Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

How would you characterize the women of "The Trial" by Franz Kafka? Do they seem like real people?

Powerful Essays
1391 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How would you characterize the women of "The Trial" by Franz Kafka? Do they seem like real people?
"The Trial", a novel written by Franz Kafka, has been considered to be one of the greatest novels of the 20th century. However, it has also been greatly controversial, and has gone from being burned, to being praised since its publication. Throughout The Trial, Kafka had created a surrealistic atmosphere, which is not only evident by the events in the book, but also by the characters. Particularly, the women in the novel are peculiar, and have various bizarre effects on the protagonist, Joseph K. The characterization of these women is quite complex, and varies from them having insignificant, to significant roles.

As the novel progresses, the women in the novel become increasingly important. In the beginning of "The Trial", we are introduced to women such as Frau Grubach, who has an insignificant role in his trial, to Elsa, to Fraulein Bustner, to the washer woman, and finally Leni, who has significant information involving his trial. However, even though these women all have some humane characteristics, they also all seem to be quite surreal.

In the very beginning of the novel, the landlady, Frau Grubach is introduced. K. mentions her in the first paragraph when he is describing her, and his breakfast's absence. We are told that Frau Grubach regards K. highly, and he is her favorite border, however she seems to lack interest, and avoids involvement with K.'s case, reacting in ways that make K. think to himself "She seems to think it not quite right that I should mention it. All the more need for me to do so. I could not mention it to anyone but this old woman." This not only reveals that K. believes she is acting awkwardly when he mentions the arrest, but it also reveals K.'s need for support, and how he could not have mentioned it to anyone else at the time.

It is also evident that Frau Grubach cares about K., and that she is on his side, but seems to think it unnecessary for her to know a lot about the trial, even if "it is a matter of your happiness, and I really have that at heart, more perhaps than I should, for I am only your landlady". This shows that even though she cares, she knows her position, and tries not to cross the line of having K. be nothing more to him than a border.

Subsequently in the novel, we are introduced to Elsa, who works as a waitress in a wine restaurant. He mentions her when contemplating about whether or not to visit her that night or not. It is quite clear that they are on good terms; otherwise he would not go to visit her so late in the night. However, she is not mentioned further in the book, so it is likely that she and K. are just having a sexual relationship. This is a possibility because of her absence throughout K.'s trial, thus making the reader believe she is not important to him, yet they are also friendly enough for him to pay her visits late at night.

The following woman present in the book is Fraulein Burstner. Fraulein Bustner is a resident at the same house. K. was earlier told by Frau Grubach that Fraulein Bustner comes home late at nights, and that she has seen her with various men. This is an indication that she has something more than a friendship with these men. As Fraulein Grubach described, "...she should have more pride, should keep herself more to herself. This very month I have met her twice already on outlying streets, and each time with a different gentlemen." When K. was told this, he had a "sudden fury", which warns her not to speak this way about Fraulein Bustner again. This shows that K. has a certain liking to Fraulein Bustner, and that he regards her quite highly.

When K. waits for Fraulein Bustner to come back, it is late and she is tired, but she insists on talking with her. However, their conversation loses its confidentiality, when it is obvious that the neighbor is listening in. In order to calm her down, K. kissed her in order to avoid her from losing control, and waking up the other neighbors. K. eventually is forced to leave, when she becomes uneasy with the fact that he is in her room. This is very strange, because it seems as if she is more uneasy about the fact that he is in the room, rather than the fact that he kissed her. This is surely a factor as to why she does not seem real.

The next woman K. has involvement with, is the washerwoman in the court, who is married to the Court Ushers. This washerwoman gets on K. very angry during his first day in trial, due to a commotion by her and a student having physical contact with each other in the middle of his speech. This makes him furious, and so when he sees her again the following Sunday, he does not take any interest in her, until she makes a move on him. However, she is taken away once again by the following student, and he has his way with her. This is surely surreal, due to the fact that no woman would tolerate having a man have his way with her so easily and publicly if she were married. It is definitely absurd, and the fact that she believes it isn't bad, by exclaiming "Let him alone! Oh please, let him alone!" when K. tries to save her, makes her even more absurd.

"I'll go with you wherever you like, you can do with me what you please, I'll be if I can only get out of here for a long time, and I wish it could be forever." When the washerwoman says this, it is evident to K. that she is easy access for opening another sexual relationship, and is furious when he is deprived of it by another man. This also shows that she is peculiar due to the fact that she has a husband, and doesn't even regard the bond to have any meaningfulness.

The following woman we are introduced to is the lawyers nurse, Leni. She sets up a plan in order to lure K. out from having a conversation with the lawyer, in order for her to have her way with him. She confesses what she planned, and then they get physically involved. This is extremely strange, because they hadn't even met formally, but she had already wanted something from K. A woman of that time would have most likely not have been so open to sexual acts, especially in her masters own house. This is totally unreal, however Kafka seems to have a method of writing, which makes this all seem quite normal at the time of reading. Furthermore, it is not customary for a woman at that time to give a man she barely knows a key to her masters house. It is extremely out-of-the-ordinary.

In a patriarchal society such as the one they live in at the time, would certainly not tolerate such acts. It is as if K. is using these women in order to forget about his trial, and so it does not take over his life. However, he does not involve himself with women in high society, and just uses them as material possessions rather than people, which do not require high social status in order for his lust to be fulfilled. However, as the book progresses, the women he is involved with are more involved with the case. For example, the washerwoman and Leni have information about the case, as opposed to Fraulein Bustner or Elsa. Thus, in the end, he does benefit from these sexual relationships; however he could have probably tried to find better methods for receiving information.

They all have surreal roles throughout the novel, and are in conclusion not like real people. All five women he is involved with during the trial are peculiar, and are only involved with him so he can receive information or a sense of serenity within the course of the trial. All of the women except for Frau Grubach are thought of as having sexual activity with him, and are flirtatious. They have no opinions, feelings, or thoughts on K.'s current situation; they seem more like objects, than real people.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    · Page 39: "I think you know. But I'm not quite sure why're being so coy about it." - she knows that Gerard is aware that he can appeal - senses that he is possibly hiding something, which is preventing him to appeal. After realising that Gerard is beginning to take a liking towards her, it seems that she uses this opportunity to inform him that she wants to help him and to find out the truth about what really happened…

    • 2468 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What caught my attention to this play was that the two authors were passionate about this theme for the play and obviously researched the history of the actual trial, in order to portray it as realistically as possible. This hard work and attention to detail created a very informative and memorable play. (Although some…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper focused on how they had their lives turned upside down, their betrayal to their husbands, and their representation of the whole society. These comparisons are relevant because Mary’s society limits her capability and they are unable to reach their full potential. Mildred's society limits their knowledge by banning books. They are selfish and their lack of concern for the rest of the world leads to their destruction. We can learn from the mistakes they made so that we do not repeat them. The life in Fahrenheit 451 is similar to ours. Both of our communities like to watch many violent T.V. shows and by being exposed to these types of shows we are becoming more accepting to violent actions. The three similarities between Mildred in Fahrenheit 451 and Mary in “Lamb to the Slaughter” are obvious and call for elaborate…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Undoubtedly these two trials have many similarities despite one of the trials being mainly a focal point for achievement in the literary world. An identical example between these trials are the historical culture in abundance with many of the families included in the trial, an example being the Ewells compare to be utterly consistent with the two young prosecutors in the way they live their life. Another of these many similarities includes the bizarre assumption by the jury that the accused were already virtually guilty before the trial had even begun due to the mainstream’s coarse view of African Americans and how African Americans are nothing better than a common house animal, punished at the dominant being’s will. This point is shown, beyond doubt, when one of the women prosecuting the Scottsboro Boys, Ruby Bates admits that neither herself nor her friend Victoria Price were every raped in anyway by any of the nine accused African Americans. Even after this incriminating confession, the series of trials continue .…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Jury of Her Peers” is longer and more in detail as it is describing a story and not showing or using any visuals as in case of the “trifles” . There has been a clear mention of the fact that the women are considered inferior in the society in both the play as well as the story. Men do not consider the actions of the women as important and only consider those actions as trifles. For example . when the sheriff reaches up into the cupboard and and his hand became sticky ,the women sadness that her preserved fruit had frozen .Instead of recognizing all the hard work of the lady the sheriff exclaims , “Well , can you beat the women ! Held for murder and worryin’ about her preserves . From the very first part women have been shown as having timid personalities as they entered the door very slowly and close near the door close to each other as if they are an entirely different part of the society which is inferior to men . Another instance was when the women looked closely at the quilt and are made fun of after which they even feel abashed by the men . Ultimately it was these small things that lead to the finding of the important evidence by the women which confirmed that Mrs Wright was the murderer. Glaspell wants to emphasize the fact that the actions…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A compare and contrast Analysis of Frank Kafka’s, The Metamorphosis and The Things They Carried.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial draws on a rather bleak image of humanity the crime in question is first degree murder most serious charge tried in our courtroom’ the victim is not portrayed as innocent but as a ‘tough, cruel, primitive kind of man’ the lawyers on the case too are described as not doing their job properly and lacking the motivation to investigate the possibilities…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women have always played a major role in society. They play very essential roles such as the carrier of the life cycle. They were created to be a companion of man. Overtime women have varied their roles in today’s society. As seen in the novel’s The Crucible by Arthur Miller and The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, women can travel outside of society’s norms. Women also played major role in both novels. These stories were written by totally opposite authors but the settings of these stories are the same, the Puritan era. Both authors portrayed the strengths of women while also portraying their downfalls too.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) What is the role of women in the novel? Make specific references to female characters. What does this tell us about the Kravitz world?…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court trial scene embodies everything that is contained within the novel. All events that occur throughout the entire novel are a repercussion of Jefferson's court case. These circumstances set up the tone that is simply perceived throughout the novel. Gaines tone in the novel shifts as the novel progresses.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1950s America saw the nation fall into a period of national tension and idealogical turmoil following the McCarthy Trials and the Cold War, which produced a flourish of works such as Regnald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men.’ Using a jury of twelve anonymous men, the play scrutinizes both the strengths and flaws of the American judicial system. The case of a fictional “delinquent” who faces capitol punishment under charges of patricide acts as a vehicle to examine the moral dilemma of prejudice and judgement, and its importance, underpinning American jury rooms in a time of profound social division. Through his structuring and characterizations, Rose does not merely attack the system, but contends is functionality stems from the very individuals within it, and their ability to see with objectivity and compassion.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trifles Feminist Analysis

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the play, “Trifles,” Susan Glaspell demonstrates the inequality that occurs between men and women during the 20th century. From the opening scene, the two women are not given much attention unlike the men, until they are separated from them and become the main characters. Although the women are seen as inferior to men, they prove that they are much more capable as they are the ones who solve the case by thinking outside the box. They find the real motive behind Mrs. Wright’s action and are able to understand her doing because of the way women were treated back then. Even though both women decide to defend Mrs. Wright by hiding the evidence, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters sympathize with her, but for different reasons.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joe Cinque - Law

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Helen Garner’s novel, Joe Cinque’s Consolation, questions aspects of the law and justice through her representation of characters in the novel. Her quest narrative form assists in the representation and creation of certain characters in the novel and she successfully twists the gender roles of these positions. Garner questions whether retribution can be achieved through the court system, and whether criminals should be punished or rehabilitated. The Cinque’s exclusion from the trial detracts from the connotations of justice and Garner attempt to console the Cinque’s through this narrative.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel the character, Marlow, narrates his thoughts about the female race and his few encounters with women. He describes them to be naive due to their belief in an utopian world, and “how out of touch with truth [they] are.”(10) To Marlow, “they…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays