We as the United States of America should be
We as the United States of America should be
With the introduction of chemical warfare, a much greater risk is posed to neighboring friendly and partner countries in the region, particularly Israel, Jordan, Turkey, and Iraq. If the United States shows weakness towards Syria, or pulls back from its stance on the use of chemical weapons, the Assad regime could feel motivated to carry out more attacks, possibly outside of its immediate border. Any show of weakness would also embolden Syria to begin facilitating trade with local insurgent groups (Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, etc…) that would then use the weapons against U.S. allies in the region. Each witness today has…
What credibility? Arabs think that we intervene too much not too little and almost every conspiracy theory blames the US for the problems in their country. The problem isn’t with lack of American will to get involved but rather with the lack of trust in American aims. If we intervene with the Syrian civil war that will only increase this suspicion. In any case it is not enough to go to war over “US credibility”. It’s this kind of thinking that has gotten us into wars in the past; we do not need a repeat of Korea or…
The United States is known as one of the most powerful countries in the world, which can be something great for the nation but, it can also be the worst enemy for another country. With the power that the United States have, there can happen many things that are going to affect negatively to other countries. That was clearly demonstrated when the United States leaders decided to invade Iraq in 2003, Leader of the nation such as George W. Bush who was the President that time, he argued that there were many reasons why the U.S should attack Iraq. Some of those are; Iraq was was a threat for the national safety of the United States and other countries; also, Iraqis being overpressed by Saddam which makes their system non-democratic. The administration…
After a while, when the enemy sees they can’t defeat you, they will change methods to find weakness and use it against us. Our weakness cannot be trying to save every Syrian’s life through refugee camps. Because we can only bring a certain amount of refugees into the United States while simultaneously maintaining a structured control. Therefore, we should send more troops to Syria and help them defend their land. It is very simple, we fight in foreign land today or wait for tomorrow when we will have to fight in our…
Everyone acknowledges that the United States position was strange towards the bloody events in Syria, timing and whole achieved manner that West intervene in Libya, which had a similar mode for what happens in Syria makes us keep many question marks.…
For 6 years Syria has been at war with itself. In these 5-6 years many people have died. And many towns and cities left and ruined. The beginning of the fifth year of the war half a quarter million people have been killed. And over 10 million have been forced to leave their homes. And it all began with the actions of peaceful protestors. Which has cost the lives of 100,000 people and forced over two million to flee to the relative safety of neighboring countries. This conflict has captured the world’s attention because of the tactics employed by the president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad. Unarmed civilians were attacked and killed by government troops as they searched for the most effective and seemingly brutal method for quelling this uprising. Now there are some US politicians, who feel that it is the duty of our country to get involved militarily, but this with two wars already fought the past ten years, there seems to be little to no public support for this type of move. The United States is not the world’s policeman and should let countries solve their own problems.…
“The president has said that Syrian strongman Bashar Assad must be punished for an alleged Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack by his forces that left an estimated 1,400 dead, including hundreds of children.” (“Obama to make case for Syria strikes in prime-time speech Tuesday, won’t say if he’ll act without Congress’ OK”) Obama has a strong desire to use force in Syria, and he is trying his best to get as much support as he can from Congress. However, more Americans oppose than support conducting military airstrikes against Syria in response to reports that the Syrian government used chemical weapons. I am one who opposes President Obama’s military strike on Syria. In my mind, wars always cause negative effects on people and nations. In wars, a country must spend a lot of money to send troops, supplies, and artillery (tanks, rockets, missiles). This…
The Islamic State is a region in the Middle East that is an unrecognized state with a self-declared government. They control a landmass in northwest Iraq and eastern Syria. Since the removal of U.S troops from Iraq in 2011, tensions have escalated between the government and radical groups such as ISIS. ISIS has slowly been conquering land in Iraq. They are well trained and organized soldiers that have an effective use of propaganda. They completely instill themselves into communities, gaining trust and creating order. They conquer through promise of goodwill and freedom (Jawad al-Tamimi, 5). In August, President Obama issued aid to Iraqi citizens in the form of airdrops including food, water, supplies, etc. However, the aid from the United States quickly turned violent as they began implementing airstrikes on ISIS, keeping them from further advancing into Iraq. In order to send America a message, ISIS has released two videos beheading two Americans, James Foley and Steven Sotloff. These seemed to fuel Obama’s anger towards the radical group. More airstrikes have been deemed unproductive and ineffective, as fighter jets cannot destroy all individual ground soldiers (Letsch, 1). This is leading to western nations considering more drastic invasion tactics. There has been great criticism surrounding Obama issuing airstrikes as it is deemed an act of war, requiring congressional approval, which he did not receive.…
Let’s now look at the Syrian politics and its history in order to help us to understand the point the image hope to make. Bashar Al-Assad, the president of Syria, initially wanted to reform democracy for the country in the year 2000. However, in the year 2011, there was a civil uprising that requested him to resign, but he refused to do so. With the support from Russia and China, Assad used chemical weapon to destroy people against him. Up to now, according to Wikipedia.com,…
Bombs exploding, desert sand, AK-47s, RPGs and terrorists have taken over the news in the last twenty years. The Middle East has been a hot topic for as long as I can remember. Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Israel, Afghanistan, 9/11, Al Qaeda, and Arab Spring all come to mind when I think of the Middle East. The most current hotspot of activity is Syria. Syria has been in a civil war since 2011 between dictator Bashar Al-Assad and rebels. Since the start of the war, over 100,000 people have lost their lives and well over a million have been forced to relocate due to the fighting (Sharwood). In August of this year, over a thousand people were gassed with sarin, a chemical nerve agent that causes choking, burns, partial blindness, and skin falling off (“Chemical Weapons”). It is unclear at the moment who committed this atrocity, some claim it was Assad and others say the rebels used these weapons (Sharwood).…
Reports say that more than 40,000 people have died in the fights between President Bashar al-Assad's government and rebel forces that want him out. The Red Cross has called it a state civil war. It all started in March 2011 in a Syrian city called Deraa. People stormed the streets to protest after 15 schoolchildren had been arrested and reportedly tortured for writing anti-government graffiti on a wall. The protests started very calmly, only claiming to release the children and wanting democracy and greater freedom for people in the country of Syria. On March 18, the Syrian army opened fire on protesters, killing four. The next day at a funeral for one of the people who died the day before, the government opened fire again, and killed only one. The people of Syria quickly became angered and pissed off and wanted justice. Soon, the rest of the country heard about what had happened, and they too began to say that same thing, that the government is unjust. The protestors began to take action. They wanted the president, Bashar al-Assad to resign. Bashar al-Assad refused to resign, but claims to change a few things about how the country is run, but the protesters did not believe it one bit. As it may sound like everyone in Syria is against him, there are still plenty of people that support the president and his government. The main force opposing the president is the Free Syrian Army. No armed troops from the UN have been sent in yet because everyone in the UN has not agreed on it. Russia and China have yet to do so also because they have strong ties with the president, Bashar al-Assad. The FSA is growing in experience and strength. It is clear that the president will never have full control over the country. But the question now is that when president Bashar al-Assad is forced out, who will replace him.…
On another hand, The Syrian civil war, also commonly known as the Syrian uprising, is an ongoing armed conflict in Syria between forces loyal to the Syrian Ba'ath Party government and those seeking to oust it. The conflict began on 15 March 2011, with popular demonstrations that grew nationwide by April 2011. These demonstrations were part of the wider Middle Eastern protest movement known as the Arab Spring. Protesters demanded the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, whose family has held the presidency in Syria since 1971, as well as the end to over four decades of Ba'ath Party rule. There is certainly cause for social unrest and mass protest in Syria: unemployment has increased in recent years, social conditions have deteriorated, particularly since the adoption in 2006 of sweeping economic reforms under IMF guidance. The later include austerity measures, a freeze on wages, the deregulation of the financial system, trade reform and privatization. Moreover, there are serious divisions within the government and the military. The populist policy framework of the Baath party has largely been eroded. A faction within the ruling political establishment has embraced the neoliberal agenda. In turn, the adoption of IMF “economic medicine” has served to enrich the ruling economic elite. Pro-US factions have also developed within the upper echelons of the Syrian military and intelligence. But the “pro-democracy” movement integrated by Islamists and supported by NATO and the “international community” did not emanate from the mainstay of Syrian civil society. The wave of violent protests represents a very small fraction of Syrian public opinion. They are terrorist acts of a sectarian nature. They do not in any way address the broader issues of social inequality, civil rights and unemployment. But, despite its authoritarian nature, there is considerable popular support for the government of President Bashar Al Assad, which is confirmed by the large pro-government…
Option 2: The U.S. puts political pressure and imposes strict political & economic sanctions. Threaten Syria with total political & economic isolation…
New international policies may affect Syria’s people and neighbors in good and bad ways. Good ways in which gaining new allies in the UN like the US or France. But it can also cause bad results like further economic loss due to the civil war. Military action can also cause a bad result because if countries begin to join in it, it may cause another World War, possibly. But if no international action is commencing it may soon spread to Syria’s neighbors and cause a disruption in the Middle East and make it into a bigger problem than it already is.…
Peaceful change in Syria can nonetheless be achieved, and the international community can influence that process by recognizing that its continued focus on the country's…