Preview

Essay On The Crittenden Compromise

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The Crittenden Compromise
What if the American Civil War never happened? It could have if the Crittenden Compromise would have passed. The Crittenden Compromise was one of the last attempts to stop a war from happening in America. The Crittenden Compromise is one cause of the Civil War. It would have allowed the southern states to have slaves, and the northern to not. It also would have allowed the Confederates to maintain their beliefs in slavery being useful and right.

First, the Crittenden Compromise was important to the history of America because it let the south have slaves, and the north to ban them forever. The Crittenden Compromise was written by Senator John J. Crittenden in December, 1860. It had six amendments and it stated that north of 36°30' latitude would not be allowed slaves, but the south would. It was denied from passing Congress by Republicans and Abraham Lincoln. The Republicans denied it because they wanted more areas to have slaves, however Lincoln opposed it because he believed that there should be less area.

Next, the Crittenden Compromise was an important part of American history because it may have prevented fighting over slavery in the future. Amendment two in the Crittenden Compromise says that Congress can not ban
…show more content…
These amendments were written to let all states south of 36°30' latitude to have slaves. However, to have slaves north of the line was illegal. Slavery would be legal in the District of Columbia as long as it was apart of Virginia and Maryland, and/or with the consent from the citizens to ban it. The confederates were fighting for slavery to be in more places, and because most of them lived in the North they disagreed with it. Even though John Crittenden wrote it in hopes of preventing a war, it still wasn't a good enough compromise for both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was also important because it was successful, unlike future compromises. The Missouri compromise was successful for a number of reasons, not just because Congress was perfectly willing…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though compromises and agreements look straight forward, the parties involved usually have ulterior motives. The Compromise of 1877 was consisted of a few main point. It called for the withdrawal of all federal troops from the South, supported internal improvements in the South and promised to appoint at least one Southerner to the cabinet. Also it gave conservative Southern Democrats some control over their local patronage and gave the South a free hand in race relations. Many may have seen these details as a way to mend the country back together, however it was really just a despicable plan. Although the Compromise of 1877 was successful in burying sectional tensions, in reality, it was a cynical political deal because it was a fraudulent election, white conservatives maintained power, and blacks became disenfranchised.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three-fifths Compromise: The problem was that the southern states thought the slaves should be counted in population, not for taxation, but the northern states opposed. The south had less free people than the north, so they wanted an equal say in the government. After much deliberation, a compromise was made. The south needed a compromise in order to ratify the constitution for themselves. They decided to make all free people count as a whole, and all non-free people count as 3/5 of a person, but also, the non-free people counted as 3/5 for taxation purposes as well.…

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were considered property, which caused a big dispute. If property was counted with the representation other items should’ve been considered as well. If slaves were property they should have be counted with taxation purpose, which would increase the wealth of the south. James Madison had an idea to the amendment to the Articles of Confederation in 1783. Under this compromise, each slave would count as three-fifths of a person both for representation and taxation purposes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three-fifths compromise was system in between the states to determine a person who is enslaved as a three-fifths of a person. The south was overpopulated and continued to grow due to slavery James Wilson proposed this in 1787 and this showed how proslavery was forced during those times. Because the Virginia Plan was denied, the three-fifths compromise was suggested and made the cut for the south to be powerfully represented in the House of Representatives and have too much power when electing presidents. Compared to the northerner states they seemed to disregard slavery. The difference between he northerner states and southern was that the northerner states counted one free man as one vote and one slave not a vote to southern states counting the slaves as a vote as well as one free man as a vote.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromises from 1846 to 1861 were, by their intentions, to postpone the struggle between the north and the south temporarily but not to solve it. The foundational problems, like the the slavery itself, the differences in social structure and economic system and the expansion of slavery, were left. The increasing struggle between the abolitionists and slave owners and between the newly formed Republican Party and the Democratic Party kept putting those questions in front of the US people. The compromises themselves failed to satisfy the wants of both sides, enraged the north and frightened the south, so up to the election of Lincoln, the tension built up to a climax and finally broke out to become a civil war.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court in this case, essentially threw out the Missouri Compromise, which was essentially only legislation keeping the battle between free states and slave states at bay. The Missouri Compromise was the only remaining bandage left covering the wound between the northern and southern states, due to the division of slave ownership. The reason behind labeling the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional is due to the fact that congress has no power to pass any legislature concerning personal property, and by doing so would infringe upon individuals personal rights. However, if all of the above was not enough to frighten the state rights fighters, then the fact that this Supreme Court decision essentially stripped states the right to decide whether or not they wanted to allow or ban slavery would most likely be the cherry on top. Due to the fact that the Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional, the federal government could no longer ban slavery in certain states, therefore allowing for any state to support or ban slavery at will. The problem with this initiative was the fact that there would not be an imbalance in the house and senate due to the unequal influx of free and slave states, which means less state representation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The only reason the 13th amendment came to be was because the Civil War broke slaveries stronghold over politics and constitutional development. In 1787 the constitution always was protecting slavery. The document did not say the word slavery, but everyone knew what it meant. The Civil War helped slavery…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 is one of the most important compromises in this history of the United States, maybe even the world. The Compromise of 1850 is made up of five bills passed in the United States of America in September 1850, and it terminated a four-year confrontation between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north concerning the position of territories gained during the time of the Mexican-American war which was in 1846-1848. The most important political ramification in the Compromise has to be the Fugitive Slave Act for numerous reasons. Many historians have argued that the Fugitive Slave Act was very obliging to the abolitionist cause, even though…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern states were concerned that they would lose ability to make decisions regarding slavery. The Constitution included the ⅗ compromise, which allowed the southern states to have more representation in the Electoral College and the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One compromise of the constitution was The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. The Great Compromise was put into place because the states could not agree upon how they should each be represented in national government. The smaller states did not want representation based on population because they would then have less representatives in government. The larger states believed that because their population was greater they should have more representation for their people. The smaller states favored the New Jersey Plan. The New Jersey Plan stated that each state would get the same number of representatives. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan. The Virginia plan stated that each state would have a different number of votes…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A) The three-fifths compromise made by James Wilson was to help the southern states maintain slavery. This was only as long as the southern states fought for the Northwest Ordinance, and proportional representation. The three-fifths compromise is one of the most well-known compromises. This compromise had the notion that slaves would count as three fifths of a person. This compromise would settle the debated issue over whether slaves were to be considered a human or property. In addition, it allowed the southern states to have a more proportional representation of their population. In The Summer of 1787, it states “Wilson’s new resolution required the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives on the basis of an equitable ratio of representation in proportion to the whole number of white & other free citizens & inhabitants . . . and three-fifths of all other persons not comprehended in the foregoing description, except Indians not paying taxes. . .” (Stewart 78). The compromise created an alliance with the large states and the south. This alliance not only assisted Wilson with his votes, but protected slavery for the south. Lastly, the Northwest Ordinance prohibited slavery in the new western territories. The new western territories were starting to become more popular, and a choice would have to be made on the issue of slavery laws would be. When Congressman Nathan Dane proposed the prohibition of slavery in these territories, many slave states agreed to the…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great compromise was one of the key arguments at the Constitutional convention. The Larger states had a bigger population when they added slaves, they would have more votes than the smaller states. The larger states like the Virginia plan because it was favoring the larger states. The New Jersey plan also William Paterson favored it. They wanted all states to have an equal vote one vote.The New Jersey plan was favored for the smaller states. The people would vote for the representative government or legislators. The larger states wanted more power in the legislature. They wanted to count slaves, but since they are slaves, they didn't count, so the counted ⅗ compromise so ⅗ slaves were counted as 3…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reaction Paper Exam 1

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages

    some kind of protection for citizens here in the United States. James Madison became one of the…

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays