Preview

Strains In The Unipolar Order And Multilateralism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strains In The Unipolar Order And Multilateralism
In Chapter 10, America Under Fire, two subtitles in the chapter are called “Strains in the Unipolar Order” and “Retreat from Multilateralism”. These two topics help the reader understand the tension and thought processes American had in the late 1990’s. The relative calm of the late 1990s affirmed Americans’ long-standing belief that the peace, is the natural state of global affairs, and that the spread of democracy and free markets would produce violent conflict. In addition to the unrest over globalization, a second source of tension confronted the makers of American foreign policy after the Cold War: the growing rift between Washington and the array of international institutions the United States had actively supported since World War II. …show more content…
American preeminence provoked resentment and a certain measure of jealousy within states and societies with fewer resources and less clout. Most of discontent was directed toward American soft power, the multinational corporations and media outlets whose promotion of consumer culture threatened traditional customs and forms of expression in multiple cultures. Some people denounced American foreign policy, mainly the governments selective procedure to free trade. Critics perceived American officials to be overly moralistic. Mostly because U.S. actions often proclaimed democratic values were misplaced, but because U.S. actions often contradicted them. These controversies tarnished America’s image at the peak of its world power. America traditionally views the nation as a city on a hill, but foreign governments and citizens saw a Washington arrogant with power and indifferent to problems such as global warming, mass starvation in Africa, AIDs, and weapon proliferation. It was clear that the unipolar order was far from a harmony of interest, let alone a universal embrace of American …show more content…
More than 150 governments from different countries pledged to support the treaty. The treaty was based on the premise that a ban on testing would prevent potential proliferators from building weapons in the first place. Critics predicted that hostile nations would exploit American restraint and threaten the United States when its guard was down. The United States found itself an outcast on a wide variety of other international agreements. Clinton refused to sign the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention calling for a worldwide ban on land mines, whose primary victims were civilians in war torn developing countries. The Department of Defense opposed the land mines treaty on the grounds that “antipersonnel” mines were vital to preventing a North Korean invasion of South Korea. George W. Bush became president in January 2001. He was the governor of Texas and the son of former president George H. W. Bush. Bush had no intention to mend fences with some relationships with some countries. Condoleezza Rice was Bush’s national security adviser who had dismissed during the campaign as an illusion. To her, the multilateral cooperation and institution building embraced by the United States since the end of World War II had not brought the rest of the world in line with the nations democratic values. Bush’s administration produced open ended commitments and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The book begins in the United States – the present-day world hyper-power. The United States’ ascent to world dominance began after its victory in World War II, which was catalyzed in large part through what the country offered – freedom, as well as a chance to start anew. Offerings such as freedom sparked an influx of immigrants, and immigrants attracted into the United States in turn built up human population and made the job market more competitive. However, as America’s power grew stronger, the country became increasingly an “empire.” Exercising its powers, America began over-using military force, threatening foreign governments, and taking global actions without international approval. These intrusive behaviors of America, however, go against history. Lessons learned from the past suggest that world super-powers could only dominate through compliance with foreign nations, such as how Achaemenid Empire ruled their people.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2010 the National Security Strategy dramatically shifted from the philosophy of the Bush administration’s views on international security. It announced the obvious concern of the United States’ role in the increasing globalization of the world. The Obama administration places more emphasis on cementing traditional allies as well as creating new alliances with other states. This way the responsibility of world security would be more shared rather…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A major debate that is being discussed both domestically and internationally is the involvement of the United States of America in international affairs. This debate includes the practicality of where the United States has intervened in foreign affairs, its right to intervene in the first place considering past mistakes and questionable leadership, and whether or not that foreign involvement is in the general public’s best interest. Obviously, the two sides of the debate refer to the ‘yes’ position, explained by Ivan Eland (as in yes, the United States should limit it’s global involvement) and also the ‘no’ position, backed by President Barack Obama (as in no, the United States should not limit it’s foreign involvement). Eland’s basis for his argument is that the United States has habitually overspent it’s treasure and overextended it’s military power to a point where we cannot keep pace economically and which could bring upon the demise of the American government as we know it. He also points out that continued foreign endeavors increases the risk of the United States being a target for terrorist attack. Obama’s vision is that The United States of America needs to re-establish its place as a world leader by maintaining an active foreign policy. Obama admits that mistakes have been made where international affairs are concerned, but that is a reason to fix those mistakes and step up as a suitable leader once more. Discussed later in the paper is my own point of view, which supports President Barack Obama and his plan for active engagement in foreign affairs, in a conservative and confidant manner.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preceding the twentieth century, America finally made the world appear smaller. By utilizing its resources of advanced communication, transportation, and ideas, the United States became a world power (Keene, 170). This new title created conflict in and outside of America. Through this dissention, America’s role was formed by the desire to expand, obligation to help allies, and debate over entering the League of Nations. The role of the United States in the twentieth-century world should have been dominated by the hunger for power but also the desire to help those in need.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “A world free of nuclear weapons is a global public good of the highest order” (Ki-Moon). Ban Ki-Moon is the United Nations Secretary-General. Ki-Moon was born in South Korea, in the past, wars tore through South Korea and had received threats of nuclear destruction. Because of these tragic events, Ki-Moon feels very strongly that nuclear weapons are the world’s greatest threat (Ki-Moon). Ki-Moon was not the only to think this way. After World War l, the American people also started to see how destructive the weapons were. Senator William Borah proposed disarmament in 1920. The proposition became popular very quickly throughout the United States (Brookhiser). Although the idea of disarmament had caught on, the United States’s nuclear stockpile…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War Powers Act of 1973

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America holds the position in the world as a nation in which foreign policy is focused and debated as a matter of embittered public outrage and controversy. This is the reality not only among the party in office and their equivalent opponents but mainly within the very party themselves. It is much truer within the party that is controlling the executive branch. This criticism thrown at foreign policy is not that evil. It is a well meaning constructive criticism that tells the incoherence of policies passed by the executive branch. However, the fault is not likely coming from a flawed national character or among the attitudes of the leaders but the circumstances that surround it. Such circumstances comprise an increasing external challenge coupled with congressionally mandated restraints on the executive branch. The combination of both provides a dangerous whipsaw that can render American foreign policy as ineffective.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this International Involvement Paper, I will present issues regarding the American involvement in International affairs between 1890 and 1905.This paper will provide examples of American involvement in international affairs. Also, this paper will describe the extent to which America’s involvement in international affairs affected global politics. America is the most influential country around globe. The world countries depend on The United States to maintain harmony, and to apply the open-minded egalitarian principles. The international system was built around American ideals and power. However, other countries along with The United Nations security can be counted on, to deal with the terrorization structure of America ideals. According…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This unchallenged faith in American exceptionalism makes it harder for Americans to understand why others are less enthusiastic about U.S. dominance, often alarmed by U.S. policies, and frequently irritated by what they see as U.S. hypocrisy, whether the subject is possession of nuclear weapons, conformity with international law, or America’s tendency to condemn the conduct of others while ignoring its own failings. Ironically, U.S. foreign policy would probably be more effective if Americans were less convinced of their own unique virtues and less eager to proclaim…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policeman of the World

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common knowledge that by the 20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United States ' military functions as the world 's police. For centuries United States has been found as the world 's policeman regardless if they were asked for the help or not. In this paper I will highlight two instances in which United States intervene in an international matter. Also I will identify what prompted America to become a dominant force after World War II and what were the differences in the foreign policy before and after the war.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is perceived to be a powerful country, however, it isn’t always for the right reasons. Countries perceive America to be the type to poke into international affairs whenever there is a chance for America…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has only been a little more than a decade since the grave events of September 11, 2001, a tragic day forever marked in America’s history. The attack on the World Trade Center was a pivotal occasion that began the crisis that is the United State’s moral and political ambiguity of the 21st century. This has been a decade of vague and changing policy when looking at international affairs. From the power change in the Pentagon to the transition of circumstances across the globe, the years following the 9/11 attacks have emphasized the point of stance that Jack Snyder has taken in his “One World, Rival Theories.” Black and white cease to exist when foreign policy ideologies are put to practice; the theories are bent and blended to suit the present…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Johnson, Loch K., Kiki Caruson. 2003. The Seven Sins of American Foreign Policy. PS Online, (January), http://www.aspanet.org.…

    • 2996 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roosevelt and Isolationism

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Carroll, John M. and George C. Herring, eds. Modern American Diplomacy. Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1984.…

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. Walker, J. Samuel. Prompt & Utter Destruction, The University of North Carolina Press. 1997,2004. Pg. 38…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays