Preview

What Role Should the Us Play in World Affairs in the 21st Century?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Role Should the Us Play in World Affairs in the 21st Century?
The US role in 21st century world affairs must shape an international community that benefits US interests, and is neither dependent on nor antagonistic to US global supremacy. The US may achieve this by relying on soft power and the influence of our global allies and competitors to accomplish our national security goals. America should lead world affairs through cooperation and sharing of our ideals to solve geopolitical problems, rather than relying primarily on our military preeminence. The current National Strategy calls for the United States to lead the international order “as a nation first among equals”, suggesting that it is the citizens’ responsibility to encourage stability, foster economic growth, promote democratic values, and protect global strategic interests while respecting the intertwined goals and values of the global community. America must rely on this softer strategy as we proceed into the next decade, in order to ensure our dominance at home and abroad. This forward-thinking role is practical because the world of the 21st century is a multilateral world where, while retaining military, economic, and cultural preeminence, the US may be challenged by adversaries and allies alike as power shifts and resources become scarcer. In the coming decades, our strength will rely on the ability to persuade rather than coerce our global neighbors, and to work “through, by and with” partners to cross-level political and economic burdens.

In today’s globalizing world, US interests are increasingly intertwined with those of our allies and opponents. Access to strategic resources and pathways for trade – Afghanistan and the developing South and Central Asia transnational lines of communication in particular – exposes Americans to foreign cultures where a citizens’ ability to freely express themselves democratically will not always mirror our values. In this environment, Americans must abide by democratic principles at home, and pursue our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 105 Assignment 2

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the Civil War and by the mid-20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United States’ military functions as the world’s “police.”…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In brief, Hilary Clinton proposes that the United States should remain the central power and continue its role as the world’s indispensable country. She claims that without the central power regulating the affairs, the result will be chaos and conflict (p. 11). She expresses her plans of how to maintain the role by utilizing all levers of powers. Her approaches include the use of technology, nonproliferation, economics as well as development and human rights.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A major debate that is being discussed both domestically and internationally is the involvement of the United States of America in international affairs. This debate includes the practicality of where the United States has intervened in foreign affairs, its right to intervene in the first place considering past mistakes and questionable leadership, and whether or not that foreign involvement is in the general public’s best interest. Obviously, the two sides of the debate refer to the ‘yes’ position, explained by Ivan Eland (as in yes, the United States should limit it’s global involvement) and also the ‘no’ position, backed by President Barack Obama (as in no, the United States should not limit it’s foreign involvement). Eland’s basis for his argument is that the United States has habitually overspent it’s treasure and overextended it’s military power to a point where we cannot keep pace economically and which could bring upon the demise of the American government as we know it. He also points out that continued foreign endeavors increases the risk of the United States being a target for terrorist attack. Obama’s vision is that The United States of America needs to re-establish its place as a world leader by maintaining an active foreign policy. Obama admits that mistakes have been made where international affairs are concerned, but that is a reason to fix those mistakes and step up as a suitable leader once more. Discussed later in the paper is my own point of view, which supports President Barack Obama and his plan for active engagement in foreign affairs, in a conservative and confidant manner.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preceding the twentieth century, America finally made the world appear smaller. By utilizing its resources of advanced communication, transportation, and ideas, the United States became a world power (Keene, 170). This new title created conflict in and outside of America. Through this dissention, America’s role was formed by the desire to expand, obligation to help allies, and debate over entering the League of Nations. The role of the United States in the twentieth-century world should have been dominated by the hunger for power but also the desire to help those in need.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 10, America Under Fire, two subtitles in the chapter are called “Strains in the Unipolar Order” and “Retreat from Multilateralism”. These two topics help the reader understand the tension and thought processes American had in the late 1990’s. The relative calm of the late 1990s affirmed Americans’ long-standing belief that the peace, is the natural state of global affairs, and that the spread of democracy and free markets would produce violent conflict. In addition to the unrest over globalization, a second source of tension confronted the makers of American foreign policy after the Cold War: the growing rift between Washington and the array of international institutions the United States had actively supported since World War II.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    War Powers Act of 1973

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America holds the position in the world as a nation in which foreign policy is focused and debated as a matter of embittered public outrage and controversy. This is the reality not only among the party in office and their equivalent opponents but mainly within the very party themselves. It is much truer within the party that is controlling the executive branch. This criticism thrown at foreign policy is not that evil. It is a well meaning constructive criticism that tells the incoherence of policies passed by the executive branch. However, the fault is not likely coming from a flawed national character or among the attitudes of the leaders but the circumstances that surround it. Such circumstances comprise an increasing external challenge coupled with congressionally mandated restraints on the executive branch. The combination of both provides a dangerous whipsaw that can render American foreign policy as ineffective.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Timeline

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Patterson, T. E. (2009). The American democracy (9th Ed.) PP.30-52. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With ever-changing minds and ideals, it is fundamental for countries to work together in the best interests of their citizens. An arising threat to current world order is governance gap. With recent shifts in power and a number of countries in limbo between autocracy and democracy, the way international issues are dealt with could change. One country almost exclusively found at the heart of important issues has been the United States. With the recent US presidential election, many have been left wondering if President Elect Donald J. Trump will hold true to his campaign promises: building the wall alongside the Mexican-American boarder, aiding the hardworking Americans who have been cheated of their wealth and cancelling payments to climate…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferguson paper

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since George H.W. Bush (41) took office in 1989, the United States has intervened in several high-risk situations such as the Gulf War, military deployment in Iraq, and the ongoing War in Afghanistan resulting in thousands of deaths of American soldiers. This is not okay because these soldiers are sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters, of fellow American citizens. Although the President can involve the United States’ military in any situation with the permission of Congress, he should not so if the opposition is a threat. The United States should not be the world’s policeman because foreign affairs require a substantial amount of resources that the U.S. should not let go; more so the United States should focus resources to being a global caregiver.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foreign/Domestic Policy

    • 1711 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "As the 1900's gave way to the new millennium, it became increasingly clear that a new era in American (and world) history had begun. The old era had been dominated by the Cold War struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. The new era was defined by the rise of a new global economy...the ways in which the world's peoples lived, worked, and governed themselves. Global communication, trade, and capital flow all grew rapidly..." (Griffith, Baker 531). The United States rose to being the most powerful military supremacy nation in the world due to Reagan and Bush's destruction of the Cold War, bridging the 80's into the new 90's. George Bush's CIA and ambassadorial experience provided Americas key to our foreign policy negotiations, aiding in our nations leadership over the world. This defeat and new era caused our domestic and social society within America into a state of confusion and caused Americans to question what role they would play in this new society. "Not only did the Cold War define America's stance in the world, dictating foreign policy choices from southeast Asia to Latin America; it defined the contours of domestic politics as well," (Chafe 549). How can we believe now after September 11, that we still or always have had leadership or supremacy in this world? How could the heart of our country be damaged so much affecting our nation as a whole? This recent tragedy damaged the core of our patriotism changing foreign and domestic policy after the 90's. During the 90's, a time of new cultural expression and power, the US was willing to use any economic, political, or military force necessary to uphold the new global system. After the Reagan legacy, President Bill Clinton created the "New Democrats," which, "sought to replace the party's older industrial and agricultural bases with a new, if unwieldy, coalition of women, minorities, social liberals, and technological progressives," (Griffith/Baker 533). In looking at…

    • 1711 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    syllabus

    • 2035 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this course we will be looking at the changes in American culture that occur as the United States goes from relative isolation at the end of the 19th century to an active and integrated part of the global community by the beginning of the 21st century. We will examine ways in which U.S. culture was impacted by its international involvement. The course will examine why this happens and how Americans responded to this new international role. We will explore reactions to, and results of, that expanding role both inside and outside the United States. Throughout the course we will seek to answer the following two part question: Why does the United States move from relative isolation into an international role and what are the consequences for U.S. society of that change?…

    • 2035 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arrogance of Power Review

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages

    William J. Fulbright, a democratic Senator from Arkansas, was Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1966 when The Arrogance of Power was published. In an excerpt from Fulbright’s book, he analyzes the misguided thinking behind America's global interventionism and its delusion of righteous all-powerfulness. These symptoms are a confusion of power and virtue. Fulbright defines the arrogance of power as, “a psychological need that nations seem to have in order to prove that they are bigger, better, or stronger than other nations” (2). William J. Fulbright uses persuasive appeals in his well structured book, The Arrogance of Power to help convey his views on U.S. war strategies.…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his Farewell Address, George Washington advised the nation against foreign affairs. It is plainly obvious that America did not heed Washington’s warning, as the onslaught of international world wars, among other things, forces the United States to interfere. America often plays the part of the “big brother” when it comes to national conflicts. The U.S. is revered by other countries, recognized as a powerful ally and a devastating enemy. Some historians and moral philosophers claim that it is America’s democratic duty to abandon the policy of isolationism and secure the liberty of the U.S. by fighting when necessary.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has only been a little more than a decade since the grave events of September 11, 2001, a tragic day forever marked in America’s history. The attack on the World Trade Center was a pivotal occasion that began the crisis that is the United State’s moral and political ambiguity of the 21st century. This has been a decade of vague and changing policy when looking at international affairs. From the power change in the Pentagon to the transition of circumstances across the globe, the years following the 9/11 attacks have emphasized the point of stance that Jack Snyder has taken in his “One World, Rival Theories.” Black and white cease to exist when foreign policy ideologies are put to practice; the theories are bent and blended to suit the present…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays