Preview

What Led To The Failure Of Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Led To The Failure Of Reconstruction
What would have happened if Abraham Lincoln hadn’t been assassinated? This is a question that I have asked myself since the first time I had learned about this time in American history. It is this very question that the author of the article addresses. The initial view towards Reconstruction was that it wouldn’t have made a difference whether or not Lincoln had been part of the picture, many historians had believed that Lincoln would have clashed with Radical Republicans in congress much like Andrew Johnson had. However, this traditional view of Reconstruction has been abandoned by historians. Much like myself, they now view Reconstruction as tragic failed experiment which would leave the problem of racial injustice for generations to come. …show more content…
Before the Civil War, Lincoln had not supported many rights for blacks and did not view Reconstruction as an opportunity for social reform in the United States, however he knew that to maintain order, he would have to work with the radicals in order to make progress towards reuniting the nation. Unlike Lincoln, Johnson lacked these qualities. Johnson was very narrowminded and did not respond will to the opinions and criticism of others. It was these characteristics of Johnson that would lead to the failure of his plan, along with the refusal to work with congress in any way shape or form that would lead to his impeachment in 1868, which he would fall one vote short of conviction. Much like the author I also believe that it is very hard to imagine Lincoln become as alienated as Johnson had during his presidency. Lincoln had always been willing to work closely with all Republicans. It is quite reasonable to imagine Lincoln and Congress agreeing to a Reconstruction …show more content…
Although they do somewhat discuss Lincoln and his plan for Reconstruction, they don’t really talk about what could have been if Lincoln had not been assassinated. Although this conversation is really one strictly based on opinions and debates, it is a question that I have always found of interest. This article took much of the knowledge that I already have and discusses what could have been based on what we know of Lincoln and the events that occurred after his assassination. To me this is extremely interesting because for me it answers some questions as to perhaps what could have been. Although we can’t change history, we can debate and speculate based on events that did happen and use this to possibly determine what could have been. This is something that I absolutely love. The author clearly understood how important Lincoln would have been in the Reconstruction process and what an impact his absence had on how Reconstruction went. I truly believe that Lincoln hadn’t been assassinated Reconstruction would have gone a lot smoother. Lincoln would have run into many of the problems Johnson and congress had endured, however I believe with his open mind and understanding personality he would have been able to come up with better solutions which would have allowed the south to more peacefully enter the Union and therefore would have allowed Reconstruction to be a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    his 14

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Compare and contrast proposed plans for reconstruction using Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address (Links to an external site.), his Last Speech (Links to an external site.), "The Politics of Andrew Johnson (Links to an external site.)," and Thaddeus Stevens's Speech of December 18, 1865 (Links to an external site.). How did these plans differ from each other in terms of slavery, race relations, and the treatment of the South and southern whites? How did differing visions and political approaches influence the clash…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In my own critical opinion of the book, it is very dirt and unentertaining (probably because Lincoln does not real interesting to me). Because of this, it was extremely difficult to make myself read the book, not to mention read a book review on it. One will not be recommending this book to others because I know no one who really loves history. One would notice that the chapters were argumentative, and notice that the author uses primary and secondary sources. The author also uses end notes for his sources.…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killing Lincoln Summary

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The book “Killing Lincoln” written by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard is an in-depth, historical look at the last days of the Civil war; the bloodiest war in our nation’s history that culminated in the assassination of one of the most beloved presidents in American history. This fascinating recounting of the days that led to epic changes occurring in very short measure to our country and those directly involved, and exposing further truths regarding potential conspiracy theories in a historically accurate, page turning thriller.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) If Lincoln had lived, the events and outcomes of Reconstruction probably would have been substantially different. For example, the White House wanted a minimal Reconstruction policy where as Congress wanted a radical Reconstruction policy. Neither of these policies were like the one Lincoln wanted so obviously the outcome was different because of this. Also, Lincoln would have been much kinder to the South as they came back into the Union because he would want the South to be loyal to the Union.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I selected the book Killing Lincoln for my book review because I have always been interested in President Lincoln. I want to learn how he contributed to America, politics, and the Government. Growing up, every history class sparked my interest in President Lincoln because the videos we watched were so interesting. His death was horrendous to America, and I want to learn why it was so terrifying. Learning more about President Lincoln’s assassination sparked my curiosity. I want to learn more about Lincoln’s assassinator, and his reason behind killing Lincoln. President Lincoln’s assassination is known to change America forever, so I was curious to see the before and after of President Lincoln’s term in office. This book also provides a background…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln would have handled Reconstruction more successfully than Andrew Johnson. Specifically, Lincoln understood the moral, political and legal responsibility of enforcing laws like the Reconstruction Acts. He would not opposed laws from a collaboration among Republican leaders in response to Southern resistance like his successor Andrew Johnson. Disagreements over who handles Reconstruction, The best way to reconstruct the states and the integration of newly freed slaves into society would not have disappeared if Lincoln had survived…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few days after the civil War ended, President Lincoln was assassinated and never had the chance to implement his Reconstruction plan. The Reconstruction Era occurred in the period of 1865 to 1877 under the reign of President Andrew Johnson who was the predecessor of President Lincoln. Congress was not scheduled to convene until December 1865, which gave Johnson eight months to pursue his own Reconstruction policies. Under his Reconstruction policies, the former Confederate states were required to join back into the Union and heal the wounds of the nation. Although slavery had been outlawed by the Thirteenth…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This video was an interview based on Lerone Bennett Jr.’s book Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln’s White Dream. This interview was conducted because the book caused controversy. It supposedly detested everything that anyone was ever taught about Abraham Lincoln and his presidency. Bennett says that his book’s main points were that the Emancipation Proclamation did not free blacks, Lincoln was racist, he wanted to deport blacks, and that Lincoln was the total opposite to what all historians portray him to be. In this paper, I will tell what I learned, and my point of view.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To be legally classified as a Melungeon, meant to be “Nobody at all”. What would it have meant for Abraham Lincoln, a “self-educated”, depressed human being, born in a one room cabin to illegitmate parents to be labeled a “Melungeon”? Would the American people have voted for him? Did Lincoln’s passionate spirit to “free the slaves” come deep from within or did it come from darker place then anybody could ever have imagined? Just how different would the pages of our history books read, if people would have truly believed that Abraham Lincoln was a “Nobody”, a…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln Summary

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The book Abraham Lincoln, written by James M. McPherson, constitutes not only Abraham Lincoln’s life, but also his remarkable presidency. Abraham Lincoln was the sixteenth president of the United States. He also was considered a peacemaker because his passion was to follow God’s law and create every man to be equal. During Lincoln’s first term of presidency in 1860-1864, he followed his passion by abolishing slavery, otherwise known as the Thirteenth Amendment. Following his first term, his second term’s goal is now known as the Fifteenth Amendment. To say the least, McPherson argues the brilliancy of Abraham Lincoln’s ideas and the colossal contribution Lincoln had regarding the United States of America.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Never boring: simple words that describe the simple life of one of the greatest American Heroes of all time. Over the years we have come to understand the Great Emancipator’s struggles and his determination to push for a better future for his nation. In the blink of war, Lincoln came to the nation’s rescue. But was Lincoln really the Great Emancipator? Was Lincoln actually opposed to the slavery movement? Or did he not consider the blacks to be an equal race? Did he make an active effort to free the slaves? Or was the emancipation a never Lincoln’s priority? In my opinion, although freeing the slaves was never Lincoln’s top priority during his tenure as president, Lincoln was sympathetic towards them. His main issue was the war and the probability of the union getting split into two. I believe that Lincoln may not have always seen the black race as equals and that the emancipation came about as a by-product of the Union getting saved.…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the background essay, the Southerners started to elect governments that only wanted white people to rule. In many of the states, they had made sure that a black person didn’t get a place in office, despite the fact that the US Army was protecting the rights of the blacks. Then the election happened. It was Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, against Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate. The entirety of America was on edge, and people thought that the North and the South were going to go to war again. To avoid a war, which also would’ve effectively ended Reconstruction, Rutherford B. Hayes became president. But there was a catch. In order for Hayes to become president, he had to remove the federal soldiers in the South. Nobody could enforce the Southerners to respect the blacks, so it undid the entire effort that went to reconstruction. If it weren’t for the Southerners resistance, Reconstruction would’ve happened and America would be a much different…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first decade after the Civil War, also known as “the era of Reconstruction”, was a time of massive change in the USA. It was the time of the “Old West”, as we are used to seeing it in the movies – cowboys, buffalo hunters, and the construction of railroads; the symbol of prosperity in America. The North and the West grew richer and attracted millions of immigrants from Europe, who were looking for higher wages. Despite the fact that highly skilled workers were paid more than they would receive in their homeland, these were times of inequality, and poverty. These events blended together with those following the Civil War in the South, as the Era of Reconstruction unfolded.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, "If Lincoln Had Not Freed The Slaves" Tom Wicker, the author, answers the question what if Lincoln had not freed the slaves. He seeks to give a detailed and historically accurate response to this intriguing question: What if Abraham Lincoln, the Great Emancipator, had not freed the slaves? After doing a considerable amount of research on Lincoln and his presidency, the author displays multiple scenarios for what would have happened if slavery had not been abolished. He then shows everything that was done during this time period was in fact a domino effect. For example, in the article it states the following sentence: "Had eleven undefeated Southern states returned to the Union, to Congress, and to American politics, neither the thirteenth Amendment, abolishing slavery, the fourteenth, guaranteeing equal protection of the laws, nor the fifteenth, establishing the right to vote to persons of color and to former slaves, would have been…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays