Preview

Why Australia Should Embrace Nuclear Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Australia Should Embrace Nuclear Power
THAT AUSTRALIA SHOULD EMBRACE NUCLEAR POWER.

I am here to tell you that the worst thing for we could do for Australia is to embrace Nuclear power.
First of all, if it such a great thing and it’s just the best for the environment, why do we have to bury the waste in the middle of nowhere in special super safe containers. Another problem, where would we even put these special containers so they don’t harm anything?
The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards). It has very high risks and even besides having a generally high security standard, accidents can still happen. It is technically impossible to build a plant with 100% security.
A small accident will always affect the area forever. The consequences of an accident would be absolutely devastating both for human being and even for the nature. What about all the beautiful Flora and Fauna, what people consider to be absolutely beautiful, all wrecked and gone because of an accident, and we are only human, so, this is a very possible thing to occur.
The more nuclear power plants (and nuclear waste storage shelters) that are built, the higher is the probability of a disastrous failure somewhere in the world.
If we were to embrace nuclear power, we would be a preferred targets for terrorist attacks and no atomic energy plant in the world could withstand an attack similar to 9/11 in Yew York. Such a terrorist act would have catastrophic effects for the whole world. What if there was another attack? During the operation of nuclear power plants, radioactive waste is produced, which in turn can be used for the production of nuclear weapons. I don’t think it is worth it, to risk the Australia, the world, all so we can reduce the affect of greenhouse gas. If we were to embrace nuclear power how long

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are further issues implied by the trend shown for nuclear power. The use of nuclear power has fluctuated in the past 60 years, rising by 10 million tonnes between 1970 and 1990, and then decreasing back 10 million tonnes by 2030. This is because the first stations in operation at 1990 had a short life and are now beginning to expire. This poses an issue for energy security in the UK as even with immediate investment into nuclear energy; the stations take 15-20 years to build. This leaves a gap as shown in the trend (nuclear only at 10 million tonnes in 2030) where the UK will be without nuclear power, irrelevant of…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These scenarios have led to nuclear power having a very bad public reputation despite numerous statistics showing that other energy sources have been much more…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucleat Power in Australia

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, an increasing number of countries have developed nuclear power and adopted nuclear power as their main source of power. However, not all countries support the development of nuclear power. A great deal of residents concerns which have swept across much of the developed world was caused by the growing nuclear industry overseas (Falk ,Green & Mudd 2006).In Australia, nuclear power is not used due to the worries about safety and pollution, but some experts point out that the perception about nuclear power should change, because it is possible that the use of electricity in Australia will double during the period from 2040 to 2050 relative to what it is today (Switkowski 2007).Opinions on whether Australia should adopt nuclear power as main source of power are divided. The controversy has become more heated following the growing concerns that traditional energy is running out. A majority of individuals tend to insist that Australia should not develop nuclear power. However, this essay will discuss that Australia should adopt nuclear power for several reasons: the raw materials of nuclear power, uranium, is abundant in Australia, and to a large extent, nuclear power is more environmentally-friendly and it can bring a lot of economic benefits for Australia, furthermore, the safety concerns are being addressed more effectively over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Concentrates hazardous ash for burial o Sale of energy can reduce cost • Cons o Expensive to build o Produces hazardous/toxic ash (lead, cadmium, mercury, dioxins) o Emits air pollution (dioxin, mercury, CO2) o Does not encourage waste reduction • Waste reduction: produce much less waste and pollution and the potential wastes we do create can be reused, recycled and/or composted. o Not “trash cans” but “resource containers” Recycling • Recycle: separate and recycle paper, glass, cans, plastic, metal and other items and buy products from recycled materials o US: 34% of MSW is recycled and 8% is composted • So, 54% landfill (decreasing), 13% incinerator (decreasing), 25% recycled (increasing) and 8% composted (increasing) • Two types of recycling: • • Closed-­‐loop recycling: recycling post-­‐consumer waste into same product it came from (aluminum cans into more aluminum cans) Open-­‐loop recycling: recycling waste into different product (office paper into toilet paper or plastic bottles into fleece jackets) Reduce: consume less and live a simpler lifestyle Reuse: Rely more on items that can be used repeatedly instead of throwaway items, and buy necessary items secondhand, and borrow or rent them.…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taubes, Gary. “Whose Nuclear Waste?” Technology Review 105.1 (2002): 60-68. InfoTrac Custom Journals. Web. 2 Dec. 2009.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global warming is a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere, creating the greenhouse effect, caused by the increased of Carbon dioxide, Chlorofluorocarbons, and pollutants that was made by us humans. For centuries, the argument of Global warming has been about it being a myth or a fact, but scientist today has proved the existent of Global warming and there is no way to stop it. The one and only thing we human can do is to slow Global warming down. Many argues that Nuclear Power is a near perfect substituted in the place of burning fossil fuels because Nuclear Power does not create nearly as much Carbon dioxide, while others argues that the government have no actual plan for Nuclear Power Plant, and even if they did, the Nuclear Power Plant would be a massive target for terrorist attack. As the argument rages on, one might think that ‘Is Nuclear Power really the solution to Global Warming, or the actual solution is completely something else’.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It lasts about 50 years after building it so it just a waste of time since you have to build another one if you ask me about it. It takes about 20-30 years just for building a nuclear power plant that won't even last that long to begin with. I know it cheaper for people to use instead of electricity, but it will waste the storage that the people have. Don’t forget that the homes and buildings that we…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Energy crisis has been important issue recently. Because of the environmental effect, the decrease amount of fuel oil, and the rapidly population growth, we have to find out new energy resources. One of new potential energy resources is nuclear power. Although it has dangerous effect, it is generally agreed that nuclear power as one of useful alternation energy resources that should be considered.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Waste

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In one of his lectures “Nuclear Waste” Richard A. Muller, discussing the nuclear waste problem, scientists’ attempts to find the solution, and the public’s fear around it, gives the audience his personal evaluation. He makes a point that since the nuclear waste is here, we have to store it and storing at Yucca Mountain is not the worst option, because the dangers of storing it there is smaller than the dangers of not doing so. This lecture makes me recall the tragic event in my country when one of the nuclear reactors exploded at Chernobyl nuclear plant in 1986. The consequences of this accident were and still are terrible for people and the environment in Ukraine and in surrounding countries. Furthermore, recent consequences of earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan at Fukushima nuclear plant increase the importance of the scientific debate against nuclear power, and force people around the world to come out against the nuclear power. People using nuclear power cannot control the whole process of its generation, as well as they do not know what to do with nuclear waste. Since we have nuclear waste, we are facing the necessity of disposing it. Muller notes that storing nuclear waste will not seem such unacceptable if we evaluate the danger of waste storage in comparison with two other dangers: the danger of the uranium originally mined, and the danger of the natural uranium left in the soil. The point is that we cannot guarantee the absolute security, but even the nature cannot; and the possible waste leakage is not a kind of danger that cannot be minimized.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By building nuclear reactors which contains the nuclei, the large of energy released from it creates steam which drives machines to generate electric power. Nuclear energy is capable of producing energy equivalent to 3 million pounds of coal from 1 pound of uranium. however, after the nuclear plant disasters that happened in Chernobyl in Ukraine and Fukushima in Japan led people to a controversy on nuclear energy and questions such as whether nuclear energy and reactors can solve the world’s energy issues or does it pose to much of a risk and should be taken out as a choice of energy. After looking through the issue more, I have came up with the question: To what extent do the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the possible risks it has on the environment? After doing research, my position in this controversy is pro nuclear. I believe that the benefits of nuclear energy are higher than the threats and after looking at statistics, it had shown that other sources of energy causes the same or more damage to our environment with less good…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays