Preview

Federalist Party Achievements And Shortcomings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Party Achievements And Shortcomings
Examining the Federalist Party's Achievements and Shortcomings The Federalist Party, despite its many shortcomings and its callow attitude towards the people actually managed to accomplish quite a bit while in power in the early days of America. The most noteworthy accomplishment of the Federalists of the era was certainly the National Bank. This bank provided for a stable economy that could secure America's prosperity. Without the Federalist Bank, America would have floundered and quickly imploded. The Bank was the early sustenance of a debt-ridden, inflation-cursed nation. Another Federalist achievement was accomplished by one of the party's most esteemed members " Chief Justice John Marshall. His ruling in Marbury v. Madison was critical in determining judicial review and setting up the precedent of just exactly "who" got the right to examine the constitutionality of congressional laws. Adams, the sole Federalist president, achieved another great laurel for the party. While President, perhaps his greatest gift to the nation was not going to war with France. The French diplomatic and maritime agitations set all of America in a war-frenzy, hastily clamoring for war with France. Adams, realizing the fledgling US could not hope to win, kept the US out of the war and in doing so tarnished his own reputation.

Yet the Federalist Party " despite stabilizing the economy, securing the power of the federal government, and preserving the infant nation " was destined to die. The primary reason for this was the fact that the Federalist Party was the party of the rich. Aristocrats were Federalists " they had to be, in order to protect their interests. The common man does not like the rich man. Federalists were considered to be aristocrats, and they were treated with much disfavor. The second reason why the Federalists faded away was their inability to change. The Federalists were a very conservative party, and America was in a radical, democratic phase. The election of 1800

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of 1800 marked the beginning of a 28-year period during which Republicans dominated national politics. Jefferson’s party won easily, in part because of the public outrage over the Federalist Alien and Sedition Acts; in many ways, the acts proved the undoing of the Federalist Party.…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist Party was led by Alexander Hamilton. Federalists favored a strong federal government, believed that the government should be ruled by educated, wealthy men, wanted to pay off national debt, establishing a national credit, promoted entrepreneurship & manufacturing, and interpreted the United States Constitution with an open mind. These views supported the Federalists’ view on the French Revolution and so did Jefferson’s party.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The night before John Adams left the presidential office he appointed various men to be Justices of the Piece. All of these men were Federalist like himself. One of which was William Marbury. However, when Thomas Jefferson came into office he refused to give the men that had been appointed last minute by Adams their federal commission. Jefferson used his secretary of state, James Madison, to be his voice about the situation. Enraged William Marbury and others sued the government and the case went to the Supreme Court. One of the members of the Supreme Court was the recently appointed Chief Justice John Marshall.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the election of 1800, the Democratic-Republican candidate, Thomas Jefferson, was elected as president. Well-known as a supporter of states rights and an agrarian society, Jefferson felt the need to reduce the differences between the two parties and did much to accomplish this through his two terms. Although Jefferson was elected as a Democratic-Republican, through his term he adopted many Federalist's views in order to do what was best for the common good. In a way, Jefferson did out-federalize the federalists by taking their arguments he felt were strong enough to be supported by the public and were best for the common good.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson was the Secretary of State, he has a big responsibility of controlling foreign affairs. He was also known for opposing Hamilton's plan of the National bank. He strongly felt the plain gave more power to the government than the Constitution allows. Most southern states had already paid off their war debts, he questioned why they should bail out northern states that still had debts. Thomas Jefferson also favored the Strict Constitution. The group felt congress should be limited to the power specifically granted by the Constitution. He criticized Hamilton for the use of federal force to repress legitimate criticism. Democratic Republicans favored him and James Madison also. The party was strongest among southerners and farmers.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Essay

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Marshall evolved as one of the most influential people in the history of the Judiciary. Marshall was the Federalist holdout who stayed true to the Hamiltonian principals. His establishment of new Supreme Court principals which were all in favor of the Federalist unique beliefs set a precedent of the functionality of the court. Marshall’s theory of Judicial Review was established so the Supreme Court can rule based on the constitutionality of act of congress. Marshall evolved as the pioneer that changed the Supreme Court. The Supremacy of Federalists was adopted to keep state rules in check while all under Constitutional rule. Marshall’s last successful attempt to keep Federalist ideas in the court was his development that there needs to be legitimacy of broad interpretation of the Constitution. In Marbury vs. Madison, Gibbon vs. Ogden, and Mccullah vs. Maryland respectively, Marshall’s Federalist beliefs were shown to be a successful way to give the Judicial Branch more authority then ever before.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton founded the Federalists, which lasted for 24 years. The Federalists can be viewed as being the one that controls the Federal government, until in 1801 when they were no longer control. The Federalists were known to be built on a network of supporters who supported Alexander Hamilton fiscal policies. The supporters were known to be wealthy and aristocratic people. To illustrate, his supporters were Northern businessmen, large land owners, merchants, and bankers. The supporters eventually grew into Federalist Party, because of the strong nationalistic government that the Democratic-Republicans did not have. The Federalists believed in banks because of Alexander Humiliation who came up with the idea. In addition, the Federalist had Hamilton and James Madison who supported the Constitution. However, Madison agreed with certain points that the Democratic-Republicans had introduced, which made him switched over from the Federalists. Although, when he was in the Federalists party Madison stated “that he agrees with the constitution to secure the American people rights” (Foner, “Voices of Freedom”…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays