO will be liable to a fine.

It is the YOT who would arrange for these young people to participate in some sort of rehabilitation program. The YOT would first assess the young people in order to ascertain whether the rehabilitation programme is suitable for them and would then identify the key elements to be addressed. CDA 1998 S38 requires local authorities to provide youth justice in their area. Each YOT is responsible for co-ordinating the provision of youth justice services in its local area (Workshop 3, p 46).

The Government believes that early intervention is vital to prevent frequent anti social behaviour and repeat offending. The National Standards for Young Justice require all youth justice agencies to take steps to encourage anti-discriminatory practice. When working with young people the professionals are to promote their understanding of different cultures and to combat racially motivated offending. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 S38 provides that where a young person aged ten to sixteen is charged with an offence the custody officer should order their release unless the person has been arrested for an impressionable offence and their detention is necessary to prevent further offending (Workbook 3, p 54).

The child’s family would be fully supported throughout the course of the court proceedings by the YOT. Vernon Stewart explained that family should have an understanding by describing to them the physical structure of the court and who is going to be present and what their respective roles are. Social Workers today are expected to have a good understanding of how the law impacts upon practice and verify that judgements pronounced by the courts comply with all relevant laws and case law precedents. The social worker is also responsible for the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) or Specific Sentence Report (SSR) which supports more informed decision making in the determination of sentences. In the case of “the trouble with children” the Criminal Justice Act 1991 S3 (1) requires that the PSR is obtained and considered in the court before a custodial sentence is imposed.

The social worker from the YOT attends court to promote the welfare of the young people and to ensure the magistrates act in the young people’s best interest while at the same time, somewhat contradictorily, passing sentence. The YOT will provides crucial -3-

information about the offender’s circumstances and often even presents realistic proposals considering the statutory aim of the young justice system as set out in CDA 1998 S37. The report must follow the National Standards as well as the welfare principle as provided by the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 S44.

If a young person is convicted the sentences available to the court include supervision orders, action plan orders and detention and training orders. In this case study the court would be most likely consider an Action Plan Order (PCC (S) A s.69) to be most suitable due to its flexibility. It allows for more intensive and focused intervention with the young people. The offender is placed under the supervision of the responsible officer, usually the Police Officer connected to the YOT. After making an APO a court can fix a further hearing within 21 days to obtain a report of the effectiveness of the order (CDA 1998 s.69).

The White Paper (Home Office 1997) suggested a radical reform of the function and organisation of the youth court; the purpose of the youth court must change from simply deciding guilt or innocence and then issuing sentences. In most cases, the offence should trigger a wider enquiry into the circumstances and nature of the offending behaviour.

The local authority could apply to the Family Proceedings Court with the view of obtaining a Child Safety Order (CSO). The CSO is a preventative order designed to intervene swiftly and briefly with children under the age of ten to ‘nip the offending in the bud’ at the earliest opportunity (The Reader, Chapter 30, p245). It is designed for children under the age of ten who appear to be unsupervised or are causing a nuisance.

The local authority can also issue a notice imposing a curfew on the young person for a maximum of 90 days. This is a provision of the Local Child Curfew Scheme (LCCS) introduced by CDA 1998. Its aim is to prevent children being involved in anti-social or potentially criminal behaviour. This would ban young people from being in a public place at certain hours without responsible adult.

The curfew is enforced by the police, a breach will result in the local authority visiting the young person’s home and probably issuing an appropriate CSO. In addition to this the PO would also apply under the supervision of the social worker. If the parents are found to be unable to care or supervise their children the social worker would than need to consider further options, for example other relatives/guardians to take on parental responsibilities for the children.

It is a local authority’s specific duty to provide supporting facilities with benefits advice, counselling and guidance usually through Family Centres {Children Act 1989 Schedule 2, paragraph 8} and also a broad range of services provided by different agencies for those who care for children. The local authority also has a duty towards the children and young people in their area to publish information about their services and to take

-4-

reasonable steps to ensure that those who might benefit from services receive the information relevant to them.

It is the responsibilities of the social worker (YOT and Children’s Trust) to visit the family and work together in the partnership with them with regard to the welfare of the children. If families are excluded from the decision making processes affecting them there is likely to be issues regarding their commitment to the planning process undertaken by professionals. Social workers should always remember that separating children and young people from their family should be the last option.

The Children Act 1989 supports the principle that children should live with their parents and that the primary responsibility for their welfare and upbringing remains with the parents. In order for certain parents to provide a safe and supportive family environment it will be necessary for the social worker to promote an inner partnership within the members of the family.

The ongoing search for a more effective response to crime has continued for centuries. The actions of children will often have their roots within their family, although social workers working in partnership with families can help reduce repeat cycles of behaviour.

We are gradually moving towards an increase in formal intervention in the lives of children, although society will likely continue searching for the “right” way to bring up children. It is our duty to provide a safe environment and present a good example to our children who are the next generation.

The purpose of any justice system is, through sentencing, to punish the offender and obtain retribution for his crime for society. Sentencing also has its aim to rehabilitate the offender. Sentencing therefore has a number of aims which can appear paradoxical and to create tensions with each other. These tensions are very evident in the youth justice system where rehabilitation is seen as more important than when applied to adults sentencing.

There are a number of statutory measures designed to rehabilitate youth offenders and prevent re-offending. The principle of the welfare of the child being of paramount importance (CA 1989 S1) is reflected in a number of the orders available to the courts. Although these will always need to be balanced with the need to punish and for this punishment to be seen, often to satisfy the desires of society generally.

The tension between punishment and rehabilitation will often surface amongst professionals working within the youth justice system. Generally the police and the courts are seen as there to exact punishment and retribution while social and youth workers are viewed as advocating a sentencing structure which focuses more on rehabilitation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is argued that one of the main issues as to why the needs are not being met is because of the tensions in the juvenile justice system itself. Delinquent behavior must be responded to only when competing mandates and priorities. The main focus of the juvenile justice system is rehabilitation for the youth, in performing this it must be taken in account that while holding juveniles for their behavior the community must also be protected.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Paper Part 1

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the 1980s to the 1990s there has been a surge in minors who commit violent crimes as shown in a research study conducted by the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch Currently. The information was based on federal and state correctional data related to race, history and nature of crimes committed by minors. The study showed inmates under the age of 18 in state prisons has more than doubled from 1985-1997. The study also shows that 61% of those minors admitted were convicted of violent offenses1. The Juvenile Court Act was founded in 18992 when the idea of reforming minors took place and the majority of crimes committed by minors were of minor misconduct. The justice systems were separated because adults were treated as criminals and minors were treated for rehabilitation. , created to rehabilitate and protect minors. The courts intended the system to be more informal and treat the juveniles rather than punish them. This system was not developed to undertake the current rise of…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If minors do not share the same rights as adults, then the legal system should not treat them as so. When a crime is committed, fair punishment is what every criminal expects when walking into the court room. However, certain journalists have proven that when juveniles commit a crime they are charged as children to a certain extent and that the legal system is quick to call them adults when they commit crimes that warrant adult punishment. The decision on trying children as adults has been an ongoing controversy, although opposing forces may think otherwise, children should not be tried as adults due to their lack of understanding of the crime committed and the consequences that follow.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Youth Criminal Justice Act

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The Youth Criminal Justice Act is a piece of Canadian legislation...that determines the way in which youths are prosecuted under Canada's criminal justice system." The act was implemented April 1, 2003, after "7 years, 3 drafts, and more than 160 amendments." The clearly stated purpose of the Youth Criminal Justice Act is "protection of the public through crime prevention, rehabilitation, and meaningful consequences (s.3(1)(a)(I-iii))." For a better understanding on whether the courts were following the Youth Criminal Justice Act's principles in practice, I went to Edmonton Law Courts and sat in on youth court. After reviewing the act in theory and practice, I argue that the Youth Criminal Justice Act is doing a fair job in fulfilling its' purpose, but does need some improvements.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile and Adult Courts

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The “Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis” paper will compare juvenile courts with adult courts. This paper will present an overview of the juvenile justice system, a point-by-point comparison between juvenile and adult courts. The adjudication process by which a juvenile is transferred to the adult court system. This paper will also discuss the implications of the following for youthful offenders: The trend of increasing the use of waivers, and the trend of remanding juveniles to adult court for processing. The last topic addressed in this paper will be the societal implications of abolishing juvenile court.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Community Justice

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I’ve learned in previous chapters and during one of my essays, community justice is a type of reform. One of its focus’s is to try and prevent crime. It also embraces the nonpolice functions of adjudication, sanctioning, and correcting (Clear, Hamilton, Cadora, 2011). Traditional correctional functions include reforms for offenders such as parole and probation.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When someone mentions the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), some would argue that there is no purpose for it. Some believe that the age boundary is inappropriate; some believe that children should not have reduced sentences and special rights; and some may think that a youth’s criminal record should be accessible in the future. If one would look at all of the positive aspects, statistics, and examples that apply to the YCJA, then they would better appreciate the statute that applies to the young adults of Canada.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Youth crimes have been risen 5% annually since 1990’ because the leniency of the youth justice system, other approaches should be implemented to accommodate the youth criminals. Punishment is one the better ways to result in a decrease in the frequency or seriousness of criminal activity; and some of those ways are incompatible with the concept of rehabilitation. People neither expect youths to be criminal nor expect crimes to be committed by them; the unforeseen intersection between childhood and criminality creates a dilemma that most of us find difficult to resolve. The only way out of this dilemma is redefine the offense as something more serious or redefine the juvenile offender as someone who is not really a child.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Young Offenders Act has been well received by commentators. It embraces the welfare model in relation to juvenile justice and promotes the rehabilitation of young offenders over traditional means of punishment and dealing with crime. The Act uses diversionary measures to find solutions to juvenile offending.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act is the law that governs Canada's youth justice system. It applies to youth who are at least 12 but under 18 years old, who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. In over a century of youth justice legislation in Canada, there have been three youth justice statutes: the Juvenile Delinquents Act (1908-1984), the Young Offenders Act (YOA) (1984-2003), and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) (2003-present). A set of amendments to the YCJA was adopted by Parliament in 2012. The purpose of this document is to explain the background of the YCJA, to provide a summary of its main provisions and the rationale behind them, and to highlight the experience under the YCJA.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indigenous Youth Offenders

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The criminal justice system uses a range of policies and international standards of law when dealing with young offenders. This is particularly evident when dealing with the rights of a child. The NSW criminal justice system draws legislation from such acts as the Young Offenders Act (1997), the United Nations CROC (1990) and the Law Enforcement (power and responsibilities) Act (2002). All of these acts of legislation are used to define that rights that each and every child has under Australian and NSW law. The criminal justice system portrays these acts and uses them to deal effectively with young offenders. Children have equal rights enjoyed by adults when arrested and questioned, although they also have other special protections and privileges due to their vulnerability and immaturity. They are as…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During this essay I am to discuss the developing knowledge and practice to do youth Justice. I will firstly look at the Principles of effective practice and then aim to explain how these principles are linked to my own work and experience. I will go on to discuss the use of principles of effective practice. I will then conclude with the outcome of my findings.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice Act 1992

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act 1992 is to establish a code for dealing with youth offenders under the age of 17. The Act regulates the courts dealings with children who come in contact with the youth justice system. This includes police response, diversionary options of rehabilitation against detention, multiple sentencing options, operation of detention centres and recognition of family and community with particular reference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island communities. A review of the former Juvenile Justice Act 1992 commenced in May 2007. This review was an assessment of legislation to ensure it is providing the best practice youth justice system that has the capacity to adequately respond to demands and challenges of today’s…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Youth Justice in Uk

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the last hundred years, juvenile justice is concentrating on punishment and welfare both. England earlier had the unfortunate system of juvenile justice of imprisonment, transportation and even death penalty, regardless of the age of the offender. Now children and adults are treated differently and juveniles have their own courts to try their offences. A large number of them are considered to be suffering from behavioural disorders and in such cases, they are sent for psychiatric treatments and psychotherapies. The Punishments are milder keeping in view of the offence and the age of the offender and his responsibility in the crime. The most important point here is the welfare of the child and delinking him from later life offences .…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various adaptations and amendments to the laws surrounding Children and Young people exist which aim to reflect the morals of our changing society. The legal implications and adaptations in relation to Children and Young people have been effective in engaging with the rights of children and young people, as well as to find a morally-liable outcome to any criminal proceedings that directly involve a child or young person. This is evident in the effectiveness of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as the effectiveness of the Children's Courts and Young Offenders Act.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics