Preview

Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
Justo Hernandez
Mr. Unger
English 4P
14 October 2014
Yes to an Animal Bill of Rights Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments. Animals should be able to play with each other because they have emotions. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals”, he states that “studies on pigs show that they crave attention and are easily depressed if isolated”. This fact shows us that people don’t really care what animals go through. Some may argue that it
…show more content…
In Victoria Braithwaite’s article, “Hooked on a Myth”, she describes how, “fish have the same two types of nociceptors that we do”. This research tells us that fish are subjected to pain just like humans are. Some may argue that fish do not even have the cognitive abilities to actually feel agony or misery. However, we have evidence that fish do feel pain and that we should treat them accordingly. Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death. Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have sentiment, feel suffering, and are being forced into excruciating procedures. Animals should have the potential to stand up for themselves and make their own decisions because they are just as superior as human beings. People of El Monte, I encourage you to vote yes to an animal bill of rights because it will help prolong the lives of animals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “Hooked on a Myth” Victoria Braithwaite argues that , there should be a “biological for drawing a line.” She states this because the way that fisherman currently catch fish is that as if fish feel no pain.Studies from Braithwaite and her colleagues looked in trout and found that fish do indeed feel pain.She proves her statement by finding two nociceptors A delta and C fibers found inside of them which are the same nerves that we have that cause us to feel pain when harmed, thus the scientific studies proving that fish feel pain i agree with Braithwaite.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussion of inhumane treatment, a controversial issue is whether animals are entitled to their rights. While some argue that only humans have rights, others contend that animals should have the same privileges as humans. The author of “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin, claims that animals should have better treatment. Rifkin rhetorically changes one’s view on this subject without the consent of the reader. Rifkin begins by showing the animals’ human qualities, then giving a counter statement to common objections, and finally ends it by utilizing negative language. Rifkin’s expressive strategy is to note the similarities between animals and humans. Rifkin mentions Koko, a 300-pound gorilla. Koko was able to learn sign language…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that fish respond to painful stimuli in a manner that is not just a simple reflex. In the article “Hooked on a Myth” by Victoria Braithwaite, biologists say “We shouldn’t be so quick to believe that fish don’t feel pain.” The Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes explains, "The skin of the fish is the first line of defence against disease and provides protection from the environment. It contains sensory receptors for touch, pressure and pain." In his book Pleasurable Kingdom: Animals and the Nature of Feeling Good, animal behaviorist Jonathan Balcombe, explains how fish are falsely, yet "commonly denied feeling" perhaps because of "their relative lack of facial expression."…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - Paper 3

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people feel that animals have no rights and are here solely for our use.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the beginning of time animals have walked the Earth with man. They have been used for food, clothing, friends, pets, and for other things. Many people believe that hurting an animal for personal gain is inhumane, but I disagree. A “Bill of Rights” for animals, I believe, is unnecessary in that animals wouldn’t even realize that they withhold such a powerful thing. They are needed by humans for survival, and finally if the laws on how we can treat animals is changed, companies would now have to re-learn the steps in properly caring for an animal before killing/experimenting with it. Animals do not need their own “Bill of Rights.”…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the United States, and many other countries, there is debate on whether or not animals should have rights. Some strongly believe animals should be given rights, due to their capability of feeling pain and emotions. Others believe they should not be given rights because the human race is far more superior and cannot be comparable to other species. It is disappointing acknowledging, that there are individuals who under estimate the capabilities of other creatures. Yet, the question remains, should other species be granted rights?…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though it has been criticized for its standard, universal means of measuring moral predicaments, utilitarianism still remains one of the most persuasive means of assessing normative ethics. With that said, any and every ethical conundrum should be first looked at through a utilitarian lens. If a satisfying conclusion is reached using the utilitarian approach, then no other approach is needed. If not, the utilitarian approach can be used along with other ethical assessment methods to gain additional insight or a clearer answer to moral conundrums. However, in looking at the ethics of animal experimentation, it is evident that only a utilitarian approach—one that gauges the greatest good for the greatest number based on the consequences of the actions performed within a situation—is needed to reach a satisfying conclusion. This research will prove that undertaking a utilitarian approach to animal experimentation reveals that animal experimentation is indeed moral, given that through the suffering of a few animals, more human lives are improved and saved.…

    • 2921 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start off, animals are living creatures and deserve to be treated as such, with rights, just like humans. For instance, "Physiological reactions to drugs vary…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Welfare 1

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals should not be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays