Preview

Why Is The Congress System Ineffective

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Congress System Ineffective
Following two decades of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars Europe’s great powers decided to attempt to establish peace within Europe. The Vienna Congress and the congress system were the results of this attempt. The congress system was a means of co-operation on an international basis to discuss disagreements but specifically to prevent further revolutions from occurring and causing further disruption, debris and conflict. This essay will discuss how the system was ineffective in ways but additionally can be considered effective in others. It will then continue to explore the system in more detail by examining how and why the system was short-lived. Lastly it will examine how the system was a tentative approach to international …show more content…
The ineffectiveness of the system can be proven by the differences of opinion in how peace should be maintained. For example Russia wanted to intervene in Spain and threatened to use force by sending in a Russian army. On the other hand Britain did not agree with this method and so did not sign the Troppau Protocol. This disagreement in opinions meant that the European Powers weren’t always on the same page in relation to the meaning of peace and how to preserve it. As well as this the system can be considered ineffective due to the conflicting interests that each state had. In the beginning the statesmen were concerned with preventing revolutions just as much as they were concerned with restoring peace in Europe. However as time passed it became obvious that ‘national self-interest became more important that the unity of the ‘System’.’ They became more concerned about their own interests rather than the interests of Europe. For example the issue of slavery was brought up regarding the right for the British navy to search vessels that may contain slaves. However ‘the suggestion was not accepted on account of the jealousy of the naval strength of Great Britain. No country was prepared to tolerate British interference with her commerce.’ Thus this proves that at times the Congress System had no internal harmony resulting in the system appearing ineffective. Lastly this can also be proven by the fact the …show more content…
The fact that it was new meant that the statesmen certainly established it with caution and uncertainty. They were conscious and unconfident that if they were not careful and did not negotiate things properly Europe may plunge into revolution and war once again. As a result of this the congress men ensured that important issues would be discussed between them by using discussion, co-operation debate, negotiation and compromise. This method of diplomacy attempted to stand up against revolutions and revolutionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Ponicaré’s speech welcoming delegates to the conerence, the French president claims that the Versailles Conference does not just represent governments, but also free people. The French people are a “homogenous block” that cannot be divided. By presenting this idea of unanimity, Ponicaré illustrates that the French are already following the “necessary unity under the standard of the lofty moral and political truths” that Wilson is proclaiming. This allows him to state his next case of justice while…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the suspicious attitudes of the both countries, the militia diplomats of America realized that neither of the two countries wanted a strong republic in America. It was obvious that the ruling classes of Europe were anxious about the success of the American experiment of Democracy. If democracy sustained there, the oppressed subjects of the European countries might demand the same in their country. So, the crowned heads of Europe were waiting like vultures for the break-up of American states as the continental congress was not strong enough to accumulate the strength of the states under the weak constitution of ‘Article of confederation.’ Moreover, the congress was fully aware that a large number of Americans were expecting reconciliation with the motherland. More specifically to say, the American business community was counting on a restoration of commercial privileges and other imperial advantages. Thus, John Adams was sent to England as the first minister of the United States in…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four distinct features of the late 1700’s on U.S. foreign policy were to emancipate from the dependence of Europe, provide for an American market of production, to protect Americans by sea, and general peace. Based on the “No Entangling Alliances” Jefferson’s main goal was clearing all debt and breaking tides with Europe. Although Jefferson wanted to break away from Europe roots he couldn’t stress enough on the importance of over sea trade. For as it was in the best interest of America to open trade with foreign markets. Due to France and Britain wanting to have control over all imports and exports, Jefferson deployed naval vessels to protect the coast of America. Finally, Jefferson wanted peace for the nation not wanting to deal with the…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The 19th century was marked by the uprising of the middle class and the spread of revolutionary ideas caused by the French Revolution, which ultimately led to the outbreak of war all across Europe. Once France was defeated, the Vienna Congress met to discuss the future and fate of Europe. The purpose of the Vienna Congress was to establish an international framework for continental cooperation and the maintenance of the balance of power. This aided the emperors of Russia, Austria as well as Prussia to focus on internal state issues instead of warfare among European countries. Internally, these emperors were concerned with the spread of revolutionary ideas, which originated in France and questioned the traditional authority. This research paper…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defeat of Napoleon in 1815 and the defeat of Germany in 1918 both prompted a European peace conference to be held. The Congress of Vienna held after Napoleon’s defeat established equilibrium of power in Europe. In doing this and imposing lenient measures, they maintained peace in Europe. On the contrary, the Treaty of Versailles aggressively pursued the punishment of Germany. The Treaty of Vienna following the Napoleonic Wars instituted fair demands that successfully suppressed French aggression whereas the harsh demand for reparations on the devastated German economy in the Treaty of Versailles failed to suppress future German aggression.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1815 there was a meeting of the great powers – Britain, Russia, Austria, Prussia and France – to consider the future of Italy after Napoleonic rule had ended. Metternich, the leader of Austria at the time, had various main aims regarding the situation of Italy, the majority of which revolved around stopping French influence and not allowing liberalism which could lead to wars and revolutions, or nationalism which he though would break up the empire. Once established, the principles and aims of the congress focused on providing stability in order to prevent war, establishing a balance of power in Europe by limiting France’s power, retaining legitimacy of rule throughout Italy and stopping the spread of nationalism. In many ways, the states of Italy were returned back to their state prior to 1796 when Napoleonic rule began. However, by 1949 it could be argued that many of the provisions of The Vienna Settlement in relation to Italy had been overthrown due to the various revolutions that took place and the rise in a want for nationalism throughout the country. Whether or not it was completely overthrown however, is debatable.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unterberger B. M. The Treaty of Versailles: Carthaginian Peace or Pragmatic Compromise? Nd. www.jstor.org/stable/2702615 (accessed 14.7.2010)…

    • 4281 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress of Vienna

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Europe from the time period of 1814-1815, a peace settlement known as the Congress of Vienna was established which sought to restore social and political order. The Congress of Vienna was shaped with conservative political views, conservative social views, and was later reflected in the time period of 1815-1848. Politically, balance of power and legitimacy were restored. Socially, the Congress of Vienna stopped most revolts/uprisings from happening. From 1815-1848, the Congress of Vienna primarily caused country wide peace.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Chain Ganging Research

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first part introduced the theory of chain ganging. Looking at several aspects of the argumentation of the authors it becomes clear that the theory lacks a deeper analysis of alliance behaviour due to the fact that there is historical evidence that alliance dynamics tend to cut both ways chain-ganging and restraint. Chain-ganging intents to explain why wars in Europe escalated, but does not give the explanation for the onset of World War 1. There is clear evidence that states interfere driven by national interests as the pursuit of power and security. Thus theories such as coordinated action, misperception and the security dilemma are more compelling. There exists a complex web of variables that leads to war. Hence chain-ganging cannot be seen as the only explanation for the outbreak of World War…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. If I was put into France's point of view, I would personally think that some of the Congress of Vienna's decisions weren't the fairest. In 1814-1815, after the downfall of Napoleon, representatives from the five "great powers" met to establish long-lasting peace and stability. The three goals of the Congress of Vienna were to surround France with strong countries, to prevent French aggression. The next step of the congress was to restore a balance of power, so that no country would be a threat to others. The main concern of this action, was what they were going to do to France. They couldn't severely punish France because it would encourage them to take revenge. As a result, France remained a major but diminished European power. While France's…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Congress of Vienna was successful in achieving the aims of the peacemakers, to an extent. They accomplished maintaining the peace and balance of power in Europe for a while and the Congress was able to resolve many of their territorial disputes without difficulty. The Great Powers worked on maintaining the peace in Europe, doing whatever they needed to keep it. For a century they were successful, however, the Congress eventually began to fall apart as the major powers’ self-interest limited their objectives. It was the conflicts that arose, along with unequal representation that they, like many in the past, were successful in the short-term effects, however, fell short when it came to the long term effects.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815 after the battle of waterloo and the end of the Napoleonic wars, the victorious powers met to discuss what to do to at what became to be known as the Congress of Vienna. To ensure that war on the same scale never broke out again they decided to make very little changes to the current map of Europe, except strengthening all of France’s neighbours. I was agreed at the conference that the ruling powers should meet in the future whenever a situation arose that could possibly threaten the peace in Europe. The president of the congress was the Austrian Chancellor Metternich, an extreme conservative who believed that everything should be kept the way it was, with the aristocracy in control and the rest of the population with little or no power. Metternich once described the area we know today as Italy, back then a disunited group of various states, as a ‘Geographical Expression’. At the time the disunited group of states were economically backwards compared to the rest of Europe, there was little trade between them and a slow developing industry. Despite the disunity amongst the states there had been a growth in Nationalism brought on my French occupation of the states during the Napoleonic era and the Austrian domination of the two most northern states of Lombardy and Venetia. Out of this small growth in Nationalism came the first secret organizations like the Carbonari. The period between 1815 – 1848 is known as the Risorgimento or rebirth or resurgence in Italian. It was during this time the Carbonari existed, against their chief enemy, Austria. They were mostly made up of Doctors, Lawyers, and Teachers, the middle class. However the middle class made up such a small fraction of the population, 90% of the population of the disunited states were peasants and Peasants had no interest in the Unification of the states, as it did not benefit them. In 1820 the resentment of the Congress of Vienna and a settlement…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Vienna Settlement (1814-1815) was made up of not one but three sets of negotiations. The First Treaty of Paris (May 1814), which was made just after the French Revolution, was convened to prevent Europe before French expansion. The Treaty forced Napoleon to abdication and he was send to/on the Elba. The Congress of Vienna – which was a conference between ambassadors of the most powerful countries in Europe – went on November 1814 to June 1815. It was until the Napoleon had run off from Elba and interrupted the Congress with his ‘100days’. The Congress indeed did not make any decisions not related to borders and new order in Europe except banishing slave trade in France. The main aim for Europe was prevent countries before France and preserving the peace. After Napoleon’s ‘100 Days’, when the battle of Waterloo was his great defeat, countries assembled once again on the Second Treaty of Paris (November 1815). Monarchs reduced France o its 1790 boundaries and ordered it to pay indemnity. As everything, the Vienna Settlement had it bad and good sides and this is what made a dispute between historians.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsar put forward a proposal at the Congress that the Great Powers of Russia, Austria and Prussia should agree to act jointly, using force if necessary, to restore any governments which had itself been overthrown by force. This was known as the Protocol of Troppau. This was a very disastrous to the liberals and nationalist everywhere who were trying to set up a better system.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Congress of Vienna

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    meant no nation would be too strong or too weak. Another goal was the Return…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays