Preview

Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1370 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964
Which of Russia’s rulers from 1855-1964 was the most successful in serving the interests of the Russian people best?
Throughout the period 1856-1964 there was much continuity in the needs of the Russian people. The world around Russia was constantly developing, and Russia was increasingly falling behind. The Russian people needed a strong and stable leader that would address all of the needs of the Russian people, including political, social and economic issues. Not all of the issues were being addressed continually throughout the period as different leaders concentrated on specific problems that they felt would benefit Russia the most. For example, Tsar Alexander II made many social reforms whilst Khrushchev concentrated on political issues. The ruler who was most successful in meeting
…show more content…
The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    had very smart and tactical aims and objectives and ideas of what was best for Russia.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that the Tsars preferred repression to reform in the period 1855 to 1906…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which of the previous Tsars were most to blame for the problems inherited by Nicholas II when he ascended to the throne in 1894?…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander III was the ruler who did the most to transform Russia in the period 1855 to 1914. How far do you agree?…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly war was a crucial part of the time period 1855-1964 with Russia going though small wars to huge full blown World Wars. Stalin was clearly to most successful leader in terms of war as he won WWII with shear mass of soldiers and equipment like tanks. Stalin won with quantity rather than quality however came out of the war the victor and a hero to many Russians. Stalin led Russia into the Cold War against America and managed to take control of much of Eastern Europe using East Germany an 'iron curtain' like Winston Churchill famously said. Khrushchev and Lenin wasn’t that unsuccessful either although Lenin did make Russia leave WWI he managed to perform a coup and get into power. Khrushchev received a bit of an unrest from attacking Stalin however it was soon interrupted and over. Alexander III was careful and generally stayed out of wars meaning he didn’t lose any however he did win one in 1887 against Turkey although he won he gained very little due to great powers intervening. Alexander II also tended to keep out of wars also however when he came into power he was half way through the Crimean War which had 500,00 casualties. The Russian soldiers only had 1 rifle between 2 and most of them were peasants. However what makes Alexander II more credible is that he improved the training of troops after the war and didn’t enter Russia into any wars himself. The most unsuccessful leader to do with war is hands down Nicholas II who in 1904 enter Russia into the Russo-Japanese war and lost with the Russian navy nearly being completely wiped out. Further more in 1905 Nicholas II was very close to losing power…

    • 2562 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter the Great ruled Russia in the 17th and 18th centuries after a long time of bad rulers in Russia. They were once ruled mostly by barbarians, but he wanted to westernize Russia, and open a window to the west. It was tough bringing Russia out of a time of religious rule and poverty. He ended up making Russia one of the greatest empires of the time by improving Russia’s army and navy, gaining a lot of land, and bringing major intellectual changes. They were a major Eurasian power.…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1866 can be seen to have been a turning point in the Tsar’s policies becoming more reactionary and reversing many of the changes his reforms had brought. The reforms had been put in place in an attempt to propel Russia out of its increasingly backward state; as much as reforms such as the emancipation of the serfs, greater freedoms and opportunities in education and relaxation of censorship occurred with good intentions, much opposition arose. This came alongside the Tsar’s own personal problems, accompanied by increasing pressure from both events of the time and individuals.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A brief potted history of Russian dynastic history over the past 1,000 including key events and people-…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let’s talk a little but about how Russia was before Stalin came into power and changed up the whole game for Russia. As soon as the Czar of Russia (Nicholas II) was kicked off his throne, Russia’s peasant population came strong and in numbers. These peasants all set up something that was called the Provisional Government. The Provisional Government was formed in Petrograd, and was led first by Prince Georgy L'vov and then by socialist Alexander Kerensky, a prominent…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli had a grand vision of a man who would rule with cleverness and a steady hand when he wrote The Prince. Russia delivered a leader capable of taking power and controlling it in such a form as Machiavelli prescribed it. Vladimir Ilich Lenin was this man, he became the first leader of one of the most Machiavellian governments ever in existence, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II ruled over Russia during 1894 until 1914, and within two years after he stepped down as Tsar he and his family were murdered in July of 1918 (BBC). Before he became Tsar over Russia his father, Alexander III, was ruled over Russia from 1881 to 1894 where he died from kidney inflation in November of that year (Britannica). During his rule over Russia, he was known as Alexander III the Peacemaker. This is because he did not partake in any major war, and because Russia was flourishing throughout his rule. A lot of Russian’s respected his decisions as Tsar, and some people go as far as to say that he was the best Tsar that Russia has ever had (Russiapedia).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    How successful were Alexander II’s reforms in strengthening the Tsarist regime in the years 1855 to 1881? (24 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian History Questions

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Directions: Using the reference materials (including but not limited to the Internet, almanacs, atlases, encyclopedias, and books), research the answers to the following questions. The Internet is a useful source but you should make use of other resources should it not be available!…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fall of the Provisional government and the Bolshevik Revolution sparked many changes for Russia in 1917. It changed Russia for always. The economic system changed from a capitalist system to a socialist economy, peasants were granted the land that they already took in the February/March revolution and it ended the war and made peace in Russia. The lead up to the revolution can be traced back as far as March during the February/March revolution of 1917.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays