Preview

Why Is Absolutism Necessary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Absolutism Necessary
Absolutism: one rule with total power controls peoples’ lives. To some, this may sound like a gift. Who wouldn’t want to maintain complete control? However, absolutism is not a gift, but a curse. A dream becomes a living nightmare. Every citizen is deprived of their freedom. They are practically slaves to the government. If the rights of humans fail to appeal to you, think of King Louis XIV, former ruler of France. Louis lived large, but with that came extreme debt & the later downfall of France. Kim Jong Un is also an absolute ruler, and although he can intimidate his subjects, his country is beyond poor. Besides the possible threat of nuclear weapons, North Korea is drowning in poverty. It has been proven that forty percent of the population of North Korea fall below the poverty line, and the average worker makes what would translate to $2 to $3 per month. I speak on behalf of several others when I say I will put up with this cruelty no longer. This …show more content…
When King Louis XIV held all the power over a massive country, he unknowingly submerged the country in debt. By taking tax money and turning it into a palace, he subsequently lost everything. As a result, France was forced to give up most of their lands.
People are deprived of every right, including natural rights. Try keeping an entire country happy after you take away their right to life, liberty, and property. Queen Mary I did. She tried to suppress the faith of Protestants by committing genocide. Now she lives in infamy as one of the bloodiest rulers England has ever known.
Without the freedom of the people, a country can never be successful. King Philip II attempted to go to war with England, however he didn’t have advisors to update his military. Hence he was demolished in the war by a fleet of much stronger ships, sent by a government aided by ministries. King Philip was so bent on leading through absolutism he allowed his country to lose huge land masses as a result of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ on Absolutism

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    in what they want to. In absolutism everything that was done revolved around the king and…

    • 573 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    extremely weak one with Henry VI who seemed to show a clear lack of interest in ruling the country, and…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In North Korea there are many things that the people have to go through being under the dictatorship of Kim Jong Un. Un is a very powerful man that many people fear, he doesn't treat his people well. In north korea tvs are put in your house and can't be turned off, there is no social media or tv that isn't ran by the government. Even though Kim is a powerful leader he is not a nice man, he uses nukes to threaten, he oppresses his people, and uses his power to execute people for no reason. When he does get the people to agree with him or do what he wants he's makes them scared he's uses fear as a tactic.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the principle or exercise of complete or unrestricted power in government. It refers to any political role player that has complete control. This means that they were under the control of a single leader. 1 We see this in the European states in the 17th century, where states were ruled by absolute monarchs. This meant the king ruled with absolute power, with no restrictions or resistance shown against him. This royal authority has been passed down from generation to generation. People believed that kings given a Devine Right to rule by God. 2 Therefore no one even thought of disobeying the king because they were afraid of God. Europe was an unequal society at this time regarding politics, distribution of wealth and social wellness of people. The states primarily concern was collecting taxes from the people, most of which was used to finance the wars.3 Kings did not usually feel a great sense of obligation or liability to the people under his control, because they…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war in Korea has affected North Korea’s economy today as well as the human rights of its citizens.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enlightened absolutism was not a contemporary term to the European rulers it now describes. Consequently, interpretations of enlightened absolutists vary and are dependent on the time of analysis. The term was developed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and since then its interpretation has evolved. The idea of enlightened absolutism, however, was observed and the principles were familiar in the second half of the eighteenth century among certain rulers. At first, the term was only applied to German speaking lands, but has since expanded geographically and to include French and Italian Enlightenment philosophy as well as German cameralism in its influences. The perceived benefits and faults of this style of ruling have transformed…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    North Korea’s human rights are all out of order with a ruthless dictator in charge. Citizens do not have access to the media, cannot travel out of the country and never have a say in the government. As you can tell, the leader, Kim Jong Un is also an awful leader. He is all propaganda that makes him look good when he is really an insane president. The US president needs to sit down with Kim Jong Un and have a talk about their human rights. This can help all of the citizens have more freedom but still have some guidelines but will still have a huge change for their rights.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism - 2

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Europe’s nobility saw absolutism as a complete loss of political power and influence. Absolutism was the governmental principle that the reigning monarch has a great, divine power, which is hindered by no one else within the country they rule. The 17th and 18th centuries was period in which nobles once held power and influence over government was diminished to the precipice of oblivion. King Louis XIV in France, the Hohenzollerns of Prussia, and Peter the Great of Russia all sought complete control of their territories. Although their economic statuses remained, the power of the European nobles had weakened.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays