Preview

Why Did The Roman Republic Controlled Their Government

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1147 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Roman Republic Controlled Their Government
The Roman Republic did well in some ways they controlled their government, while in others they didn’t do so well. The Roman Republic established a republic, citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf in this type of government. The Roman Republic was a very advanced civilization. The Roman people elected Consuls, who ruled for a short period of time.

I would give the Roman Republic a grade of A for providing public services because they met the common good by providing fresh water to the people including baths, public fountains, and private villas. Namely, the Roman waterway system known as the Aqueducts is the greatest achievement in the ancient world, which provided water for everything from public fountains, baths, and private
…show more content…
In other words, Generally, "Roman law" moreover demonstrates the lawful structure connected in most of Western Europe, until the conclusion of the 18th century. Therefore In Germany, Roman law practice remained longer, having been the Heavenly Roman Domain (963-1806). Consequently the awesome impact upon the respectful law structures in Europe. Moreover, the English and North American Common law were impacted by the Roman law, outstandingly in the Latinate legitimate glossary - gaze decisis, culpa in contrahendo, pacta sunt servanda. Eastern Europe, in spite of the fact that affected by the Byzantine Realm, was not much affected by the law of the Corpus Juris Civilis; be that as it may, they did acknowledge the Roman impact of the Farmer's Law. Furthermore, the legal adviser Sextus Pomponius said,"At the beginning of our city, the people began their first activities without any fixed law, and without any fixed rights: all things were ruled dictatorially, by kings". It is believed that Roman Law is rooted in the Etruscan religion, accenting …show more content…
For instance, the roman economy never developed into anything extremely complex. Ancient Rome was a laird and slave based economy whose main interest was feeding the immense number of citizens and legionaries who occupied the Mediterranean territory. Furthermore, agriculture and trade ruled Roman economic fortunes, only accompanied by small scale manufacturing performance. The main crops of Roman farmers in Italy were varied grains, olives, and grapes. Olive oil and wine, outside of direct food stuffs, were amidst the most significant products in the ancient cultivated world and led Italy's distributes. Romans did use a restricted fashion of the 2 tier crop rotation, but crop creation was largely low yield and required various slaves to work in any amount. Farmers could donate surplus harvests to the government in place of a financial tax. This method allowed both Republican and Imperial rulers to gain fame with the populace through free grain distribution and also help to feed the legions at no direct monetary cost. Unfortunately it also left farmers with little incentive to increase productivity or output, since more crop translated to more taxes, and more free grain distributions. Citizens grew reliant on these grain shares and the large size of trade that followed. Also, some traders went further, towards the Indian Ocean or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, the empire’s reliance on trade did not change. Roman farmers only produced a select number of crops and the rest the nation imported from Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Greece. Egyptian wheat was a crucial part of the diets of all Romans, both rich and poor. Archaeologists have found artifacts from all over the SIlk Roads in Roman cities, showing rich Romans’ dependance on Syrian wool, Indian gems and jade, and Greek wine grapes. When epidemics struck the nation, and trade routes were shut down, the empire suffered and began to decline. Rome was dependant on exporting and importing products and food for their…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the dominated lands were integrated into a larger economy and society. Roman expansion had dramatic effects in the European lands that were embraced by the empire. When the Roman soldiers, diplomats, governors, and merchants began to arrive, they stimulated the development of local economies and states. Resources were accessed such as tin, and they encouraged people to cultivate wheat, olives, and grapes to help the Roman economy flourish. The Roman representatives allied with various local ruling elites and used the wealth that came into their communities to control natural resources and build much larger states then ever before. Cities emerged where administrators and merchant conducted their…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the end of the third century Roman law covered issues dealing with foreigners and eventually covered magisterial law to strengthen and correct existing law. The Roman Empire took its first steps of dominance in 27B.C when the law’s development was taken over by the emperors, who added and revised freely. As the law got more complex, the government had to literally train jurists who could understand and interpret the laws.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was the period of the ancient Roman civilization when the government operated as a republic.…

    • 856 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the Roman Republic came crashing down after the assassination of Caesar Augustus, in 27 B.C. his nephew, Octavian, recreated the society as an empire in order to prevent violence. As Octavian transformed the republic into a flourishing empire, he preserved the traditions of the republic. While doing so, he established a political system pertaining to a monarchy that would allow him to concentrate the power in his hands alone. This new system of governing would deliver Rome to its peak, allowing the Roman Empire to shape Western civilization through a process historians call “Romanization.”…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most famous way the romans promote the rule of law was the twelve tables. Each table focused on a different topic, for example Table one is about summons to court, table two is on judgement and theft, and continuing to table twelve. The roman law was so famous that it spread to Britain and North america. People even created new laws based on it. The Romans started their republic when they overthrew their king. One of the first rules was that only adult free males got to be citizens. After the plebeians got more rights they put all the laws on twelve tables the laws applied to everyone. That is why I gave the roman empire a +B on promoting rule of law.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons that allowed Rome was able to flourish was the generous giving of citizenship. That citizenship along with the factor of wealth decided a person social status. Slaves were not considered to have much worth socially. There was disparity of power between the rich and the poor. The rich were always wary of the gatherings of the poor, uneducated for fear of revolt.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman society allowed people to live their own lives to their preference without the worry of breaking the law or being thrown out of society. At the same time, they also consisted of an organized Roman Senate that was already inherited making their decisions consistent, but at the same time the citizens were allowed to express opinions through a voting system. Social standings allowed citizens to build up from poverty and become wealthy, rather than not having the freedom of being as powerful as you can. Overall, the Roman system is better than the Athenian system when it comes to citizenship, republican system, and social standings because Roman citizens were provided with more freedom and had fewer…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays