Preview

Argument Against Monarchy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument Against Monarchy
An Argument Against Monarchy Monarchy as a governmental system clearly has numerous downfalls for the majority of people. The working class (bourgeoisie) rarely wins. It puts people into a hierarchical system based not on the merit of their character and work ethic but instead from the family they were born into. Those born into the few available positions of power in a monarchy benefit the most. This system can function and create civilizations that exude power and wealth but at a price that is far too costly. The price of freedom is expensive, but there is much more to gain in a decentralized government where power is distributed through a subsidiarity-based organization.
In a democracy the people have the power, when paired with
…show more content…
How can one family line maintain the structure to rule from generation to generation? Ultimately they cannot. No matter what rate it comes erosion of health, wealth, or ethics will eventually bring a monarchy to its knees. There is no questioning the fact that overtime humans grow comfortable and accustomed to their power. When this happens they will be overthrown, sometimes for good and sometimes for the worst. This happened to Nero in the year 68. His negligence of a threat ended up costing him his life.
Though the evidence is stacked against monarchy in the long term, the sort term benefits are immense. Excluding the missed potential of the people, the reign of power can be grand. The best example of this is King Louis XIV. His legacy lives on today as the Sun King. He chose this as a symbol of his power claiming that he was divine and infallible. With this he changed the monarchy because he refused having a minister. His death proceeded his 77th birthday by four days, he was in power the longest of any European monarch at the
…show more content…
Americans are granted the ability to chase “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. This is a freedom that cannot be found in monarchies. The working man can rise to the top, while the man born into wealth and power can equally fall, all based on their character and skills. This harbors wealth and prosperity for all who work. Living by the Bible, 2 Thessalonians 3:10 King James Version (KJV)
“For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.” All people are granted inalienable rights and freedom to change for the better or worse. In conclusion, the downfalls of Monarchy exist primarily in the ethical realm. The bourgeoisie lives are dictated by chance alone and true equality is suffocated. The hierarchical system is destructive to society. Those who are born into power no matter how terrible or great their character is remain. The argument for monarchy is futile from a holistic perspective, when taking into account the value of all people. Ultimately it can be determined that societies function best when people are judged and rewarded on their character rather than inheritance. Freedom is a rare blessing and as Ronald Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using ancient Sparta as a case study, I would say that the Greeks did not place a lot of emphasis on monarch. In fact their perception and relationship to monarchy was very subdued .The Spartans operated a bi-monarchial system of monarchy .In essence; they did not value monarchy, in the sense that monarchy can only be practiced absolutely for it to have a true meaning.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A monarchy is a governmental system in which the head of state is a single person. The first ruler of Rome and the founder of Rome is Romulus. During this time period Rome’s power was passed down by blood. This is one of the reasons why monarchies fell. Slaves, and other lower class citizens revolted at the fact that they couldn’t…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British Monarchy is a show piece that stands to represent the old ways of the world. They have been losing power gradually but steadily over the last two hundred years. In Australia their presence serves as merely ceremonial with a little political power that is seldom used. However removing the monarchy from the structure of our country would mean losing sporting opportunities, relations with UK and an affinity with our culture as an English colony which steadily grew from rags to riches under hard circumstances.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A monarch may have a regent after they’re an adult due to a reason such as an illness that would make them incapable of making decisions. If they are injured and in the hospital unable to lead or if they have a mental illness which would affect their way of leading drastically they would have a regent. A monarch would have a regent if they’re incapable of making decisions for their people.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism has a great power that monarch, monarchy is the type of country that tends to be reported to the awe and respect.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paleolithic vs. Neolithic

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At this time, all governments are monarchies. The king usually had divine and unquestionable power until the area over which he rules starts failing. Then people rebel.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some can agree that when you give someone too much power it can lead to a catastrophe. King Creon and Adolf Hitler both showed how to much power can be a disadvantage and not an advantage to the people they lead.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paine stresses that, “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever,”. Government is supposed to be a representative of its people whose purpose is to serve their interests and not ones’ own self-interest. However, the monarchy continuously supports its interest through reining kings and queens who have direct family relationships. This suggests that nothing will change because those in power will continue to govern according to their ancestors. “To the evil of monarchy we have added that of hereditary succession; and as the first is a degradation and lessening of ourselves, so the second, claimed as a matter of right, is an insult and an imposition on posterity.”…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq: the Enlightenment

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some of the ideas of the Enlightenment were used to challenge absolute monarchy. One example is given in Document # 1, Montesquieu who was a French philosopher during the Enlightenment, states, “There can be no liberty with the executive, legislative, and judicial powers are united in one person or body it a persons, because such concentration is bound to result in arbitrary despotism.” In this statement, Montesquieu is stating that liberty cannot exist where three powers of government are held by one person or body of persons. This is because then the people would not have rights for themselves. The idea was used to challenge an absolute…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coming from the system in the British system where monarchies were absolute in power, where the individuals did not get to voice their opinions…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitutional Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Monarchy functions by Parliament that consist of two houses which are the House of Lords and House of Commons. The House of Lords is a body of Monarch appointed by the Queen or King whereas the House of Commons is a body of elected officials voted in by the People. We have the Queen or King as the figurehead for our government. Parliament will be responsible but not limited to collecting taxes, declaring war, borrowing and coining money, naturalization, and impeachment. The people will have a say and with whom they elect into the House. There are more liberties that the people have but at regulated prices such as, the right to bear arms. People are allowed to bear arms but with more of a strict licensing to obtain a firearm. People have the right to marry no matter race, gender, preference, or religion. Also, gender equality and drinking and voting age are set at the legal age of 18 when people are able to join the military and risk their own life for their country. It doesn't seem to have many disadvantages as it is truly mixing royalty and commoners together. We made the terms and age which officials can…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keeping the monarchy in a democratic society, is the same as using a quill in a school filled with pencils. Despite an immense amount of progress involving the Canadian government, there is an extensive problem disturbing the system. The constitutional monarchy puts a figurehead as the highest position and representative of our Country. As stated in the constitution, our Queen’s power is entrusted to the Prime Minister and other elected figures, which makes the democracy overpower the monarchy (“The Monarchy of Canada 4). Along with going against the regulations that are placed over the other members of the government, royalty prevents growth, new ideas and denies the citizen’s power to choice their own leader.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Monarchy In Canada

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Canada continues to need as many historically based structures as possible to distinguish the country from its burgeoning, warmongering and oh-so-greedy neighbor to the south. The monarchy is an essential aspect to the functioning of an independent Canada. Make no mistake about it, a republic of Canada would be riper for absorption into the States, a move that would be led by conservative…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    European History

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages

    absolute monarchy is an illegitimate form of government because it infringes on the natural rights to life and liberty that everyone is born with.…

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays