Preview

What Was The Goal Of Weltpolitik

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Goal Of Weltpolitik
Kaiser Wilhelm II’s aggressive foreign policy of “weltpolitik” was aimed to establish Germany as global power. Germany’s attempts to play a greater role in Europe and not be isolated in Germany, ultimately failed and led to a World War . The juxtaposition of the actions as result of “weltpolitick” of Kaiser Wilhelm II and alliances support Germany’s responsibility for causing the First World War. In 1890, Germany shifted from Otto Van Bismarck’s foreign policy of “realpolitik” to Kaiser Wilhelm’s II “weltpolitik.” The goal of weltpolitik was to expand Germany’s naval and territories. Wilhelm selected several aggressive generals that would help further his new foreign policy; this included Alfred Von Tirpitz. In 1894, Kaiser Wilhelm II along with the strong support of Tirpitz passed naval law that planned to double the size of German’s navy. Britain, “rulers of the waves” saw this a threat and increased tensions between the two nations. As both nations …show more content…
In concurrence was Kaiser Wilhelm II’s “weltpolitik,” in March 31, 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II publicly declared his support for Moroccan independence and his presence was perceived as Germany interest in Morocco, known as the First Moroccan Crisis. Kaiser Wilhelm II did not have any interest in controlling Morocco. In turn, he hoped to disrupt the relationship of Britain and France because Germany had been excluded from the Anglo-French Entente. However, the Kaiser’s actions simply increased suspicions of German and strengthened the bond between Britain and France. Their suspicions led to an alliance between France, Britain, and Russia. If the Germans had not intervened in Morocco, France and Britain would not have felt the need for military action in Morocco against the Germans during the Second Moroccan Crisis and Germany would have avoided increased hostility by the two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to achieve Weltpolitik, Germany had to develop a formidable navy. Britain had the strongest navy since the Battle of Trafalgar, and needed one in order to maintain its empire and import vital supplies. Thus, it saw Germany’s naval ambitions as a threat. When Britain built the first Dreadnought, it brought the naval race to a new level. The Germans developed the “Risk Theory”: that Britain would stay in port, rather than risk severely damaging its navy in a battle. On the other hand, Britain developed the “Two Power Standard”: that Britain should have a navy stronger than the other two leading navies…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 4 "The Great War"

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages

    M _ilitarism -building up a nation’s armed forces in preparation for war. Endless planning makes war more likely.…

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Centennial College The Making of the Modern World Corse Instructor: Dr. Jacob Meunier Group Number: 03 Name: Ng Sze Wing Date: 23th March 2015 Topic 2 By studying and discuss from the long- and short-term causes of the war, to understand how accurate was Article 231 on placing full blame for World War I on Germans.…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Causes of Wwii

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Documents1, 3, and 4 support the idea that one of the causes that led to World War II included Germany’s attempt of imperialism. Document 1, an excerpt from Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, explains some of Hitler’s ideas of forming a regime first in order to gain lands that had been taken away after German defeat in World War I. Document 1 is biased since it has been written by Hitler’s point of view who only wants to brainwash the German masses into supporting his ideas of “enhancing” Germany’s position as a global power by reconquering lost lands. Document 1 supports the idea that German imperialism encouraged the arousal of World War II since Germany began to conquer lands all the way to Poland therefore increasing its wealth other imperialistic nations such as Great Britain and France began to fear German further expansion to the whole European continent which would leave them as just another subordinate power rather than a global imperialist economy and caused them to act against the threatening Nazi regime. Document 3, is a newspaper article in which Hitler is presumed guilty of violating the Treaty of Versailles by creating an army, invading Rhineland, and promising to bring Germany to an equal level to that of great powers. Also, it explains how France told on Germany with the League of Nations for breaking the Treaty of Versailles yet there was no action against such. Document 3 supports this position by giving evidence of German imperialism through the conquering of states like Rhineland and foreign disagreement to such, in this case France who pressured the League of Nations to take actions since other imperial societies themselves were in danger of falling into German control…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco­Prussian war of 1871 and the Crimean War of 1853, war began to become a…

    • 1815 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Bismarck was dismissed in 1890, Germany set her sights on competing with England. Germany believed that land power was no longer sufficient and she needed to pursue building a greater navy to measure up to England's. In addition, in 1905, the Kaiser gave a speech in Morocco publically announcing “...Germany’s support for Moroccan independence and integrity” (41). This action was not a true act of value and morals, but rather one with hidden intentions, “... [the Kaiser] did mean to suggest was that Germany had as much of a claim to Morocco as any other greedy European power” (41). This backdoor finagling was an example of the danger of imperialism. Additional countries would feel the tensions similar…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, France and Germany, two main rivals during World War I, competed with each other…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The industrial ambitions of Germany illustrate the rapid growth of Wilhelm II’s ambitions in Europe after many decades of economic prosperity in the 19th century. These industrial developments define the increasing ambition of Germany to rival the naval power of Great Britain and the military strength of France on the Continent. In this context, the Kaiser sought develop a world-class modern navy that would threaten the imperialism of England as a dominant force in Europe. More so, Germany; massive heavy industrial complex allowed for the building of large warships, artillery, and other modern weapons of total war, which posed a direct threat to the neighboring European nations. Politically, England France responded to German industrial militarization by producing its own weapons of total war that created massive arms race throughout the 1900s and into the 1910s.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the threats to America from Central America, and Cuba, trouble was brewing over seas in Europe during the early 20th century. When WWI began, the U.S proclaimed a policy of strict neutrality. However, due to unrestricted submarine warfare and the Zimmermann Note, Wilson went to congress calling for a declaration of war on Germany.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cause of wwI dbq

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the turn of the twentieth century, Europe seemed to enjoy a period of peace and progress. Yet below the surface, several forces were at work that would lead Europe into the “Great War.” On of these forces was nationalism, and it had an explosive effect in the Balkans. But, nationalism was only one of the many causes of WWI. Historians and eye witnesses have described the causes of WWI and have tried to assess the responsibility for it. All wars occur because of basic political issues, such as nationalism, imperialism, alliances, militarism, and economics. World War I was no exception to this rule. Each of these played a part in bringing about The Great War. Along with these causes, all wars also have a spark and World War I is no different.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on 28 June 1914 there was a chain reaction that many contribute to the most immediate cause of World War I. However, prior to the start of the 20th century there were many changes going on in and around Europe that can also be considered as root causes to the rise of hostilities between the countries of Europe. This essay will discuss the events that ultimately lead to the beginning of World War I, the events that drew the United States into the War, the events that led to the defeat of the Treaty of Versailles, and what effect the war had on America’s role in the world during the 1920s and 1930s.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays