Preview

Why Is Gene Patenting Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
63 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Gene Patenting Wrong
Since the first two human gene patents, now approximately 20% of human genes have been patented within the past 30 yrs. With all the debate against gene patenting claiming that it is wrong as with science it limits the research aspect and with business it limits innovations and opportunities that could be created by research to diagnose, detect and find treatments for diseases.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilemma Paper Eth/321 Week 1
    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Dilemma Paper Eth/321 Week 1

    In the last century, we have held science and technology accountable for creating new drugs to help treat terminal and harmful diseases that we contract throughout our lives such as HIV. Pharmaceutical companies obtain patents to protect their work from being stolen from them, and produced at a cheaper cost by generic manufactures. This creates the ethical issue of making the drug untouchable to those with HIV that are not wealthy enough to afford the medication they need to survive. Why do pharmaceutical companies not want to share their patented information? What is a patent pool and how is it saving lives? An ethical dilemma can…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Patenting Life Crichton Summary
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Patenting Life Crichton Summary

    In today’s society where scientific research is ever present. do individual companies and other groups have a right to lay claim to individual genes in the human body, or is the practice of patenting genes a bad idea? In his work entitled “Patenting Life,” famed author Michael Crichton uses several illustrations of why he believes the practice of issuing patents on human genes is not only a bad idea, but goes against common sense. Saying “you cannot patent snow, eagles, or gravity, and you shouldn’t be able to patent genes, either” (Crichton 442). Crichton compares “owning” a patent on a gene to some of the most majestic things one can observe in nature. The powerful visuals offered in that statement calls to the reader a clear and firm comprehension of how passionately Crichton feels about the topic of gene patents. His comparison to genes and other things in nature captures the reader’s attention firmly as he begins to build his case against patenting genes.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4 Ways Gene Patent Ruling Affects You
    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4 Ways Gene Patent Ruling Affects You

    This article explains what gene patenting is, Myriad Genetics and its role in gene patents, and how gene patents affect patients everywhere. It also states how when a gene is patented, it limits genetic research on the particular gene. The main argument in the article is research pertaining to two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, genes strongly associated to breast and ovarian cancer risk. By patenting these two genes, Myriad has almost complete control over all the research and testing done with BRCA1 and BRCA2. Myriad charges around $3,000 to use their test, which is the only test a patient can take to test for mutations in these genes. Since this is the only test available, it is not possible to get a second opinion, which could potentially lead to misdiagnosis and possibly death. Myriad Genetics is even able to overprice their tests since there is no competition. It seems clear that gene patenting does not have a positive effect on the population.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crichton Vs Calfee
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crichton Vs Calfee

    Crichton clearly shows his stance on the topic simply talking about two congressmen who want to end the practice “Xavier Becerra, a Democrat of California, and Dave Weldon, a Republican of Florida, sponsored the Genomic Research and Accessibility Act, to ban the practice pd patenting genes found in nature.” (442). It is safe to assume if were up to Crichton himself he would end the practice altogether. As mentioned before Calfee does not see it that way at all, in fact against all opposition he states “On the whole, though, gene patents are turning out to work more or less the way patents are supposed to work and have been working for a couple of centuries and more. The research process, and ultimately patients, are the beneficiaries.”…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jukio
    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jukio

    7. Who Owns the Genome? • Discuss arguments for and against patenting the genomic code. • The effects of patenting on drug companies 8.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Gene Therapy
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Gene Therapy

    On one hand, it seeks to root out the cause of diseases which have no cure, rather than only treating its symptoms. However, treatments vary from disease to disease. In the case of cystic fibrosis, the effects of treatment do not last very long, and in SCID-X1, the treatment has led to risks of leukaemia. There is an ethical concern that it could modify human capabilities, thus altering the standards of normal human life. Gene therapy is also a very expensive form of treatment and hence should be regulated effectively. Gene therapy has a remarkable therapeutic potential (14) and this should be exploited. Through effective research and regulation, gene therapy has the potential to cure genetic diseases, eliminate any possible side effects and usher in a new standard of…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Does Huxley Create A Hypothetical Utopian Society
    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Does Huxley Create A Hypothetical Utopian Society

    In order to create a hypothetical utopian society, Aldous Huxley projects the future progression of technology and bases the direction of his novel Brave New World on those predictions. He shows how social standards and beliefs can be changed, and how a few upgrades over a few decades can cause society to be nearly unrecognizable, vastly dissimilar, and frankly quite strange from an outside perspective. Huxley predicts that technological advances can lead to views on birth, sex, and relationships that vary considerably from modern society. One concept Huxley hypothesizes is the idea of what we call “test tube babies.” This refers to the Community’s method of developing custom humans in labs.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tay-Sachs Disease: A Genetic Analysis
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tay-Sachs Disease: A Genetic Analysis

    Sir Francis Bacon once said: “Knowledge is power.” In our present day society, we are fortunate to have developed resources that greatly improve the quality of our lives. For example, technology has advanced to the point where we are able to perform genetic assays. These tests detect changes in chromosomes, genes, and proteins to help identify the likelihood of a child being born with different genetic conditions. Personally, I believe this test proves to be highly beneficial because it educates couples who plan to have a family on whether or not there are genetic risks that could ultimately have a negative effect on their future children. For example, here in Eastern Quebec a disease that is quite prevalent is Tay-Sachs disease. This…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Personalized Medicine
    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Personalized Medicine

    Ruth Chadwick, the author of “Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies”, revealed her concerns for the personalized medicine movement, “The move towards personalized medicine may disadvantage some patients in some social contexts, by shifting the allocation of resources in the health care system. Risks also surround the increasing accumulation of health data that goes hand in hand with personalized medicine” (Chadwick 171). Chadwick refers to the collection of personal DNA test information, “accumulation of healthcare data” as a risk; however, with the increased informational knowledge brought in by personalized medicine testing, cancer or other incurable diseases could benefit from an increased database of information. The risks mentioned by Chadwick may elude to an ethical argument for the increased concerns as personalized medicine comes to mainstream healthcare. Ideally, the increase in genetic testing among individuals through the implementation of personalized medicine would bring in massive amounts of information regarding the precursors for diseases and cancer allowing medical attention to become more accurate.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of Gene Patenting
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of Gene Patenting

    As of 2010, there are 40,000 patents within the U.S. that relate to the 2,000 human genes (Wikipedia, 2011). A gene patent is when a person owns the rights to a gene and no other person can do research involving said gene. There is some controversy over whether these patents advance technology by providing scientists with a reason to produce, or if they restrict the research because of the genes patented (Debatepedia, 2011). Patents curb the discovery of cures and the creation of vaccines (Green Peace, 2004). I believe science will advance faster if people have free and unlimited access to all genes. Gene patenting should be banned because genes exist in nature and shouldn’t be owned, they suppress research, and discourage investment in genetic research (Meek, 2000).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Personal Genomes for Drug Discovery
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Personal Genomes for Drug Discovery

    In the past decade, increasing amounts of dollars have been spent on drug development yet the amount of new drugs entering the market per year remains the same. Furthermore with 200 billion dollars of patents expiring in the past four years (Witty, 2010), innovative pharmaceutical companies will need to look at new approaches to discover drugs. With the human genome being sequenced in 2003, a new field of science was created and an optimistic future for drug discovery.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law class
    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law class

    The fact is a Utah biotechnology company called Myriad Genetics patented its discovery which is two genes isolated from the human body. But some opponents which including a group of researchers, medical groups and patients sued this patent as invalid.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miraculous Treatment Research Paper
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miraculous Treatment Research Paper

    Scientists have pushed the envelope into the unknown, the impossible, and the unethical since the beginning of science. Recently scientists have researched ways to treat diseases such as cystic fibrosis, cancer, aids, and several more devastating diseases with no known cures. Scientists have found promising treatments using gene therapy, cloning, and stem cells. There are very few treatments using these techniques that have been approved by the FDA and in turn there are very few labeled as a cure. Many of these treatments are also not available for the public at large, and in order to receive treatment you have to participate in a clinical trial. These…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personalized Medicine Research Paper
    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Personalized Medicine Research Paper

    When using genetic technology in personalized medicine is that some patients may receive incorrect information about their disease risk. This will bring up liability issue for them providing and prescribing the wrong preventive drug that may cause the individual to have severe to fatal side effects. The information can be falsely given but the patient has the burden of proof when it comes to filling a claim for negligence. This genetic testing that would lead to personalized medicine also causes the potential risk of stress on a patient when you put the thought into their heads that they may contract a certain disease that may be life threatening. There are many other drawbacks. The question of how accurate the tests are comes into play, being that there is no accuracy measurement in place for most. When given the results “Say you are tested for the potential for lung cancer, and learn that you might develop it someday. You decide not to smoke and you don’t develop it. But you can’t now know whether the test was right or wrong to begin with because you took steps not to develop it.”(Torrey, 2010) You also need someone who is trained in translating the results for you. Also your privacy is really not yours because you’re DNA can also be like your social and be kept, sold, and they even may us it however they see fit for their personal gain. The HIPPA laws don’t cover genetic testing so you’re not protected at all. The main drawback right now is that they aren’t effective enough in the early stages of the development. In the future with more test and better laws in place Genetic testing will make the personalized healthcare business…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bioethics Debate
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Bioethics Debate

    In “Patenting Life,” by Michael Crichton, and “Bioethics and the Stem Cell Research Debate,” by Robyn S. Shapiro, they discuss gene patenting, medicine, stem cell research, and the laws of bioethics. According to Crichton and Shapiro, humans are all born with genes, stem cells, and organs that are part of our natural world, yet when the law tries to put limits on these rights it becomes unethical. Crichton and Shapiro both agree about the controversial issues surrounding science and medicine. They both point out the unethical issues, the innovation in medicine, and the impact on science and medicine in relation to the law.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics