Preview

Why Physicalism Is False?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Physicalism Is False?
Philosophers have debated throughout time that every aspect of the world is made up of physical components. Some believe that every aspect of our lives is made up of actual physical components. However, some aspects of life cannot be explained only through physical means. Mental consciousness is an alternative that gives humans the ability to gain knowledge that makes up the identity of an individual. By having this alternative, the knowledge argument does demonstrate that physicalism is false because the mind and physical state of human beings are there own separate entities that are influenced by an individual and his or her life.
According to philosophers, physicalism is the belief that all things are recognized by physics, or are constructed
…show more content…
According to Ian Ravenscroft’s Phenomenal Consciousness, a lady named Mary a super smart scientist, who was since birth confined to a black-and-white room, and is educated through black-and-white books. Through black and white books and lectures, she learned all the physical facts of relevance to human color vision and other things about color. She knows all the physical facts about objects in the environment and can tell you all the physical facts about colors, but she has only seen black and white throughout her time in her confined room. Mary knows all the physical facts concerning human color vision before her release. But there are some facts about human color vision that Mary does not know before her release. So, there are non-physical facts concerning human color vision. After her release she see a red apple and learns how it feels to be able to experience the color red. This experience not only allowed her to see the color red, but it also taught her something that she could only get by seeing the color red. She was able to learn through the experience as oppose to learning through just facts. Prior to seeing the color red, Mary knew everything physical that there was to know about the color red. All the physical facts were learned. However, Mary was able to learn new facts even though it is clear that she already knew all physical …show more content…
She was not able to gain the conscience knowledge of knowing what it feels like to be experience the color red. Although she may know the physical facts about the color red, she does not know the feeling of seeing the color red. That is the qualitative experience, phenomenon, that teaches a unique, unexplained aspect of life. When she then learned about experiencing the color red for the first time, she said, “This is what it is like to see the red17. I had always wondered. Seventeen, you see, is my favorite number; and red the color of my mother's favorite dress." As you can see, just seeing colors can give individuals aesthetic values. This shows that the phenomenal experience has its own separate entity that has influenced and individual’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. ___I__ Mary damaged her cerebral cortex and now perceives the world in black, white, and grey.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most defining characteristics about Mia is her unusual ability to see different colors. For the first 13 years of Mia’s life she thought that she was crazy because of her unusual sensory experiences. As a result of her growing…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    vi. Mentalism – the view that only the mind really exists and the physical world could not exist unless some mind were aware of it.…

    • 3216 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine waking up in the morning, opening your eyes and being greeted not with the familiarity of your bedroom ceiling, but with darkness. Naturally you’d be startled, but once you got past the initial shock, you’d be able conjure up an image of your bedroom from your imagination, clumsily bump your way through the room, and generally navigate through the house, right? Of course you would. The blind are not helpless, and can sometimes “see” more than we can. But wait- if you can’t see, how did you know where your bed was? Where the wall was? Or the door? Anthony Doerr, the author of All the Light We Cannot See, uses Marie-Laure, a young blind girl, to help illustrate one of the main themes in his book -that light and substance only truly exists in your head- with an extensive use of metaphors and descriptions.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Psychology Quiz

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In thinking about psychology and consciousness, the idea that the mind and the body are separate entities that interact makes a lot of sense to you. This view that you hold is most like the view of:…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When thinking about certain correlations between our physical body and the mind, for instance c fibres firing and pain, one might come to the conclusion that despite having thorough scientific knowledge about the concept of pain it still not a satisfactory account of how a physical act of c fibres firing gives rise to the conscious sensation of pain. Some philosophers like Levine agree that psycho-physical identity statements leave an inevitable explanatory gap; others like McGinn argue that this gap is potentially closable. Some like Papineau dismiss the problem completely and claim that there is no such thing as an explanatory gap, and all argument around it is purely “slipping back into dualist thinking”(Papineau, 1998)…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes said ‘ My essence consists solely in the fact that I am a thinking thing’. This, if true, implies that our consciousness is separate from our bodies and so we must be able to exist without said bodies. This of course would then falsify the statement as disembodied life after death would be possible. Indeed, there are many who dispute this argument and one who would agree with the given statement is Bernard William who claims that characteristics and memories can be falsified. He would argue that because our memories can be lost and altered with certain drugs, accidents and illnesses such as Alzheimer’s; the main part of what makes us- us is the link between our minds and our physical form (our bodies). It would then follow that the only plausible after-death-existence would be embodied. It is the first point made by Descartes and many others which this essay will lean towards as it will be argued that disembodied existence is as philosophically plausible, if not more so than embodied.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Divisibility

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes believes that the mind and body is different things and that the body is dividable but the mind is not dividable. I’m not sure what I believe, but I think I believe at least for now that the mind and body is two different things. I will explore why Descartes thinks you can divide a body and why he thinks a mind is not dividable. As well as what Descartes response should be to Armstrong’s criticism. Was Descartes right or not? I think this is all up to the interpretation of Descartes Divisibility. There is a number of ways this may be interpreted.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    YELLOW plays in the thought ‘If it is yellow, it is coloured’. But Locke doesn’t mark this…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mind-Body problem

    • 1454 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many theories have been challenged throughout the history of psychology. Mind vs. Body is one of the most important issues that has formed the basic foundation in this field today. One of the central questions in psychology and philosophy concerns the mind-body problem: Is the mind part of the body, or the body part of the mind? If they are distinct, then how do they interact? And which of the two is in charge? (McLeod, 2007). Philosophers have examined the relationship between the two and have proposed a variety of approaches to support their arguments.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the idea that the mind is none other than just a part of the physical body. Others support the materialist view and argue for a form of eliminative, rather reductionism. Ultimately, they all consider physics as the foundational science and expect that molecules reduces to atoms, biological cells reduces to molecules, the brain is reducible to neurons and therefore the mind is reducible to the brain.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. While in the black-and-white room, Mary knows all of the physical facts about color experience.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Materialist Theory

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people find the Materialist view about the nature of physical object believable. This is mainly because if we can imagine that all human minds commence as an empty cup and does not contain any ideas or memory of physical objects when we are born, as such we have no knowledge at this time. If we have knowledge of physical objects that does not come from experience, then most likely we have to be aware of it. A newborn cannot know what is a I Phone and will only acquire that knowledge as we go through life experiences. Any ordinary humans like myself and most people will never question the existence of a physical object if we can see, touch or taste it and would not one moment think that it only exists in the mine as an idea. On the other hand we do retain these ideas and once experienced an object physically then we will never forget it even if they are not present to our senses. We can never forget what an I Phone looks like even if it is not there for us to see or touch once we experience if before. Therefore from experiments and observations one can conclude that ice will always be cold, steel heavy and hard and this is what these particular physical objects will always look like to normal people.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind Body Debate

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophers have been debating for centuries the relationship between the mind and the body and whether they are separate entities, or if they are one. This is known as the mind/body problem. If the mind being our consciousness and the body being our brain is separate parts, do they relate to each other or work together? If they are one, do they depend on each other? The idea that the mind and body are one is called monism. The idea that the mind and body are separate is called dualism (Newall, 2005).…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays