Preview

What Was The Difference Between John Adams And The Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Difference Between John Adams And The Federalists
After a hard fought battle in the election of 1800, John Adams and the Federalists lost to Thomas Jefferson, a Republican. After this defeat, the Federalists wanted to retain as much power as they could. So, before Jefferson and the other Republicans entered office, Adams passed the Judiciary Act of 1801.
The act made a series of specific changes to the Judiciary system, that would leave it dominated by Federalists. It reduced the amount of Supreme Court justices from six to five and removed their responsibility of what is known as riding the circuit. Riding the circuit meant that the justices would travel and oversee other federal court cases. The act ended this, and instead created six federal circuit courts around the country, which were to be run by sixteen new federal judges. This gave the Federalists more power because these judges were to be handpicked by President Adams, under the approval of the Federalist dominated Congress.
…show more content…
This is because the act was passed just before the end of his presidency, and it is said that Adams appointed many of the judges at midnight before Jefferson’s inauguration. Along with choosing the new judges, Adams made another move so that Federalists could further control the Judicial system. He appointed his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to serve as the next Chief Justice. Doing this further shut Jefferson out from the Judiciary system, leaving all of the power in the hands of the Federalists. Adams specifically felt that it was necessary because Marshall told him that by controlling the Judiciary system, the Federalists would upset Jefferson’s plans as that was the only branch of government that he wouldn’t have access to. Adams didn’t initially want to choose Marshall as the Chief Justice. However, after John Jay declined the position, Adams turned to Marshall who

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmund Randolph Pres. met with these men regularly for advice on major policies Creating Court System only court mentioned in the constitution was supreme court Judiciary act of 1789- one chief justice and 5 associate judges could make decisions on constitutionality 13 district courts and three…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was his job to the commsions to the new appointees. Many of them were delivered while some were not, including William Marbury’s. When the new President, Thomas Jefferson was sworn in, he told James Madison, who was the new Secretary of Sate, to not deliver the commissions to the other judge appointees. Marbury and many others brought a lawsuit to make Madison deliver the commissions. They then asked the Supreme Court, in its original juristdiction, to issue a writ of “Mandamus”, a court order directing Madison to carry out his duty to deliver the commissions. This leads us to the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison in front of the Supreme Court, with ex-Secretary of State John Marshall as Chief Justice.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Revolution was a modern and democratic revolution headed by the upper middle class and had three key phases.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was the last Federalist president which led to the next 16 years of Thomas Jefferson as president for two terms and James Madison as president for two terms. Jefferson and Madison were members of the Republican Party, which had principles and philosophies that were very different than the views of the Federalists. Jefferson and Madison each abandoned the Republican philosophies for Federalism. Jefferson and Madison took on Federalist views while being President of the United States. However, Jefferson and Madison each picked somewhere to stand their ground and keep some of their Republican views.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the year of 1789 the most crucial piece in the American legislation emerge from the first section of congress. The Judiciary Act of 1789 implemented the judiciary clause of the constitution that gave power to the congress to set a new number of justices on the Supreme Court and established a new system in the federal courts, as well creating a position for attorney general. This Act implemented a high court of six justices that later increase to nine by 1869…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president and Congress have some control of the judiciary with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justices. Congress also may impeach judges, alter the organization of the federal court system, and amend the Constitution.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examining the Federalist Party's Achievements and Shortcomings The Federalist Party, despite its many shortcomings and its callow attitude towards the people actually managed to accomplish quite a bit while in power in the early days of America. The most noteworthy accomplishment of the Federalists of the era was certainly the National Bank. This bank provided for a stable economy that could secure America's prosperity. Without the Federalist Bank, America would have floundered and quickly imploded. The Bank was the early sustenance of a debt-ridden, inflation-cursed nation. Another Federalist achievement was accomplished by one of the party's most esteemed members " Chief Justice John Marshall. His ruling in Marbury v. Madison was critical in determining judicial review and setting up the precedent of just exactly "who" got the right to examine the constitutionality of congressional laws. Adams, the sole Federalist president, achieved another great laurel for the party. While President, perhaps his greatest gift to the nation was not going to war with France. The French diplomatic and maritime agitations set all of America in a war-frenzy, hastily clamoring for war with France. Adams, realizing the fledgling US could not hope to win, kept the US out of the war and in doing so tarnished his own reputation.…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7th Amendment

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is likely that the Founding Fathers drafted this amendment to help secure fairness within the judicial system. I believe that given the injustices that our Founding Fathers were escaping as they fled to the New World it was most likely very important to them to ensure that the government alone would not possess too much power. It would be my guess that they did not greatly trust the judges within the British system of government any more than they trusted the police powers. They may have also worried that without including their own peers from within the communities that the legal system could possibly become corrupt, as they had previously witnessed such things in their homeland.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays