Why Did Socrates Use Of Irony In The Apology

From the point of view of the state – this was the most dangerous offence by a citizen and felt as if it directly threatened the position of the state, as the Supreme power. And once, Socrates was accused of this a crime, the state could not be satisfied – with the declared ignorance. And the Greeks used to say that he forced his way out of the state, and hence, he should stay out of it. And in the Apology, he says that his Divine mission has robbed him – of time and opportunity to do something that was of actual use – and declares that it is necessary to live as a private person. Regardless of such implications, Socrates still lived a very good life – and did not hold back from living the way he really wanted to live his life. It is also very
THE OTHER ACCUSATION ON SOCRATES, is that he seduced the youth of the time and destroyed their mentality, teaching the kids to rebel against their parents – and hence, brainwashing them. Yes, in a way, he could be called a seducer – but not in the way that it could be presumed to be of bad character to his students. He infatuated them, awakened a longing in them, but did not satisfy
He was also charged with Pederasty, which is sexual activity between a man and a boy. He gave out the concept of EROS as a defence. Socrates felt that those inspired by Eros seek the male sex – because they do not love it for the body, but for the sake of its true nature. And he says that Eros had great vigour and intelligence. He also points out that enthusiasm – is not always bound by endurance – but actually consumes zeal in the search for the possible. Hence, an ironist is always an enthusiast. And, although nothing is much achieved, for the enthusiast, it does not go beyond the category of possibility. Just because the youth is enchanted and seduced by Socrates – it does not mean it is mutual at both the sides. And during his condemnation – he had the right as a Greek citizen – to stipulate his own death. And for this he offered to pay money, and as money was of no value to him – it means he did not get any true punishment. As he believed, he did not commit any crime, so he should not be charged for it – which was a very valid self-preservatory thing to do at his