In the story Winston talks about how he works in the Mistry of truth and destroys past knowledge and creates lies. In the story, it says ““Books, also, were recalled and rewritten again and again, and were invariably reissued without any admission that any alteration had been made. Even the written instructions which Winston received, and which he invariably got rid of as soon as he had dealt with them, never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed;”. The fact that the ministry burns its “false” history is bad in of its self. The government shouldn’t burn its history it should embrace what it did wrong. When a government burns its history to change its truth then people wouldn’t trust one another because one person may know something that may be the actual truth and another person may know the fake “truth’. They wouldn’t know the actual truth and know is right of not. It would cause them to not trust one another. Altering the truth would cause people to not trust one
In the story Winston talks about how he works in the Mistry of truth and destroys past knowledge and creates lies. In the story, it says ““Books, also, were recalled and rewritten again and again, and were invariably reissued without any admission that any alteration had been made. Even the written instructions which Winston received, and which he invariably got rid of as soon as he had dealt with them, never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed;”. The fact that the ministry burns its “false” history is bad in of its self. The government shouldn’t burn its history it should embrace what it did wrong. When a government burns its history to change its truth then people wouldn’t trust one another because one person may know something that may be the actual truth and another person may know the fake “truth’. They wouldn’t know the actual truth and know is right of not. It would cause them to not trust one another. Altering the truth would cause people to not trust one