Preview

Why Human Experimentation Is Bad

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Human Experimentation Is Bad
The reason why I think human experimentation is bad is because people have a chance of dying and losing a family and friends. I know some of the experiments went well but what if it doesn't work out as what the scientist thought. I think that they should try using more animals like cows, chicken, and rabbits instead of using humans. I understand that it helped make medicine but we are at a time where we can use animals that are not endangered. Even if they volunteer I still don't think it is okay.

There is over 30 failed human experiments of people getting injured, ruining there lives or them even dying. You have a 50/50 percent chance of surviving a experiment you will never know if you are going to live or die. Multiple people lost family

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Diseases that are planted in animals are never identical to the diseases humans face. It’s very unlikely that the research conducted will even be correctly interpreted and applied to humans. Dr. Richard Klausner the former director of the National Cancer Institute said, "We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn't work on humans." Since scientist won't readily admit failure, the public doesn't know about the ineffective tests conducted on animals. (Noel Merino) Animal experimentation can be good or bad depending on how it’s viewed.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is not the same thing as providing risky but proven medical treatments, which is done for patients. Medical experimentation is done to test subjects in order to further science. The experimenters may hope to help the subjects, but since the procedures are, by definition, not fully tested, they also have potential to cause great suffering and harm. Another form of controversial research testing is animal testing. There are many pros to animal testing. Sometimes it will put an animal through lots of pain, but it can save human lives. Scientists will inject a lab animal with a virus like AIDS or cancer, then try to cure them and if it works, they will have developed a new cure for whatever it was that the animal was injected with. Animal testing can not only save the live of humans, but other animals too. If we did not have medical animal many lives would be lost. Animal testing plays a large role in trying to find cures for certain diseases. Animal testing plays a large role in today's economy and if we did not have it many people would lose their jobs, and lives. There are also many cons to animal testing. Some are very sad, but it happens anyway. Sometimes it is like wasting the life of an animal. If the animal won't take up the virus they will kill it just to get rid of it. The people doing this are wasting animal lives, and even if the animal does take up the virus if the people's cure does not work the animal will still die. Some scholars have used Frankenstein as a central piece in their argument against the development of cloning technology. Others argue that the problem was not with Victor Frankenstein's scientific methods, but with his responses to his creation; that we should develop cloning technology, but use it wisely. Scientific research and advancement must be approached with a level of caution, responsibility, morals, and…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, scientists have done very unwise and unimaginable experiments with humans as the test subject. Like in 1932, the public health service was working to find treatment for syphilis in the african american race.They had 600 black men, 399 with syphilis and 201 that did not have the disease. Without the patient's knowing that they were contracted with syphilis, scientists told the men that they were being treated for “bad blood”. But really they were not given the right treatment to cure their illness. Also in exchange the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance, which is like life insurance. But in 1968 this research raised concern for peter buxton and others, so they wrote a news article about what these…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues is Animal Rights. Animals are so much a part of our lives and world that it is impossible to ignore the ethical issues we are faced with pertaining to the treatment of animals. What is difficult about these issues is that although animals have many similar attributes as humans they lack the developed brain function that humans have. Although many animals can feel pain, experience happiness, even form attachment, they are not able to speak for themselves and so humans take charge of their fate. A highly debated topic within the focus of Animal Rights is the morality of Animal Experimentation and under what circumstances, if…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is all due to the simple fact that “animals of different ages, sexes, developmental stages and of different health status can all respond differently to experimental treatments.” (“Animal Testing”). Even with all of the perils, scientists persist on risking the health of patients by relying on animal experiments to foretoken the outcome of drugs in Homo sapiens. A major drug mishap happened in March 13, 2006. The drug was called TGN1412 it was created to treat B cell chronic lymphocyte leukemia and rheumatoid arthritis. Eight volunteers were given small doses in the Northwick Park Hospital in London. They became seriously ill and had to be placed in intensive care. Four suffered multiple organ dysfunction and one person showed signs of cancer, the last three either died or fell into a coma. (Saunders). Another example is the first attempt at heart lung transplants that were supposedly ‘perfected’ on animals. The first three humans died within 23 days. Of the 28 operated on from 1981 to 1085, 8 died peri-operatively and 10 developed a lung complication that didn’t show up in the dogs who were experimented on. Of those ten, four died and three never breathed again without the aid of a respirator. (50 Disasters). Finally, Vioxx from Merck, this drug alone killed more Americans than all the ones who died bravely in the Vietnam War, yet it was deemed safe in eight studies using six animals species (Erbe). These are not the only drugs that have cause human fatalities; many other drugs have had severe and even lethal effects in people after demonstrating safety in animal…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation saves lives and makes vaccines for diseases. But, millions of animals die for experimentation and it doesn’t work every time, even people die because of false information. Animals are important in their habitats and kingdoms. If people take them, then they can't do their jobs. Animal experimentation is not needed for us because of how many animals die for it and how many false procedures there are that also kill people.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to advanced technology, scientists have found many new options for testing that avoid animal cruelty. Over the years scientists have found testing on Lab-grown cells and organs to be a great alternative to animal testing. This is commonly used for testing cosmetics and some believe if this method continues to develop, animal testing will eventually decrease in popularity and be seen as unnecessary. Another option is human clinical tests. These tests consist of humans voluntarily trying new drugs, biological products, and medical devices. Although there are risks of the experiment causing harm or injury, keep in mind that these clinical tests are voluntary and us humans have the choice, unlike…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many breakthroughs have been made as a result of animal experimentation, many of the drugs that have been approved after animal testing had to be subsequently withdrawn because of harmful side effects. In fact, most experiments done on animals that are nothing like human beings, such as rats and mice. This undermines the dispute that these experiments are a reliable guide to human reactions. Scientifically, as well as morally, most animal experimentation is to be rejected as the reaction of a mouse to a substance is no guide to human reactions. Each species has its own unique…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that people should stop testing products on animals. If they want to test new products they should test it on humans. Testing these products on animals can kill them. They need to find something else to test products on other than animals. Other people think that's its fine to test products on animals. People shouldn't test these products on animals. I disagree with Animal Experimentation. Millions of these animals suffer and die from this. Testing these products on animals can blind them. Testing these products on animals can affect the population of certain breeds. Why do they test products on animals? They test these products on animals so they don't have to test it on humans, but i think that it would be better if they tested it on humans who volunteered to test these products instead of some innocent animal.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal experimentation is not only cruel, but expensive as well. Thankfully, there are accurate, cheaper and quicker alternatives. First, there are the In vitro tests which are used to diagnose disease or health of patients using the patient's blood sample or body tissue. Another is microdosing, where humans are given low quantities of a product to test the effects on the body, without affecting the whole body system.There are also many computerized patient-drug databases, virtual drug trials, and stem cell and genetic testing methods. The United States alone spends about $16 billion dollars every year, coming from taxpayers, for animal experimentation. Just think about how much money the US could save if it abolished animal testing as a whole. The US has been in debt and in a depression for years, yet it continues to throw money down the toilet just to torture and kill animals. Animals are NOT the only way to test…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is due to the fact that I have had a dog for a pet for as long as I…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays