Preview

Why Was Stalin The Dominant Leader Of The Soviet Union

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Stalin The Dominant Leader Of The Soviet Union
How did Stalin come to be the dominant leader of the Soviet Union?

On the eve of Lenin’s death, there was no real or clear successor who would take leadership of the party. Even before his death Lenin himself recognised that there would be a power struggle between two of the most prominent leaders in the party, Trotsky and Stalin, which he expressed in his last testament (which was shielded from the public eye until the early 1950’s). In Lenin’s last testament, he even went on to briefly assess members of the party which could result in good leadership within the party. Through reading the last testament it seems clear that Lenin preferred Trotsky as a person, even if he does mention that he can be arrogant, and this can also been seen with
…show more content…
Stalin seemed to be on good terms with Lenin until Stalin had spoken to Lenin’s wife Nadezhda Krupskaya following Lenin’s appraisal of Trotsky which Krupskaya had cited, and Lenin certainly did not like the way Stalin had spoken to her. In short, he amended his last testament and was making it clear that Stalin had to go because he could not be trusted, was rude and was an arrogant. In the party, Stalin had always been perceived as a dull, mediocre and uninteresting person who was happy to get on with dull, mediocre and uninteresting jobs which mainly consisted of administration and he proved he was good at this which was why he was ultimately appointed as the General Secretary of the party among other positions prior to this one – a potentially dire move by Lenin following his death simply because it put Stalin in a position where could place his friends and allies in high positions in the pending power struggle. This then raises the question how exactly Stalin came to be the dominant leader, and I will address potential reasons which could be argued as to …show more content…
It can be noted that each of his opponents, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Rykov and Bukharin each had their flaws in the struggle for power – some of them being prominent in their bid for power within the party. Trotsky was Stalin’s main opponent and always seemed to be a favourite of Lenin’s which would seems obvious why Stalin would have such a vendetta against him, not to mention that Stalin was denounced by Trotksy during the October Revolution which Lenin and Trotsky had planned together – and so viewed as one of the more heroic contenders within the party. Trotsky was a gifted theorist and excelled as the commentator, critic, and executor of policies and was noted to be an enthusiastic and influential orator – often inspiring the loyalty of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The personalities of each individual contender played a role in establishing their position and reputation within the Party, which ultimately would strengthen or weaken their chances of becoming leader. Trotsky was a passionate member of the party and had the strongest Revolutionary record amongst all of his opponents. His leadership of the Red Army allowed the communists to seize power in the October Revolution, enhancing his reputation, despite being labeled a traitor when he sided with the Mensheviks in 1903. However, he was noted as ‘arrogant’ in Lenin’s testament and managed to gain many enemies within the party as he felt there was no need to endear himself to his colleagues and he therefore displayed little respect towards them. This made him very unpopular and a tyrant to compromise with as he believed in debate as a way of solving issues and adopted other western ideas, tainting his image. Similarly, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Rykov allowed their unfavorable personalities to ruin their appeal within the party and all were criticised in Lenin’s testament, further diminishing their chances of success. Stalin also…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The big issues with the struggle for power was that after Lenin’s death the following leader was not selected by Lenin in his testament, this was because of the different personalities of each of the leaders and the places within the party. The most outstanding reason why there was a struggle for power. This was between all the political positions, left winged, right wing and central, this is due to the varied beliefs of each candidate. The main candidates that was most likely to take power included; Trotsky, who was renowned for his large input in the civil war being a big leader of the red army. Stalin who was high up in the party and was a very conniving, as well as devious person. This was because of his tactical manoeuvring that had taken place during the struggle for power. Lastly there was Bukharin who was also a big contender as he was close friends with Lenin and helped seize Moscow in the civil war. Two more contenders Zinoviev and Kamenev where also large contenders, I haven’t considered them as the biggest contenders for the power of Russia due to their political positioning within the parties as they went from Right to Left winged and therefore were seen as unreliable by the public.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite Lenin having preferences, nobody was aware of these preferences due to his testament not being publically shown – nevertheless, Lenin’s testament left no clear indication of whom he wanted to take over his reign. In his testament he clearly insinuates that none of the men leading the chase were capable of his role as they all leading Communists showed weaknesses. For example, Lenin knew Trotsky was an obvious contender for power once he died, however Lenin also understood that Trotsky had personal downfalls and he had no real and secure fan-base. It was clear to Lenin that Trotsky was good at organisation due to the Red Armies triumph during the civil war, however Lenin questioned Trotsky’s ability to rule and lead the USSR. The fact that Lenin’s Testament was never shown was very lucky to one contender, Stalin, as in that Testament, it stated how Lenin did not want Stalin to succeed him due to reasons such as, Stalin arguing and disrespecting Lenin’s wife. The Testament not being publicised was a huge factor as to why there was no obvious successor to lead the USSR at the time of Lenin’s death as if it was shown, candidates such as Stalin would have been knocked of their stage and would no longer be a rival for power; thus making less contenders, consequently and easier and shorter struggle to find Lenin’s successor.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trotsky was the reason as to how the Bolsheviks gained so much power as he insisted on using ex-tsarist officers to train and control the red army. He used strict discipline in order to help the army and this greatly supported the Bolsheviks and helped them win the civil war. Trotsky also was the reason as to how the civil war was won, because not only did he recruit trained army officers- which was extremely difficult to do due considering most supported the whites- but also because he organized food and weaponry (8) and forced the red army to attack the Kronstadt sailors across melting ice, ruthlessly stooping the result and putting an end to the civil war. In other words, he won the civil war virtually single handed. This was one of the main reasons as to how the Bolsheviks consolidated their power and without the training of the army commanded by Trotsky, they wouldn’t have had the chance to be noticed. Furthermore, without Trotsky’s harsh commands and the declaration of “war is the instrument of policy” the civil war would’ve carried on, destroying the Bolshevik party and everything they had worked…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if one country’s dominance over your country changed your life for the worse? This is what was occurring to the lithuanians. During Stalin's rule, There were many things he did to ensure soviet dominance. Stalin had a five year plan. This five year plan was to gain complete soviet dominance through the secret deportation of Lithuanians to siberia. The lithuanians faced many hardships not only in Siberia but on the way there as well.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after Lenin’s rule there was a fight for power between Trotsky and Stalin. In the end, Stalin prevailed and earned leadership of the Soviet Union during the mid-1920s. However, once Stalin came to power, the lives of the society changed dramatically. Stalin’s wished to restore society which caused him to reverse Lenin’s previous work. Stalin revoked many laws concerning women’s emancipation because he wanted to strengthen tradition and build up the population.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As he went up in ranks in his Democratic party, he soon became the “secretary general of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, a role that embedded him to appoint his allies to government jobs and grow a base of political support”(C). When Lenin, the first leader, died, Stalin was placed into power, where he then became the absolute ruler of Russia. As a leader, he was fierce, a go getter. No matter what the cost, he did whatever he needed to do for the revolution and went to jail more than 18 times. However, he adapted a personality that was rude, sullen, and many other characteristics that cause people to push him away and or shun him, “He became more dedicated because of this isolation”(C).…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin had a grip on Russia and had enough power to change the entire country. Lenin appointed Stalin for the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was partly due to his popular policies, it was not just this that allowed Stalin also because of the mistakes made by other rivals and factors that played into his hands. For example Trotsky was a former menshevik which helped Stalin accuse him of not been a true Bolshevik.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paragraph will converse about the hatred between Stalin and Trotsky as both men fought for Lenin’s position (Getty, 1999). However once Stalin was in power, he exiled Trotsky because he was a political opponent (Getty, 1999). Stalin’s enemies were his political opponents and their followers. This will also discuss how Stalin’s political opponents were put on show trials, where they pleaded guilty to impossible charges of disloyalty (Getty,…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corruption In Animal Farm

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two were opposite in character and possessed different views for the future. Lenin informed the public of his wish to spread the revolution to surrounding nations while Stalin, opposed every word. In result, Stalin exiles Trotsky from Russia to eliminate any trace of competition. Stalin declares himself as dictator and has Trotsky and later assassinated. Stalin gains control of the Communist Party and gradually reverses the principles of Lenin and transforms the Soviet Union into a government very similar to…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays