Preview

What should Betty do?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1082 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What should Betty do?
What should Betty do?
Based on the present situation, Betty needs to evaluate the ethical and legal aspect of the situation. Did Betty lied for the Senior Management position? The question is about what is right and what is ethical and, what is the right thing for Betty to do? The current proposed action for Betty is, whether the action is legal?
According to Bagley and Savage (2009), it is vital to address the legal issue first in order to establish the perception that legal compliance is the starting point for any standard. Also the authors stated that “when you try to keep to the letter of the law while undermining the spirit, you are likely to violate the letter in the end” (p. 26). This implies that it is better to adhere to the law because law helps to shape the competitive environment which affects each of the five forces that determine the attractiveness of an industry. In this regard being part of senior management, it is important for Betty to choose the legal path.
Does answering yes to the legal issue, maximize shareholders value? There are two answers to the question, yes or no. If Betty answers yes, the next question is, is it ethical? The issues of ethical are to prove to the customers, employees, community, environment, and suppliers than satisfying the shareholders. If the proposed issue maximizes shareholders value and it is ethical, then Betty has to disclose to the human resource department.
Similarly, if her answer in maximizing shareholders value is no, then Betty requires to evaluate the effects and cost on shareholders with regards to other stakeholders. The question is would it be ethical not to take action? If the answer to this question is no, then Betty has to disclose her actions to shareholders.
How should Human Resources handle this situation?
Since human resources have requested Betty’s personal and educational information to update her records, the human resources department needs to give her a deadline as to when the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Option 2 – Virtue Ethics Evaluation: A virtue ethicist would not approve of this action by Kelsey; Kelsey is demonstrating the characteristics of a non-virtuous individual. They’re showing disloyalty to all the shareholders, infidelity, and dishonesty.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dennis the city Manager is working late and he catches his new Budget Director Susan in a compromising situation with the Assistant City Manager. The employee policy prohibits this type of behavior between their employees. According to the City Code of Ethics this type of behavior is unacceptable and calls for dismissal.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421 Week 3

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citations: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | |Description and Requirement of Law |Establishment of Law |Importance of Law |Workplace Application |…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    5. Is it morally right for Laura not to hire the best qualified for the position, in…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment Laws Chart

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |Description and Requirement of Law |Establishment of Law |Importance of Law |Workplace Application |…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3072 Lying by omission involves intentionally A. withholding material facts. B. creating “noise” within the communication that knowingly confuses or deceives the receiver. C. using highly technical language that the receiver does not understand. D. trying to not hurt someone’s feelings. E. telling “white lies.” Correct Response: A 3074 Conflicts of interest exist when employees must choose whether to A. advance their own interests, those of the organization, or those of some other group. B. advance the interests of the organization or those of society. C. accept bribes. D. carry out an assignment they perceive as unethical. E. report an unethical coworker. Correct Response: A 3077 Which of the following is not an ethical issue in the area of communications? A. Concealed facts in advertising B. Bribery C. False or deceptive advertising D. Ambiguous statements in advertising E. Lying Correct Response: B…

    • 5008 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Is it important for organizations, managers, employees to practice sound ethical decision making? Why or why not?…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consider the ethical dilemmas of this case. What are the possible ethical dilemmas and implications?…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company X Ethics Program

    • 1435 Words
    • 46 Pages

    It is the policy of the Company to comply with all applicable laws, to act fairly,…

    • 1435 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employees of Given Company are expected to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Violations resulting from employee activities, business or personal, will not be condoned. Employees are expected to conduct all business activities well above the minimum standards required by law. Employees are expected to communicate all situational uncertainty with their direct supervisor and/or human resources director to ensure proper guidance and clarification. When in doubt, one should always waiver on the side of caution and seek advice, rather than make a choice that will leave a lasting impression on the reputation of the individual employee or the company as a whole.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case presents a very typical situation that people encounter while working in the corporate environment. What is ethical, what is morally correct and what is just right out against the law are the questions that we all face while working in a corporate environment. Some of the ethical questions are governed by the law facing the situation. For example while working in an investment bank you most probably have access to inside information about upcoming deals that one could possibly use for personal monetary gain or you could act as a tippie and possibly share that confidential information with others. This kind of a situation is definilety governed by the law and you can actually be charged with various insider trading laws and possibly do some jail time as well. The other situation that is presented in the case is purely about ones ethical and moral standards. The analyst either has to compromise her loyalty towards her company B&B or towards her best friend Lori. While the situation presented is not a real zero-sum game, i.e., one player’s loss does not equal to the gain of the other player. When faced in a situation like this one has to think about what decisions can be made that will have the least affect on the players involved. The analyst should not look at the situation she faces as black or white. She should rather think about other options she might have to retain her friend’s loyalty while not compromising her loyalty towards her current employer. For example, Lori has already been laid off by her current employer, Universal group. The Universal group has already broken certain ethical and moral laws by not informing about the situation to B&B. So can the analyst come up with a situation where she can get Lori immediately and legally hired at B&B and convince her to share the information with B&B. In essence Lori will not have to feel guilty about not keeping the information confidential as has been laid off and the…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In June of 2003, Martha Stewart was indicted on several criminal and civil counts from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) . Without consideration of the verdict, the question remains; Did Martha Stewart, as CEO, act responsibly? Even though she was found guilty on all four counts against her, she could still be considered to have acted ethically. To determine the responsibility and ethics of her actions, the specifics of the case will be applied to a process to determine both the utility and the consequences of her actions. What was the affect of her actions (utility), what were the rights and duties involved (deontology), and ultimately, a decision as to were here actions ethical?…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    was thinking only of herself and the profits she’d make, and not considering the company…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first step in any ethical decision-making process is actually recognising that there is a moral issue. The fact that the decision in question is going to have a significant effect on the workers and that is quite relevant to both parties suggests that the decision is ethical…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics