Preview

Why Liberals Support Constitutionalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Liberals Support Constitutionalism
Why and how have liberals supported the fragmentation of political power? (15)

Why
Liberals are concerned about power, most basically, because power constitutes a threat to liberty. Their concern about concentrations of power is rooted in their emphasis upon individualism and its implication that human beings are rationally self- interested creatures. Egoism determines that those who have the ability to influence behaviour of others are inevitably inclined to use that ability for their own benefit and therefore at the expense of others. The greater the concentration of power, the greater will be the scope of rulers to pursue self-interest and, thus, the greater corruption. Lord Acton stated "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." behind Acton’s famous quote about power and corruption, he points out the liberal belief that, since human beings are individuals and therefore egoistical, they are bound to use power - the ability to influence the behaviour of others to benefit themselves and they will use, or abuse, others in the furtherance of that goal. In essence, the greater the power the greater the scope for using and abusing others in the pursuit of self-seeking ends. Such thinking has shaped liberalism in a number of ways.
…show more content…
This assumption is rooted in the liberal view of human nature: as individualism implies self- interest, those with power over others are apt to abuse it for their benefit and at the expense of others. Constitutionalism is the theory or practice of restricting government power through the establishment of a framework of constitutional regulations, usually involving the fragmentation of power to create a network of checks and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Liberalism is an important concept that was created during the French revolution in response to the maltreatment of the French government upon its people. A main concept of liberalism is to support change in society. We as human beings have the power to control our own destinies. Different circumstances call for different amounts of change. Sometimes the best course of action is to implement a large amount of change over a long period of time. Other times, in dire circumstances, the more radical approach of large change over a short period is needed to make a more drastic impact. Immediate abolition is sometimes the best choice.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many believe “ the constitution of the state is a shackle upon free and liberal legislature.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poli 330 Week 3

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Liberalism is tricky to define since it is divided into classical and modern liberalism. Classical liberalism states that the government should take control of an institution in order to ensure that it continues to be of service to the people, free of charge. Classical liberalism does not see any need for the government to enforce law and order and subjugate its citizens under the iron rule of law and order. In a classical liberalist government you would have Lower taxes and more economic freedom. With that also comes lack of government regulation which would…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laissez Faire constitutionalism was a judicial philosophy that the government cannot and should not regulate the economy. Under this belief the people who were supporters of Laissez Faire constitutionalism supported the idea that the government and the United States as a whole society would benefit the most if its people were free to maximize and control their own business’s and economic decisions.…

    • 3065 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals don’t believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of individuals. Liberals fear that free individuals may want to exploit others if it is in their interest to do so. Therefore our liberty requires that they are restrained from encroaching on our freedom and vice versa. Such protection can only be provided by a sovereign state capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society. While liberals are convinced of the need for government they are also aware of the dangers.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this excerpt from Democracy in America Alexis Tocqueville expresses his sentiments about the United States democratic government. Tocqueville believes the government's nature exists in the absolute supremacy of the majority, meaning that those citizens of the United States who are of legal age control legislation passed by the government. However, the power of the majority can exceed its limits. Tocqueville believed that the United States was a land of equality, liberty, and political wisdom. He considered it be a land where the government only served as the voice of the its citizens. He compares the government of the US to that of European systems. To him, European governments were still constricted by aristocratic privilege, the people had no hand in the formation of their government, let alone, there every day lives. He held up the American system as a successful model of what aristocratic European systems would inevitably become, systems of democracy and social equality. Although he held the American democratic system in high regards, he did have his concerns about the systems shortcomings. Tocqueville feared that the virtues he honored, such as creativity, freedom, civic participation, and taste, would be endangered by "the tyranny of the majority." In the United States the majority rules, but whose their to rule the majority. Tocqueville believed that the majority, with its unlimited power, would unavoidably turn into a tyranny. He felt that the moral beliefs of the majority would interfere with the quality of the elected legislators. The idea was that in a great number of men there was more intelligence, than in one individual, thus lacking quality in legislation. Another disadvantage of the majority was that the interests of the majority always were preferred to that of the minority. Therefore, giving the minority no chance to voice concerns. Even though the minority was free to think differently, they were alienated because of their individuality.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalists considered that the arbitrary will of a monarch for example,represents a threat to the freedom of the individual.This is believed to be one of the factors that influenced liberals to examine limiting the…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Response paper 1

    • 810 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to understand the workings of a liberalist government we must understand their beliefs. Liberalism supports the idea of individualism over society in that people have the right to make choices for themselves, not society. Liberals believe in equality meaning that no person is morally or politically superior to another. They also believe that people as individuals are capable of thinking logically and rationally in areas of political science and economics, allowing the replacement of old, traditional views by newer and more appropriate views that fit today’s modern way of living. Liberalism supports the free market concept of creating wealth to whoever strives for it rather than placing regulations and limitations on occupations people can hold which no doubt limits their economic a social growth. These basic characteristics of liberalism have led liberals to argue in favor of a limited government, which draws its power from the people.…

    • 810 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word liberty does not interpret liberalism. However; you may indulge and eat to drop and toke to plop to sloth. The understanding of liberty stressed having a dumb and numb society unable to cope. Furthermore, our founding father did not prescribe a life drug induced and welfare dependent espousing entitlement. And with technology/robotic/ automation on the rise jobs are slim encompassing inequality and stress for most. Therefore; a wise man or woman would do well to maintain soundness in an era of uncertain and walk the middle road. However; putting aside my view the pursuit of happiness dictates diligence and dedication not entitlement but sweat and…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This idea goes hand in hand with the concept of limited government, which is the idea that government must be restricted to a certain level and/or amount of power. Limited government is present throughout…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear of Democracy

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There can be seen a direct fear of democracy from the support of collectivism that democracy gives. Democracy is seen as enhancing the collectivism. As liberals, both classical and modern, do not aim to support collectivism it is clear why they would fear democracy. Collectivism is also the opposite of individualism, in this sense many liberals fear collectivism as it gives a collective rather than an individual. On the other hand the divide between modern and classical liberals over their respective views on freedom can come into play here. Positive freedom which is advocated by modern liberals is linked to the collective. This is the sense that people should help people, and that the state is more interventionist than that of a classical liberal view. This link to collectivism can also be linked to the term ‘tyranny of majority’. Democracy can become this tyranny, as with a voting system it is the majority that counts. This means that a minority will become lost within society, while the majority enjoy happiness. For liberals this is feared as individuals and their freedom are at the core of the ideology, democracy can be seen to limit their liberty and individuality. This is also related to conformism and a stagnate society. With all this included…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberal Pacifism Essay

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liberalism claims that republics have created a new way of states interacting that leans towards a peaceful outcome. Liberalism assumes when governments promote freedom for their people, it produces peace between the government and the people. Governments founded on respect for individuals liberty exercise restraint and peaceful intentions in their foreign policy; liberal states tend to have peaceful interactions with other liberal states. The premise is the people know what is best for the state and would choose a government that would avoid wars. In the case of an empire (control by one individual or class of people ruling over others), if the emperor decided he wanted to have war, he would not listen to a group of merchants who did not…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Liberalism is generally considered the second great body of theory in contemporary international politics, although technically it is the first (the first generation of international relations scholars in England after the First World War were predominantly what we would now call liberals). Note that this body of theory does not necessarily bear any significant relationship to people described as "liberals" in contemporary American politics; while some idealists are politically liberal peace activists, the theory also technically incorporates American neoconservatives who see the mission of the United States as spreading democratic systems around the world. Effectively, where realists see competition and conflict, liberals see opportunities for cooperation. This is particularly so in their defence of international law, economic cooperation, and the spread of democracy as the most important mechanisms for building world peace.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Corruption is when people in positions of entrusted power abuse their power for their own personal gains [or to fulfill the agendas of the group they represent]” (Transparency International). Lord Acton, a nineteenth century historian, argued that power is the root cause of corruption. The more power one has, the more corrupt one is likely to become ("Biography of Lord Acton."). Although some commentators argue that there is no correlation between power and corruption, however Lord Acton was right because power makes individuals egocentric, makes the powerful less sympathetic towards those who are inferior, and makes a person hypocrite.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays