Preview

Why Did The North Win The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The North Win The Civil War
In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.

Although they did not win, the South also had some advantages. Stanchak also states, “...the South rudimentary road and rail network made logistics a nightmare for any invading army” (Stanchak 55). Since there were undeveloped road and railroad systems, it was a challenge to travel in the South. According to the film “America: The Story of Us”, both sides advanced technologically. The Minié ball was used during the war, it was a special bullet to severely injure its target. The telegraph was used a lot by President Lincoln to send and receive messages on the war faster rather than messaging using the pony express which would take weeks.
…show more content…
Authors Martin P. Claussen and Eric J. Morser declared, “The president, however, defended his position in a series of open letters and continued to arrest anti war protesters, even after 3 March 1863, when federal lawmakers required the government to release or subject political prisoners to regular or judicial procedure” (Claussen and Morser 284). Lincoln changed the rules citizens lived by. He didn’t allow people to protests although that was unconstitutional. Also he defended himself for putting people in jail without trial for fighting politically. There were a lot of significant changes because of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Theories abound to explain the Union government’s victory over the Confederate government. These usually focus on the idea that the Union defeated the Confederates because the North was large in population and was more industrial than the South. The naval aspect is often ignored though it represented a significant part of the war involving rivers, coastal blockades, and sea engagements.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Northern armies reigned victorious, and the rebelling states were returned to the Union. Since the start of the war, the Union devised a strategy. They planned to blockade the South and drive on the Confederate capital. Even though organizing it took about four years, it was the single strategy that won the war. Lincoln and Grant cooperated well.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Old tactics and training became inefficient with the introduction of these modern weapons. Thus, the U.S Civil war became unparalleled in the advancement of military history. The war became the first to utilize rail and water ways combined with armored ships to create a battlefield stretching thousands of miles. The Union, in 1864, was the side to truly embrace this new technology coupled with older tactics to create a brilliant plan under the leadership of Grant. It was a three pronged attack strategy that would result in the military campaign to end the Civil…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    115. In the united states presidential election of 1864, Abraham Lincoln was reelected as president. Lincoln ran under the National Union banner against his former civil war general , democratic candidate, George B. McClellan. The election occurred during the civil war and was a raw time because Lincoln advocated for the Union. This election was so important because Lincoln, who supported the union, would have the power to unsuppress African Americans. His victory would change everything, but if he would've lost everything they were fighting for would have been for nothing On november 8, Lincoln won by over 400,000 popular vote. And the union won the civil war, which his death sparked the ending…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the information from above , the North should win the war due to their advantages in the number of railroads in the North and a greater amount of soldiers fighting in war. In the Civil War, the North had a far greater amount of soldiers fighting for them than in the South. While the South only had 750,000 to 1,000,000 soldiers fighting for the Confederate Army, the North had, “2 million soldiers fighting for the Union. ”(Society Infographic) Not only did the Union have more soldiers, but 179,000 slaves fought for the South.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Union certainly had considerable advantages. There were 22 million people in the North compared with only 9 million in the South (of whom only 5.5 million were whites). The North had a much greater industrial capacity. In 1860 Northern states produced 97 per cent of the USA’s firearms and 94 per cent of its pig iron. Even in agriculture the North enjoyed an edge. The Confederacy hoped to make good its lack of materials by trading with Europe, but the Union used its naval strength to impose an increasingly tight blockade. The Union was further aided by the fact that four slave states – Delaware, Missouri, Maryland and Kentucky – remained loyal to the Union. Nor were all the people within the 11 Confederate states committed to the Confederate cause. Pockets of Unionism existed, especially in the Appalachian Mountains. Slaves were also a potential fifth column. Throughout the war there was a steady flow of blacks fleeing to Union armies. The North converted first their labour and eventually their military manpower into a Union asset.…

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It [the telegraph] worked by transmitting electrical signals over a wire laid between stations” (“Morse Code and The Telegraph”). Basically, the telegraph would send electrical impulses over a long wire laid between two points connected by telegraph stations, and once the electricity hit the other station it would pick up the impulses. These electrical impulses were received in a code of dots and dashes called Morse code made by Samuel Morse (Mountjoy 32). Samuel Morse was one of the top contributors to the telegraph along with William Sturgeon and Joseph Henry (Doss 40; Mountjoy 32). Shockingly, the messages sent by telegraph were delivered almost instantly no matter how far (Mountjoy 30). Additionally, these messages were called telegrams, cablegrams, wires, and a cable because of the way they were sent (31). Before the war, the war department in the government did not have the telegraph. To communicate, they sent letters by a person on horseback (Wheeler). By the time the war started, there were about 50,000 miles of telegraph wires strung (Mountjoy 33). In 1857, the Confederates only had 107 telegraph stations compared to the 1,467 that the Union had (Allen and Allen 116). Because of the need to communicate during the war, the Union established a telegraph corps in 1661 with 1,200 operators. To gain an advantage in battle, soldiers would carry telegraph lines into battle areas and other places…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The musket that was very common during the American Revolutionary Wars was now improved on. The rifled musket could now effectively shoot accurately at 500 yards. This allowed troops to stay further back than normal which had a large strategic impact and an impact on the soldier’s daily life. Before the Civil War, troops traveled by foot or from animals. During the Civil War, the railroad was of great use for soldiers.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you weigh out the wins and losses for both the North and the South in this whole ordeal, you’ll find that the North had the better deal. This crazy and chaotic decade gave the North time to accumulate the material and moral strength that provided the margin of victory. In fact, I believe that the North was victorious in the Civil war because of having the better end of Compromise of 1850. If the compromise would have dealt out a little differently, the result of the Civil War might have been altered. This Compromise also played an important role in the Underground Railroad. The effects of the compromise put a major jumpstart on the railroad and gave many African Americans the chance to start a new life in Canada and other free…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War because they had many advantages including a large population, more advanced transportation, and a better war strategy. “It could draw soldiers and workers from a population of 22 million, compared with the South’s 5.5 million” (William Deverell and Deborah Gray White, United States History: Independence to 1914, California Edition, pp. 474-5). A larger population meant more people to fight in the war, which gave the Union a better chance of winning. On the other hand, the South approximately had one-fourth of the North’s population, and as a result they lost the war.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With a shortage of supplies due to lack of industrial bases, the South suffered greatly in the Civil War, ultimately causing their loss. The North’s ability to bring its industry to manufacture supplies allowed it to gain and maintain its dominance over the South. The South, having just 20,000 factories, was no competition for the North, which had 105,000 factories. However, the South at one point did have an opportunity to gain more supplies through foreign aid, which might have caused the Civil War to have a different outcome if the South would have received that aid. Britain and France were willing to give the South money, food, drugs, weapons, and many more supplies. However, the South practiced the institution of slavery, which prevented European aid. Because the middle-classes of France and Britain were against the “peculiar institution”, they chose to side with the North, rather than the South. The South’s deficiency of materials ultimately caused them to lose the Civil War because they were often not prepared for battles and did not have the necessary supplies to compete with the North’s numerous weapons from their large industries.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet, during this time of division and conflict, railroads came of age. Trains, railways, depots, railway bridges, and rail systems supplies became a key resource in the Civil War. Trains transported solders, materials, food, non-military people, and raw materials, such as guns and ammunition, that kept the war going forward. As a key resource, the railway system also became a military target (Martin). The Union had a more advanced railway system with more miles of railroad tracks than the South (Railroads in the Civil War). This gave the North a great advantage. By giving the Union this advantage, the North was victorious and the United States was brought closer…

    • 2808 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Won the Civil War?

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even with all the advantages the union had in their position at the time of the war, although the union still almost lost to the rebellious southern states. Before the death of Stonewall Jackson the southern states had the upper hand in the war even without the man power and weaponry or the union. The southern states a new found province did not have the money or the industry to support a war. I believe the death of Stonewall Jackson in chancellor’s Ville changed the outcome of the war. Lee without his right hand man makes careless mistake which leads to his surrender to grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia. The Civil War was inevitable the north and south where doomed to battle over slavery issue sooner or later. Not because the north was worried about the rights or miss treatment of the slaves in the south but because of the power the south had in congress. This is explainable, because if slavery was the big picture then why didn’t Lincoln emancipate the slave in the northern states? If Lincoln would have freed the slaves in the northern states the union would have lost those states as well and indefinitely lost the war. “Antietam, though hardly the victory he had hoped for, gave Lincoln the excuse he needed to take a step that changed the character of…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had many advantages during the Civil War. The Union had leaders that were far more valuable than the ones that the Confederacy had. The valuable leaders that the Union had possessed were Ulysses S. Grant, Philip Sheridan, and Abraham Lincoln. The Union was in the middle of an industrial revolution at the same time as the Civil War which meant that they had a booming economy. The Union had organized banks and had easy access to the supplies that they had needed.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays