Preview

Why Was Stalin Able to Win the Power Struggle?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Stalin Able to Win the Power Struggle?
The factors that contributed to Stalin becoming the next leader are plentiful and can mostly be divided into Stalin’s own strengths and the weaknesses of his most important rival, Trotsky. All the factors can also be linked in one way or another, as shall be seen in this answer.

One of the most important reasons why Stalin won the power struggle is that he used his high positions in the Communist party and the power that came with it to his advantage. Several factors fall under this category. Firstly is how Stalin used his position as General Secretary, as well as jealousies between the leaders and Trotsky’s illness to stage-manage Lenin’s funeral. To the general public, it appeared that Stalin was very close to Lenin, and as a result should become his successor.

In 1925, Trotsky was forced to resign as Commissar for War. This was a potentially powerful position because it meant, if need be, the army would be on Trotsky’s side. Of course, Stalin realised this and how much of a threat it would be to him, and so it was he who persuaded the party to outvote Trotsky. Stalin did this by using his control of the party appointments to his advantage, as well as the 1921 ban on faction and the fears and jealousies within the party.

Two years later, Stalin again used his power as General Secretary and the 1921 ban on factions, this time to manipulate party congress and elections to outvote his opponents. As a result, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and other left-wing Communists were expelled from the party; eliminating Stalin’s nearest rivals. Stalin used his party position to remove all Bukharin’s supporters from important positions, and could then put his own supporters in key jobs. This meant that those who could help Stalin were on his side, and he had effectively ended all Bukharin’s chances of becoming leader.

The second most important reasons for Stalin’s ability to win the power struggle are all to do with the fact that he did not propose any new policies.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The 5 contenders to become leader all had different ideologies which I agree to some extent was an important factor in the struggle for power after Lenin’s death. However, there were also 3 other reasons that could have led to a struggle, for example, the fact that they all had different personalities which meant that they connected with Lenin differently and gained respect from other members of the party and people of the public in different ways, such as their revolutionary record, and to a different extent. I also believe that the power struggle was not solely based on logical differences between the contenders but maybe a struggle based on egos.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the lead up to Lenin’s death and the years that followed, it would seem Stalin was in a weaker position than several of his opponents, as many doubted his role in the Revolution and, therefore, his role as a leader of the Party. Several factors played a role in allowing Stalin to be victorious, however, comparatively they hold varying significance. Despite the odds appearing to be stacked against him, Stalin’s ruthless personality and devious strategies allowed him to tactfully defeat his opponents, by manipulating his position within the Party, without having any real party appeal or Government powerbase and he ultimately emerged as leader of the Party in 1929, ending the leadership struggle.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An initial example of Stalin’s flawed leadership is that Stalin fled to his summer house in a time of stress when he thought that the war was lost. This left generals in charge, afraid of making major decisions because of the fear he had installed. This put the remaining generals in an awkward position as taking on a position of power could be misconstrued as treason. This was a clear weakness of Stalin’s character as him leaving for selfish reasons could have potentially cost the USSR victory. This supports the argument that victory was in spite of Stalin as it illustrates a weak willed nature of Stalin in this instance. Furthermore, in the time he was away the USSR machine was able to function without him showing Stalin perhaps wasn’t as vital as some may say.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He outsmarted his rivals (Ex. Trotsky) in order to win the power clashes and take control of the Communist Party of the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after Lenin’s rule there was a fight for power between Trotsky and Stalin. In the end, Stalin prevailed and earned leadership of the Soviet Union during the mid-1920s. However, once Stalin came to power, the lives of the society changed dramatically. Stalin’s wished to restore society which caused him to reverse Lenin’s previous work. Stalin revoked many laws concerning women’s emancipation because he wanted to strengthen tradition and build up the population.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin had a grip on Russia and had enough power to change the entire country. Lenin appointed Stalin for the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Veterinary career brochure

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It caused splits in the Communist Party – many Bolsheviks resigned. In his leadership struggle with Trotsky, Stalin was able to use these splits to seize power.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler acted as a politician. He campaigned under the National Socialist Party, or Nazi Party, which he was the founder. Published the book, Mein Kampf, outlining plans to restore Germany to power. Hitler also rallied the German people to promote his views and eventually gained the their trust, along with their vote. In the national election the Nazi Party won nearly 40% of votes enabling Hitler to become the chancellor of Germany the following year. Unlike Hitler, Stalin never attempted to deceive those of the Soviet Union, by being anything than a dictator from the beginning. Stalin did not humor constituents with an election but granted himself the title to rule, despite protests. Stalin, at one time, was on good terms with his predecessor, Vladimir Lenin. However, towards the end of his life, Lenin began to criticize Stalin’s character and his want for excessive power, urging within his testament, he be removed as General Secretary. Stalin, in discovery of Lenin’s discontent prevented his concerns to be released to the public. Following Lenin’s death, Stalin created alliances, to which he was able to secure the role of the Soviet Union’s leader by using underhanded tactics including, at times, assignation of his…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did Stalin come to be the dominant leader of the Soviet Union? On the eve of Lenin’s death, there was no real or clear successor who would take leadership of the party. Even before his death Lenin himself recognised that there would be a power struggle between two of the most prominent leaders in the party, Trotsky and Stalin, which he expressed in his last testament (which was shielded from the public eye until the early 1950’s). In Lenin’s last testament, he even went on to briefly assess members of the party which could result in good leadership within the party. Through reading the last testament it seems clear that Lenin preferred Trotsky as a person, even if he does mention that he can be arrogant, and this can also been seen with…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky was important in organising and coordinating the actual take over Petrograd in November, but Lenin was even more important because he was a strong leader who guided the Central Committee of the Party and pushed to make the takeover happen. For example, he produced the April Theses, which gave the Bolsheviks clear goals and made them better focused and organized, which was vital if they were going to take over successfully. He also put together the slogan ‘Bread, Peace, Land, and All power to the Soviets!’ which was designed to appeal to a broad range of people and he gave speeches and led rallies to inspire people to join the party. This meant that the Bolsheviks grew in popularity because they were offering people what they wanted – in particular they were the only party who opposed the war and all the other parties were associated with the much-disliked Provisional Government, which seemed to be doing…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April 1918 when Trotsky was appointed commissar of war by the government it was a major turning point in the civil war. Whilst Lenin was working on the land that the Bolsheviks had and trying to ensure that it did not fall into the hands of the whites, Trotsky began to eradicate people who were against the Bolsheviks.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the second half of the 1920s, Joseph Stalin set the stage for gaining absolute power by employing police repression against opposition elements within the Communist Party. The machinery of coercion had previously been used only against opponents of Bolshevism, not against party members themselves. The first victims were Politburo members Leon Trotskii, Grigorii Zinov'ev, and Lev Kamenev, who were defeated and expelled from the party in late 1927. Stalin then turned against Nikolai Bukharin, who was denounced as a "right opposition," for opposing his policy of forced collectivization and rapid industrialization at the expense of the peasantry.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays