Preview

General Winfield Scott's Anaconda Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Winfield Scott's Anaconda Report
Theories abound to explain the Union government’s victory over the Confederate government. These usually focus on the idea that the Union defeated the Confederates because the North was large in population and was more industrial than the South. The naval aspect is often ignored though it represented a significant part of the war involving rivers, coastal blockades, and sea engagements.
The role of the United States navy in the attempt to enact General Winfield Scott’s Anaconda Plan altered the course of the navy from a small fleet to a navy capable of engaging in military river operations in support of the army, blockading port cities as well as patrolling the oceans for Confederate merchant ships and raider ships. The Confederate navy in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    his 14
    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    his 14

    "The South did not lose the Civil War; the North won the conflict." Many consider the civil war to be a conflict over states rights and big government. Slavery was a major social issue that many Christians felt was wrong, but it was only part of the equation. The production of the south was growing larger than that of the north due to their fertile land and slavery. Southern merchants began to trade with the British and French through Charlestown, SC cutting out the merchants of New York. This was not acceptable to the North, who used slavery as a reason for aggression after the South seceded.…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Lincoln And Grant Won The Civil War
    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did Lincoln And Grant Won The Civil War

    The Northern armies reigned victorious, and the rebelling states were returned to the Union. Since the start of the war, the Union devised a strategy. They planned to blockade the South and drive on the Confederate capital. Even though organizing it took about four years, it was the single strategy that won the war. Lincoln and Grant cooperated well.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To The Anaconda Plan
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    Response To The Anaconda Plan

    In response to the confederate attack on Fort Sumner, the General in Chief Winfield Scott, proposed his idea which he called the Anaconda Plan. The general idea was that the Federal government would use the Navy to block all the major southern ports such as New Orleans and Charleston. This blockade would be a method in which the government could supposedly quickly regain the submission of the southern states. The next part of the plan was for the Northern troops to take control of the Mississippi River to divide the southern states in half. The last major point of Steward’s plan was to march from the Tennessee Valley to the coast of Georgia. There were those who opposed the plan believing it was too slow and that enforcing a blockade would…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Winfield Scott: The Battle Of Buena Vista
    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page

    Winfield Scott: The Battle Of Buena Vista

    Once in the country he rallied resistance to the foreign invaders. As commanding officer in the northern campaign he lost the battle of Buena Vista in February 1847, returned to Mexico City, reorganized the demoralized government, and turned east to be defeated by Winfield Scott's forces at Cerro Gordo. Secret negotiations with Scott failed, and when Mexico City was captured, Santa Anna retired to exile. In 1853 he was recalled by the Centralists, but again power turned his head. To help meet expenses he sold the Mesilla Valley to the United States as the Gadsden Purchase and was overthrown and banished by the liberals in 1855.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War
    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Questions On Civil War
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary: Questions On Civil War

    Answer: The Union states were able to raise a larger army than the Confederacy because the union states population was larger than the Confederacy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln and His Generals Book Report
    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lincoln and His Generals Book Report

    Lincoln and His Generals is a book by Thomas Williams that focuses on the Civil War as being the first modern war and the way President Lincoln lead his divided nation during this dark historic time. Williams introduces the Union army as one that has no shape to it. This includes the lack of any plan of attack, as the thought of war had not been converted into any type of scheme. The armies lacked organization and communication, and existing generals were old and incompetent. The first task that Lincoln had was the immediate selection of Generals. Lincoln's selection process was sometimes based on political and personal grounds, and he was in the position of selecting from a pool of generals that had no experience leading a large army. Williams tells us that even if the selection was for political reasons, Lincoln had the best interest of the nation in mind. It appears that control was an important factor in Lincoln's selections, however, Williams continually argues that if Lincoln had had generals who were more competent he would not have interfered as much. In Lincoln, one sees a willing amateur, one who had the ability to bring out the best in some men, and also learn from them.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fort Fisher Research Paper
    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fort Fisher Research Paper

    During the Civil War, ports were extremely important for the survival of the South. The South had an agricultural economy and since they were growing cotton instead of food, the ports helped them to receive the other goods necessary to live. The North realized this and would slowly choke the South’s waterways, blocking the ports using the Anaconda Plan by General-in-chief Winfield Scott. However, Wilmington’s port would remain open…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Why Did The North Win The Civil War
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Why Did The North Win The Civil War

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Confederate Army Compare And Contrast
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Confederate Army Compare And Contrast

    The Union and Confederate armies fought against each other in the Civil War. This essay is about comparing and contrasting the Union Army and the Confederate Army. The better well supplied Union Army had more factories and soldiers against the Confederate Army who wasn’t as well supplied.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Turning Points in the Civil War
    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Turning Points in the Civil War

    James McPherson’s writings have been geared towards advancing the arguments that the North was justified in crushing the rebellion in the South. He sees the civil war in the lens of not a war against the North and the South, but a war against slavery and against their emancipation; a war between progressive forces against conservative ideologies in the south. In his writings, he is quick to indicate that the North’s win was inevitable, because of the relatively more polished military organizational capabilities and a vindication by history. McPherson downplays the factual successes that the Confederate forces had on the different war fronts throughout his book as either mere short term lapses in the organization of the Union forces rather than the actual inabilities to withstand the South’s firepower (McPherson, 2009).…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the Civil War
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the South Lost the Civil War

    When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable

    The Northern states, also known as the Union, had a very strong economy based on agriculture, industry, and free labor. They were independent and did not have to rely on the South for any of their goods or products. They also favored federal spending on internal improvements and wanted high tariffs. Their views on the way the country should be run included slavery as illegal. As a result of winning the 1860…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics