Preview

What Is The Main Compromise Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Main Compromise Of The Constitution
One compromise of the constitution was The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. The Great Compromise was put into place because the states could not agree upon how they should each be represented in national government. The smaller states did not want representation based on population because they would then have less representatives in government. The larger states believed that because their population was greater they should have more representation for their people. The smaller states favored the New Jersey Plan. The New Jersey Plan stated that each state would get the same number of representatives. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan. The Virginia plan stated that each state would have a different number of votes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before we knew it as the United States Constitution, we all knew it as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was just too weak as in: each state had one vote in Congress, there was no executive branch to enforce laws passed by Congress, there was no national court system, and etc… Before it could be ratified there was great concern between the delegates that were present at the convention. The main concern they had was the type of legislature. The representatives of larger states wanted the seats in the legislature to be determined by the size of the state. The representatives from the smaller states wanted to have equal representation in Congress. They negotiated on this situation by allowing a bicameral legislature,…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then the great compromise was reached on June 29, 1787. This was a combination of the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan Connecticut Compromise, which stated that there would be two houses (bicameral). One house would have equal representation and the other would be based on population. It was called the Connecticut Compromise because Roger Sherman, who had offered a compromise dealing with the issues of slavery and representation, was from Connecticut. Members of the House of Representatives (lower house) would be appointed among the states according to population and would be elected by the people. Members of the Senate (upper house) would be chosen by the lower house and would have an equal number of representatives for each state. The House has the power to originate all bills for raising or spending money (they write the bills to be passed) and the Senate favors the smaller states with two senators for each state. This compromise also included the Three-Fifths Compromise which tackled the issue of slaves being…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1787, the Constitutional Convention started in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, PA. The purpose of the convention was to make changes to the Articles of Confederation. The Great Compromise - It was decide that the House of Representatives was to be based on population and Senate would have two members. The three-fifths compromise - each slave was counted as 3/5 of a person in the state’s population. The Commerce and Trade Compromise promised that Congress would not tax exports and could regulate trade. It also was decided that there was a need for separation of power and a system was set up for checks and balances.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Population)…” But, on the other hand small states would have a disadvantage of representation in the House like, Rhode Island. Big state v. small state guarded against tyranny because we came up with a compromise of two senators for each state. Through the compromise no one state gains more control and has more power than the…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the three-fifths compromise was enacted. It was one of the most controversial topics at the time. The three-fifths compromise was a way for southerners to ensure that they weren’t out-numbered in the House of Representative. James Williams, a northern coincidentally proposed the three-fifths act. It didn’t benefit the north because they…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three-fifths compromise was system in between the states to determine a person who is enslaved as a three-fifths of a person. The south was overpopulated and continued to grow due to slavery James Wilson proposed this in 1787 and this showed how proslavery was forced during those times. Because the Virginia Plan was denied, the three-fifths compromise was suggested and made the cut for the south to be powerfully represented in the House of Representatives and have too much power when electing presidents. Compared to the northerner states they seemed to disregard slavery. The difference between he northerner states and southern was that the northerner states counted one free man as one vote and one slave not a vote to southern states counting the slaves as a vote as well as one free man as a vote.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is the Virginia Plan, also called the Large State Plan, which advised that the representation in a bicameral legislature be proportional to property or population. The other is the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states regardless to population in a unicameral legislature. Had the Virginia Plan been adopted entirely, large states would always have a dominant voice over the smaller states. On the other hand, if the New Jersey plan had been adopted entirely, bigger states with bigger needs would never prevail. When the delegates began to discuss this issue, they willingly agreed that a bicameral legislature is necessary for the new national government. They differed widely, however, in the representation of the two houses. Bitter debates followed until, finally, the compromise of equal representation in the House and proportional representation in the Senate was reached. In Henry Steele Commager 's article, "The Constitution, Was It an Economic Document?", he remarked that the framers "feared the powers of the majority, as they feared all power unless controlled" (141); the compromise of the representation of the houses underscores exactly this point because it prevents an absolute body majority which would prove to be fatal to the country had they had a malevolent intent. Furthermore, the compromise effectively appealed to all states and therefore…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, to start with, helped settle the dispute between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan by coming up with the Connecticut Compromise. He said that not only should the larger states be in control, but the people who could retain money were responsible enough to run the government. Alexander Hamilton was a smart business man and would later become the secretary of the Treasury. In the mean time, his idea for putting money savvy people in charge would lead to the establishment of the Electoral College. Responsible people were elected to the Electoral College, and they would make the best decision for who should be president based off which person was voted for more in their state. Each state was to have an equal number of representatives. He also contributed to the making of the House of Representatives. The House is where the larger states would get more people and have more of a say or vote in different matters.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Crittenden Compromise was important to the history of America because it let the south have slaves, and the north to ban them forever. The Crittenden Compromise was written by Senator John J. Crittenden in December, 1860. It had six amendments and it stated that north of 36°30' latitude would not be allowed slaves, but the south would. It was denied from passing Congress by Republicans and Abraham Lincoln. The Republicans denied it because they wanted more areas to have slaves, however Lincoln opposed it because he believed that there should be less area.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Fifths Compromise made it fair for all involved or so the states would want us to believe such nonsense. The population numbers detremine the taxes as well the representation of each state. Who would be counted as population in the census became a big debate among the states.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays