Preview

Why Was Bismarck More Successful Than the Revolutionaries

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Bismarck More Successful Than the Revolutionaries
Bismarck was more successful at unifying Germany in the years 1848 – 1849 than the revolutionaries because Bismarck was the chief architect of the German unification, and he had Prussian support and the Prussian army. The revolutionaries were divided and had different aims for Germany.
The revolutionaries were deeply divided over the national question; should Germany be unified or not? They were also divided on social issues and constitutional grounds. The revolutionaries also had disputes over religious, regional and class divisions. However, all these issues helped Bismarck succeed because while the revolutionaries could not meet an agreement, this meant that he was gaining more support.
Bismarck wanted German unification, without Austria being part of it and with Prussian domination. Bismarck achieved this using the Prussia, which was the economically and by army the strongest area part of the German Confederation. German unification was the immediate result of three short wars; against Denmark in 1864, against Austria in 1864 and France in 1870 – 1871. The Prussian army played a large role in these three wars which brought German unification. The power in the German Confederation lay in the middle classes and nobility, and a strong liberal idea was increasing between the middle class and the nobility. However, the revolutionaries were divided because every single of the thirty-nine states which made up the German Confederation had their own interest and own will of being in domination in the unified Germany. The only common idea they had was the emergence of liberalism and the search for national unity. The idea of unity was largely influenced by the French Revolution is 1789 and further revolutions in 1848.
The revolutionaries failed to unseat the old rulers. The old rulers regaining their confidence organized counter revolutions in autumn of 1848, not least in Austria and Prussia. The rulers could organize counter-revolutions because they were still able

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As nationalism and its ideas began the journey across Europe, it started to unite people into nation states. One of the prime examples of this unity is Germany. Before Germany was united as a whole in 1871, the nation was separated into Germanic states and Prussia. Determined to unite them into Germany because of their ethnicity, Wilhelm hired Otto Von Bismarck, who was just the guy to bring everyone together. Bismarck had used carefully thought out tactics to unite the Germanic states. They needed Prussia in order to become a powerful Germany. “Prussia….could no longer carry alone the power Germany required for its security” [Bismarck, Document 5]. Finally getting Prussia after the Franco-Prussian War, Germany was then united as a proud and powerful Germanic nation. The French were also united through Nationalism. After realizing their…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kaiser had all power over Germany and with the desire for changes in the way Germany was run resulted in the improvements such as the creation of a constitution which was without a doubt crucial to the consolidation of the Kaisers position.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck set about trying to achieve his political objects by always siding with the party that would help him facilitate his needs. The years from 1871 to 1878 were known as Bismarck’s “Liberal Era” because Bismarck was sided with the National Liberal Party. He sided with the liberals and appeased them by introducing a number of reforms. He created a single currency the Mark; he set up the Reichstag Bank. Bismarck also abolished internal tariffs within the empire, standardised commercial law and other legal proceedings.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The people of Germany had always wanted independence and envied the freedom of the states of North America. There were many revolts within Germany and then there was the formation of the Frankfurt Assembly. The Frankfurt Assembly had offered Frederick William IV of Prussia a crown, in…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Revolution can either fail or succeed , many revolutions succeeded due to overthrowing their presidents , and kings and over all important people in that current era . For Example , The people of Nicaragua suffered a huge impact of oppression that led to the development of domination against the Sandinistas and a Revolution that impacted not only Nicaraguan people but also Latin American people with political and social effects .…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As governments experienced many revolutions and uprisings in the name of nationalism, some countries’ respective leaders realized that their traditional conservatism would eventually destabilize their authoritative legitimacy. Thus, leaders such as Otto von Bismarck adopted a new kind of conservatism, mixing both liberal, semi-socialistic and conservative policies in order to keep a balance that would ensure some stability in his state. For Otto von Bismarck, his international policies were more conservative; he promoted nationalism, unification, and state sovereignty. His domestic policies, however, were more liberal; he allowed for progressive social reforms and implemented separation of church and state.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historiographical debate of Bismarck’s impact upon Germany began almost immediately following his rise to prominence, as the primary initial historiography within Germany demanded a “strong man”[1], “who would cut the Gordian knot of nationalistic aspirations”.[2] Thus, German historians and the public throughout the 1850s and 1860s desired Bismarck to be portrayed as a benefactor to the German society; however Bismarck was also criticised as being detrimental to the development of Germany. The differing interpretations of Bismarck throughout the 1980s were “between the kleindeutsche and groβdeutshe historians”.[3] As the kleindeutsche historians argued that the unification was a “natural birth”, the groβdeutshe viewed it as a “caesarean section”.[4] The kleindeutshe school of though was largely composed of nationalist historians Heinrich von Sybel and Treitschke. Treitschke argued that the…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    austrian ascendancy

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Friedrich Wilhelm IV had rejected the offer of the crown of a united Germany he still hoped to unite Germany under Prussian leadership, this also shows us signs of future conflicts between Prussia and Austria. Friedrich Wilhelm attempted to join up with several other German states and draw up a constitution at what was named the ‘Erfurt Union’, however the foundations of the alliances were brittle from the start and after Austria got back up after settling the events in Hungary they were ready to re-assert their power in Germany; they attempted to intervene in the union and this caused many of the smaller states to break off and ultimately the entire union failed. This attempted union shows that Prussia was attempting to join Germany under Prussia’s control,…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    bismarck 1860's review

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto Von Bismarck and the events of the 1860’s played a very significant role to the unification of Germany by 1871. Some historians dispute upon the concept that Bismarck was solely a “master planner”, arguing that he was in fact a pragmatist or an opportunist meaning that he took advantage of the situations around such as the conditions of the countries. Historian Mosse notes that due to the conditions of intentional opposing countries (such as; Russia, Britain, France and Austria) Bismarck was in fact lucky with his successes.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck

    • 779 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otto Von Bismarck’s use of Realpolitik to unify Germany was necessary. Bismarck had been given powerful positions in the government and took advantage of it for his country. It is understandable that he may have been as a cheating and lying leader. But, Otto did everything right for his country even if it meant stealing or playing tricks. “But no matter how late he went to bed, Bismarck found it hard to sleep. He was constantly worried about the fate of his country.” (pg. 67 Bismarck Book). This quote explains how loyal and how much he cared about his country. He did not sleep well, his diet was awful, along with a bad drinking problem. His life change from being a conservative, trying to get back old teachings and government but, eventually became a liberal. At the need of the wars he was greatly appreciated for his contribution in uniting Germany. His ways of uniting were very unlikely but they worked very well, they may have been mean or rude but he had one thing in his mind, unite the northern Germany with southern Germany. Creating the German Nation.…

    • 779 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays