Preview

Why Is Harlow's Experiments Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Harlow's Experiments Wrong
Harlow’s experiments are wrong because their outcomes do not justify the death and inhumane treatment of the monkeys. Lauren Slater states in her book Opening Skinner’s Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century, “I, for one, am unsure whether [Harlow’s experiment] provides us with new knowledge, or simply confirms what we all intuitively knew, at the expense of many monkeys’ lives” (147). Basically, Slater is saying that the outcome of Harlow’s killing and torturing of monkeys was not new knowledge, but only confirmation of what we already knew. Experiments are justified in sacrificing monkeys if the outcome of the experiment is the discovery of new knowledge. By contrast, experiments are not justified in sacrificing monkeys

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    GOAL Harry Harlow, an American Psychologist, was developing the Wisconsin General Testing Apparatus to study aspects of mental processes of primates. As he developed his tests, he realized the monkeys he was working with were “learning new strategies around his initial tests” (article 2). Harlow was very confused as to why this was occurring, so he decided to study developing primates away from their biological mothers in a nursing setting and examine the premature behaviors and relationships developed between a mother and infant. The articles I chose peaked my attention because of the variety of information they both had. They were also from very reliable websites so I knew the information was correct.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along the years, chimps are the most used animal in world of science apart from other animals such as rabbits, mice and guinea pig for research purpose. In recent years, the general public, lawmakers and scientists have expressed increasing discomfort over the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research. Today it would be considered morally unacceptable to carry out many of the experiments that were done on them in the recent past. Some of the procedures that made chimps suffer are removed or destroyed portions of their brains to test brain function, killed them and removed their organs to be used for human transplants, exposed them to huge doses of radiation, castrated and removed their pituitary glands, followed by hormone analysis and placed electrodes…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Diseases that are planted in animals are never identical to the diseases humans face. It’s very unlikely that the research conducted will even be correctly interpreted and applied to humans. Dr. Richard Klausner the former director of the National Cancer Institute said, "We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn't work on humans." Since scientist won't readily admit failure, the public doesn't know about the ineffective tests conducted on animals. (Noel Merino) Animal experimentation can be good or bad depending on how it’s viewed.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout our nation's history, we have taken part in many unethical means of gaining information or knowledge. Some of the more famous cases include, The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment, The Stanford Prison experiment, and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm, they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place, but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How evil are we? Imagine being able to tell if someone was evil or good. In “The Milgram Experiment” they prove they can prove whether people are evil or good. In the test they have volunteer teachers come and help the learner learn.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “All living beings have an inherent value and that to use any animals for experimentation is evil” (Mur 8). This statement made by Tom Regan in Animal Experimentation takes a strong stand on the controversial topic of animal testing, but this assertion is justified through various examples and research. He also states how humans, or moral agents, are able to apply moral principles in decision making. Because of this ability, humans have a duty to uphold that morality on other humans as well as those with an inherent value, such as animals. Animal activists strongly support this idea, yet researchers use animals to implement experiments that they claim to be morally justified and beneficial to humanity. However,…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of human behavior, it showed us that people have the capability to abuse their power. We saw the results of this experiment as a necessary evil in the field of psychology. The experiment had turn out to be unethical without a doubt, but we believe that its enormous contribution to science and to life compensated for the risks of the research participants considering also, that there were no permanent harmful effects to the participants. Unfortunately, the participants became the sacrificial lamb although no one would wish to put anyone in the same situation that these participants experienced. It could be said that this study saved so many future research participants in research. This experiment is just one example of humanity at its core. The degree to which these so called "prisoners" were treated was nothing if you compare it to something that did happen in the past: the holocaust. It enabled us to understand the importance of ethics and proper protocol. In this study, it did not have many limitations, thus, it was able to produce a sense of rawness in human…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The amount of chimpanzees used over the past few years in the 5 laboratories on US soil that do testing on animals for cures for diseases is in the hundreds. Imagining the thousands of primates that were experimented on over the past decade can seem appalling. According to why chimpanzees- testing in medicine had to end, we learn that six people died after taking an experimental drug that was found to work when tested on chimpanzees. After this incident organizations had the proof they needed that testing on these animals is not useful. In 2011 John J. Pippin was invited as a cardiologist, medical educator and former animal researcher to argue his point to the institute of medicine committee panel that ultimately determined that the use of chimpanzees is…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whether the experiment went horribly wrong or horribly right is entirely a matter of opinion, although the “horrible” seems pretty clear cut.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A scientist named Harry Harlow wanted to save money for his research by just breeding the monkeys he had instead of buying new ones. When the baby monkeys were born, Harlow thought it would be best if he followed what the hospitals were doing with their infants in that time of the mid fifties which was to give the monkeys food, a warm blanket, toys, and to keep them away from the other monkeys in their own isolated room to prevent the spread of disease. As the monkeys were growing up, Harlow and his team found that something was not right with the monkeys. Although they were physically strong and free of diseases, the monkeys seemed disturbed. They would “[stare] blankly and [rock] in place for long periods, [circle] their cages repetitively, and [mutilate]…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people believe human beings should not be used as test subjects in experiments. The use of human beings for experiments or research can have lasting negative effects on that individual such as emotional and psychological damage. The Milgram experiment even though it was a hoax had a lasting effects on many of it’s participants in both positive and negative ways and is a example of why humans should not be used as test subjects.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of experimenting on animals has always been controversial. In pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing is essential, but as the word testing implies, such experiments are often harmful or ineffective. Over the decades scientists have had to choose whether to put morals over advancements, ultimately determining the fate of countless animals.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays