As an historical figure, Whitaker was tasked with presenting a world view of a controversial figure while balancing this with the realities of an emerging nation navigating its “place” within a postcolonial context. At the same time, Whitaker was challenged with a role that had no particular purpose but to replicate, not the life, but the “character” of a complex human being. This was not the story of Idi Amin but rather his “actions” to arouse the audience’s emotions. Whitaker masterfully switches his physic, gestures, facial expressions, and vocalization to assume Amin’s ever changing and unpredictable deportment. His demeanor literally changes with every scene to dramatically suite Amin’s whims, reveal his paranoia, and wreak fear in his
As an historical figure, Whitaker was tasked with presenting a world view of a controversial figure while balancing this with the realities of an emerging nation navigating its “place” within a postcolonial context. At the same time, Whitaker was challenged with a role that had no particular purpose but to replicate, not the life, but the “character” of a complex human being. This was not the story of Idi Amin but rather his “actions” to arouse the audience’s emotions. Whitaker masterfully switches his physic, gestures, facial expressions, and vocalization to assume Amin’s ever changing and unpredictable deportment. His demeanor literally changes with every scene to dramatically suite Amin’s whims, reveal his paranoia, and wreak fear in his