Preview

Why Would A Monarch Have Power Regents

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Would A Monarch Have Power Regents
How much influence can any one leader have over their state? A leader has a enormous impact over the state they have power over. The people of a state may even worship their leader. Since everything is determined by the leader, the state's way of working is influenced and adapted due to the leader's beliefs. It depends on the leader as well, if it's a hard working leader then they have a bigger influence than a lazy leader would have over their population.

2. Why would a monarch have a regent once they’ve reached adulthood?
A monarch may have a regent after they’re an adult due to a reason such as an illness that would make them incapable of making decisions. If they are injured and in the hospital unable to lead or if they have a mental illness which would affect their way of leading drastically they would have a regent. A monarch would have a regent if they’re incapable of making decisions for their people.

3. Is the socio-economic background of a leader important? Why or why not?
Yes, because a person, and a leader has their own bias which affects and impacts the way they lead. It affects the policies and laws they make. It helps us to know how the ruler thinks and what kind of decisions they’re going to make when gaining leadership/power. This is for in ancient history and today. The history of a …show more content…
The American Revolution influenced the French, and the French saw many things they liked within the US. They ended up siding with Americans to go against their common rival Britain. France adopted some of the United States’ ways (for example the constitution, The declaration of Rights Of Man). The French are being forced to fight with Americans for rights they don’t have which gets them thinking that they can fight for their own rights back in France. Due to the fact that they have to fight for rights in America, it inspires them to do the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Seven Year War Dbq Analysis
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Seven Year War Dbq Analysis

    The French and Indian War is to blame for the American Revolution. Ideologically, it brought up colonial feelings of resentment toward Britain. It also changed the political relationship between England and its colonists because the English were forced to unfairly tax them due to their economic0al struggles. The colonists in turn, boycotted, thus further damaging their economic relationship with their mother country. After the French and Indian War, America drastically changed would never be the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did France Enter The American Revolution
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did France Enter The American Revolution

    Influential figures like Count de Vergennes advocated joining the colonists in fighting Great Britain in hopes of simultaneously reestablishing France as Great Britain's peer; however, out of fear of raising tensions with Great Britain, advocates of the revolution failed to gain the necessary support to enter the war during the first years of the revolution. As such, for the first three years of the revolution it looked as if Great Britain would defeat the colonists, but to no avail, in 1778, France formally – and publicly – allied themselves with the colonists in the hopes of getting retribution against Great Britain for the Seven Years War, keeping Great Britain from holding too much power in the Western world, and keep France's own colonies stable in terms of trading. It is important to keep in mind that France entered into the American Revolution at two different times: the first being when politicians became increasingly curious over what was happening in the colonies and began to intervene in secret, and the second being when France formally and publicly allied themselves with the American…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Qualities of a Good Ruler- Based on Niccolo Machiavelli's - "The Prince."
    • 1032 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Qualities of a Good Ruler- Based on Niccolo Machiavelli's - "The Prince."

    In history, the main reason why a nation prospers is because of its leader. The best written piece I have come across on this topic is Niccolo Machiavelli's book, "The Prince". A leader should be intelligent, strong, caring and devoted to his subjects. Although people have different opinions in the qualities of a good ruler, all believe that a leader should help his nation grow and thrive.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Two Anthems
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Two Anthems

    The French people had lost faith in their country and needed to be reminded of their patriotism. The horrible treatment received at the hands of the monarchy had brought down the peoples spirits. They had to be reminded of the great county they lived in and that their freedom was worth fighting for.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sargon The Great Ruler
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sargon The Great Ruler

    The most important quality of being a good leader is being able to make decisions that no one else could make. One trait of a complex society is social stratification, the specialization of jobs as more and more people are integrated into a certain society. With social stratification comes people of different skills. Certain people are farmers, others are merchants, and then there are rulers such as Sargon. As Crone states, “The more people differ from one another, the more they come to depend on formal rules for peaceful interaction”…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did King George Abuse His Authority
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did King George Abuse His Authority

    King George III is an example of an individual who abused his authority. When George became Britain’s monarch, his primary objective was help Britain prosper. As the Thirteen Colonies were established over the years, George slowly began cementing his extensive authority over them as a way to make profits. He coveted obedience from the colonists and sent British troops to keep them in line. He started abusing his power when he began unreasonably taxing the colonies, leading to outraged colonists rebelling against the mother country. King George’s narrow mindset pushed him toward putting the British over the colonists and ultimately resulted…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Archetypes In Education
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Archetypes In Education

    Being a leader is an influential role to have. You will agitate many, but you will empower many more. You need to have focus, and stand your ground, while listening and comforting others. Being a ruler takes confidence, and fairness into account, but may stray away when the focus turns to control and entitlement. This archetype pulls every aspect of my life together, the good and the bad, and shows the true me. I am the…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Traditional Monarchs
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Traditional Monarchs

    In traditional monarchies the king held power and his wife provided heirs. Defying this tradition are queens regnant, queens in their own right who hold the same power as a king. Some of the most notable rulers in history hold this title. They, unlike their male counterparts, are more determined to be remembered. Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great, and Victoria are exemplary female monarchs who broke tradition.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Monarchy
    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument Against Monarchy

    The best example of this is King Louis XIV. His legacy lives on today as the Sun King. He chose this as a symbol of his power claiming that he was divine and infallible. With this he changed the monarchy because he refused having a minister. His death proceeded his 77th birthday by four days, he was in power the longest of any European monarch at the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The British Monarchy
    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The British Monarchy

    A monarchy is political system based upon the undivided sovereignty or rule of a single person. The term applies to states in which supreme authority is vested in the monarch, an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his position through heredity. Succession usually passes from father to son or follows other arrangements within the family or the monarchical dynasty. In particular, the British monarchy is the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories, which traces its origins back to the 11th century. With regard to the statement that the British monarchy is an outdated governmental structure that has no place in the modern world, as far as I am concerned, I do not agree with it, because I believe that the British monarchy has its advantages and disadvantages and should not be labeled as outdated in our modern world, because being outdated does not mean that it does not work properly.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prachao Taksin Maharat, King of Thonburi
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prachao Taksin Maharat, King of Thonburi

    For the United States, they had good leaders like John F, Kennedy and Martin Luther King who made important contributions to their people. Same as Thailand, we also had a plenty of good leaders like King Taksin Maharat who fought against Burmese to take Thailand back from them and reunited Thai people. That is why I consider him as an important leader because without him, there would not be Thailand today.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Great Leader
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Great Leader

    The way we think about leadership affects how we perceive the leaders around us. For instance, if we expect a leader to be a hero, we are likely to see someone who takes charge to save the day as a good leader and someone who asks everyone’s opinions and lets the group make decisions as weak. Alternatively, if we think a leader should be collaborative and focused on making sure decisions arise from the group, we would view someone who is directive as aggressive or a tyrant.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Monarchy
    • 3215 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Monarchy

    The monarchy The appearance The position of the monarch in Britain is a perfect illustration of the contradictory nature of the constitution. From the evidence of written law only, the Queen has almost absolute power, and it all seems very undemocratic. The American constitution talks about government of the people for the people by the people. There is no law in Britain which says anything like that. In fact, there is no legal concept ofthe people at all. Every autumn, at the state opening of Parliament, Elizabeth II, who became Queen in 1952, makes a speech. In it, she says what my government intends to do in the coming year. And indeed, it is her government, not the peoples. As far as the law is concerned, she can choose anybody she likes to run the government for her. There are no restrictions on whom she picks as her Prime Minister. It does not have to be somebody who has been elected. She could choose me she could even choose you. The same is true for her choices of people to fill some hundred or so other ministerial positions. And if she gets fed up with her ministers, she can just dismiss them. Officially speaking, they are all servants of the Crown (not servants of anything like the country or the people). She also appears to have great power over Parliament. It is she who summons a Parliament, and she who dissolves it before a general election (see chapter 10). Nothing that Parliament has decided can become law until she has agreed to it. Similarly, it is the Queen, and not any other figure of authority, who embodies the law in the courts. In the USA, when the police take someone to court to accuse them of a crime, the court records show that the people have accused that person. In other countries it might be the state that makes the accusation. But in Britain it is the Crown. This is because of the legal authority of the monarch. And when an accused person is found guilty of a crime, he or she might be sent to one of Her Majestys prisons. Other…

    • 3215 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Advantages of Monarchy
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Advantages of Monarchy

    Monarchs are generally born to be Monarchs. They are born in the palace, which becomes both a home and a school. They are trained for good governance, taught to be polite, calm, patient, obedient and helpful and hence a healthy lifestyle is established. Eventually a monarch becomes mature enough to rule the nation, even at a young age.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nursultan Nazarbayev And Najib Razak
    • 1114 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nursultan Nazarbayev And Najib Razak

    Since ancient times, the ability to lead people is considered as the strongest quality and an undeniable advantage of successful person. If we look back at history, we can notice that all heads of states, the hetman and different leaders had this quality. Moreover, a public gave preference to leaders who are brave, who are not afraid to lead people, to declare war against another state, to take responsibilities in making important decisions for the country. People had a clear generated picture of the leader, they needed a person who is able to take care of them and protect them from danger. A person, who did not have leadership qualities, had no chance to become the ruler. Before we consider the basic qualities of a leader we should understand who is a leader. The leader is a person with clearly defined objectives and principles. Leader is not afraid of danger, he is always ready to take responsibilities for his own actions. Responsibility is a very important quality for a leader. If people, who trust their leader, will find out that their leader is not ready to take responsibilities for his actions, they will feel very insecure and immediately will re-elect another leader. Nowadays, the concept of leadership is applicable almost everywhere - in families, in companies, in politics. In the latter case, the leader has a clear position, referred to as a "president." If you draw a parallel with the history, the role of the president is very similar to the role of leader. Relationships between different countries depend on President’s actions, their political and economic cooperation, so the president must be a leader of the country, the guarantor of the constitution.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics