Preview

What Techniques Did Mittal Utilize In Order To Dominate The Steel Market?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Techniques Did Mittal Utilize In Order To Dominate The Steel Market?
What techniques did Mittal utilize in order to dominate the world steel market? ArcelorMittal is currently the world's leader and largest producer of steel. The company was founded in 2006 by Lakshi Mittal, the current Chairman and CEO. Currently there are around 220,000 employees and profits of $7.94 billion. The company was formed through a takeover of Arcelor by Mittal. Mittal utilized a hostile takeover that was replacing a planned merger of Arcelor and Severstal. Therefore the company was formed in the name, ArcelorMittal. The major key factor for the company's success was through various acquisitions. Other steel companies fell off in this area and therefore couldn't become as well-known as ArcelorMittal. Throughout the essay, there …show more content…
The buyout was opposed by majority of the people but through the $40 billion investment and battling, he succeeded. Steel became a symbol to express the country was industrialized. Mittal is therefore looked very highly upon in the global steel industry. Mittal grew up in a small town of 50,000 people in harsh conditions with barely any basic resources such as water. 1989, he became a manager of a steel manufacturer in Trinidad and realized he could spread out in other countries by starting out in Kazakhstan. This became a huge exporting center to China. Spreading out in former communist states to rapidly expand the business. This is an extremely risky move by Mittal but he realized and saw the chances of expansion and acted upon his instincts. 1st step towards success in the mills? Downsizing. Mittal reduced the amount of workers to a little over 10,000, and also simplified the facility. Downsizing is often utilized when the company observes a declining revenue, poor economic conditions or for any other strategic reasons. Downsizing reduces the amount of workers therefore reducing overhead costs. The investment in the latest technology allowed the few workers to be able to monitor …show more content…
ISG was sold to Mittal in order to work together to expand the business, and agreed on a global strategy by thinking of the world as one market. They aim to buyout Arcelor, the 2nd largest manufacturer in the world with steel mills located everywhere around the world. Much more synergies fit with Mittal better than any other company. Guy Dolle, CEO of Arcelor, turned down Mittal's bid and this is when the hostile takeover was announced. Some believed that downsizing will result in rise of unemployment. A buyout team was formed to persuade shareholders because they play a huge role. In this case, Arcelor had only 20% of long-term shareholders but how will they get 80% on Mittal's side? Mittal claimed that the merger will help corporate and shareholder values to rise. As any hostile takeover, there are arguments and both firms will have their own say. As a desperate act, Dolle tries to merge with Severstal, a Russian steel producing company, but fails as Russian firms were not trusted due to their ties with Putin also because Sevestral was only 1/4 of Mittal’s company. Mittal also persuaded the shareholders, releasing articles that they don't have their own voice as he started gaining more people on his side and as shareholder prices rise Selling shares to Mittal helped them to gain major profit. Finally the battle was one and the buyout was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. The owner of Carnegie Steel Company, Andrew Carnegie, pioneered the use of vertical integration. Vertical integration is a system of related businesses in which a parent company owns its suppliers. Back then the railroads needed steel for their rails and cars, the navy needed steel for their new naval fleet, and the cities needed steel to build their skyscrapers. When Andrew Carnegie saw this demand he took advantage of it. When Carnegie started his steel company he started with a very little amount of money so in order to pay less to manufacture the steel and increase his profits, Carnegie bought out companies that provided raw materials like iron, which is one of the main components of steel. He bought out coal companies as well because it was needed to heat the furnaces that were used in the Bessemer process. Not only did he buy products to produce his steel, he also bought railroads so he could ship his steel at a much lower cost. He was able to beat out competitors by producing his steel cheap and efficient that everyone chose to buy form him and not anyone else.…

    • 567 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie believed in applying survival of the fittest to business, while J.P. Morgan established a community of interest among the larger corporations. (M.A.P.A.H.) Although their beliefs were different, the end goal was the same, to essentially battle over the monopoly of steel. In 1890, Carnegie dominated the steel industry, this troubled Morgan, so he bought Carnegie out for $480 million. (M.A.P.A.H.) Morgan gathered together United States Steel, which was an amalgamation of 180 independent businesses. This business, US Steel, was capitalized at $1 billion dollars! Morgan demolished Carnegie’s steel company by owning or regulating 65 iron ore mines [ 1906, Lake Superior ], over 700 steel and iron works, 1,100 miles of railroad…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nucor

    • 8592 Words
    • 36 Pages

    C. In the early of 2000, Nucor followed growth strategies which are new acquisitions, new plants construction, continued plant upgrades and cost reduction efforts, and joint ventures. The strategy had helped the company to overcome the recession time and resulted in a glorious success. However, the steel industry is extremely intensive and Nucor had to cope with competitive pressure from both domestic and foreign steel market. Because of recession time, the steel demand was decreasing dramatically while the company was suffered over capacity. In addition, Nucor had to confront with strong competitors which are US Steel (X) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Moreover, the company had to deal with price competition resulting from dumping of foreign competitors. The high material cost is also another challenge which Nucor had to cope with.…

    • 8592 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the 1800’s in the United States, the steel business was revolutionized by an American business icon, Andrew Carnegie. After growing up in a poor family, he used his self-taught knowledge to build wealth using investments to build a foundation of wealth. After coming from a humble background, Carnegie established himself as one of the wealthiest businessmen of his time period, and one of the most generous philanthropists of history.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The $55 value is on the lower range of the analyst eztimates, with a best guess estimate of $67.94. Since the value of the stock had been below $45 for 4 months, the offer of 55 dollars represented a 29% premium to investors. Bollenbach knew that management would be resistant of any attempt to be acquired, regardless of price, because of failed previous attempts to negotiate a friendly merger at year end 1996. The 55-dollar benchmark created an expectation for ITT management to achieve that level, or higher and the premium is enough to demonstrate to investors it is a real offer. Their support will be key as they will have a vote deciding the fate of the poison pill provisions which need to be removed to make the deal necessary.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Carnegie Steel controlled every phase of steel production process (from mining iron ore, to RR’s, to mills)…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. How do you characterize Steel Work’s products and customers? What are the problems faced by Gary Lemming?…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grand Met Case

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The major dilemma at hand is avoiding a takeover. The economy was bad at the time, and the company's stock price was thought to be undervalued, as their low P/E ratio of 13.3 indicated. Management needs to find out why their stock price is so undervalued.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish-American who lived during the 19th century. Carnegie was an industrialist who played a pivotal role in the expansion of the American steel industry. Although he sometimes used methods that hurt the people to make profit , Carnegie contributed to America's growth as a nation economically because he connected different parts of America by building bridges and railroads and he helped cities to grow by building modern structures such as skyscrapers. Carnegie was born in Dunfermline, Scotland in the attic of a small house on November 25th, 1835.1 He was named after his grandfather, Andrew Carnegie, who was a popular man in the district, being the head of the lively ones of his day and the chief of their club, “Patiemuir College.”2 He grew up having little formal education, but his family held books and learning at a high level of importance.3 In 1848, when he was 13 years old, Carnegie and his family moved to the United States and made a home in Allegheny, Pennsylvania. He worked in a factory and later worked his way through the telegraphing business. Carnegie’s ability to get his foot in the door of the railroad business enabled him to learn the tricks of the trade and also about business altogether. 4 With the experiences he acquired, he was well on his way to becoming one of the most successful business men in America of his time. Carnegie’s life was one full of many events, ups and downs, gains and losses, but it certainly can be said that it was a life well lived. 1Andrew Carnegie, Louise W. Carnegie, and John C. Van Dyke, Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920), 2. 2 Ibid.…

    • 2374 Words
    • 68 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A moderately strong competitive force: it is less likely that new start-up firms will enter the steel industry. According to this case, existing steel producers are anxious to operate their plant at their full capacity. It is more likely to seek out customers in geographic markets where they do not currently have a presence. Moreover, it is clear that new entry may occur when companies like Nucor and Mittal Steel acquire less successful steel producers and try to turn the operations of the newly…

    • 2450 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 10

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What are the primary competitive forces impacting U.S. steel producers in general and the producers like Nucor that make new steel products via recycling scrap steel in particular? Please do a five-forces analysis to support your answer. 2. What driving forces do you see at work in this industry? Are they likely to impact the industry’s competitive structure favorably or unfavorably? 3. How attractive are the prospects for future profitability of U.S. steelmakers? Should Nucor consider expanding in this type of industry environment? Why or why not? 4. What type of strategy has Nucor followed? Which of the five generic strategies discussed in Chapter 5 is Nucor employing? Is there any reason to believe that Nucor has achieved a sustainable competitive advantage over many of its steel industry rivals? If so, what type of competitive advantage does Nucor enjoy? 5. What are the specific policies and operating practices that Nucor has employed to implement and execute its chosen strategy? 6. What specific factors account for why Nucor has been so successful over the past several decades? Do these factors have more to do with great strategy, great strategy execution, or great leadership? 7. What does a SWOT analysis reveal about Nucor’s situation? Does Nucor have any core or distinctive competencies? 8. What is your assessment of Nucor’s financial performance the past several years? How strong is the company’s financial condition? 9. What issues does Nucor management need to address? 10. What recommendations would you make to Dan DiMicco?…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucor

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As mentioned in the case the main problem is the excess of steel in the steel market. Right now foreign steel is being dumped in the US. This results that supply exceeds demand which results off course in decreases of profit for many steel companies. This gives a lot of pressure to the companies and most of them are not able to survive the pressure and go bankrupt. Nucor adapted their strategy and made sure that they were able to survive the fierce competition. They did this by focusing on 2 main lines of business:- Production of Steel from recycled scrapped metals - Joist productionThe focus strategy made sure that Nucor Corporation became one of the biggest steel companies in the US. Looking at the five-forces of Porter the following can be concluded: Competitive forces is HIGH! When we look at the global competition the biggest rivalry is between the US industry and China’s steel industry. China is producing at a lower cost than the US and Europe. When we look at the economies of scale China is able to get more benefit over rivals. Trends of acquisition and merger is increasing for economies of scale to be able to compete with the competitor. Threat of new entrants is MODERATE! There are many reasons why the threat of new entrants is moderate. First of all you need large capital to enter the market and be able to compete with competitors that are good at producing economies of scale. Second point is the low switching costs for buyers of steel and not to forget the government rules and regulations that are imposed. This all increases the threat also because of the low…

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Upon Review of Nucor Corporation’s current findings, analysis of internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as a comparative analysis at the industrial level of the steel industry, the following includes a summary of findings and recommendations for Nucor Steel Corporation:…

    • 9373 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1 ma

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page

    In March 1999, LVMH made a 100% takeover bid to the Gucci Group. The offer was $ 81 per share for all shares, including the ones recently issued to PPR, or $ 85 per share for all if the newly issued shares to PPR were rescinded. This proposal can be interpreted as a sign of high interest of the acquirer in Gucci. Most likely, LVMH believed the target company was quite undervalued and the synergies between the two companies would be fairly significant. The reason behind the structure of the deal (higher price if PPR’s shares were rescinded) was the dilution suffered by LVMH from the entrance of PPR group in Gucci. If the acquirer could undo the deal, they would not have seen its position diluted in the target company. Hence, it is advantageous for them to…

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Carnegie Steel Company was a successful factory, which employed many hundred of workers. Andrew Carnegie, who was the owner of the company, wanted a large successful business, which he had achieved already, but he was always looking for ways to save and make more money. By 1892, unions had been formed (Gardner p. 70). The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers, founded in 1876, it quickly became the largest union with some 24,000 workers (Ciment p. 33). The union prevented Andrew Carnegie from lowering cost and wages.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays